- Jul 22, 2009
- 13
- 0
- 0
thehog said:The additional dynamic in regards to Hamilton's ex-wife is particularly sick.
Missed that. What happened between Armstrong and Hamilton's wife?
thehog said:The additional dynamic in regards to Hamilton's ex-wife is particularly sick.
dadane said:Great to see the UK tabloids are doing proper hard-hitting journalism and enlightening the public to the profound consequences of this controversy.![]()
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other-sports/cycling/lance-armstrong-banned-tour-de-1278142
thehog said:The psychological dynamic is interesting.
In both the Landis and Hamilton cases Armstrong was "active" behind the scenes ensuring they were snared.
When caught he was telling them to "fight" so not only did they lose their title but their careers, money, families, everything.
The additional dynamic in regards to Hamilton's ex-wife is particularly sick.
What was also confirmed for me is that the UCI's use of anti-doping is not for anti-doping but "control". By allowing doping but controlling the riders through anti-doping will never set them free. By having Hamilton test positive the UCI clearly doesn't about the sports image. They just like to control who tests positive.
Briant_Gumble said:If any of you have facebook, I think Travis Tygart could do with some love:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Travis-Tygart/160670527402969
There's a lot of hate pages from Lance Armstrong shills.
marcozero said:Missed that. What happened between Armstrong and Hamilton's wife?
Briant_Gumble said:If any of you have facebook, I think Travis Tygart could do with some love:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Travis-Tygart/160670527402969
There's a lot of hate pages from Lance Armstrong shills.
thehog said:In the French press this morning they're running a story in regards to Armstrong's sports gambling. According to the report he used to bet 400k on himself for the win netting him 5million. Now it becomes interesting if A) because of the doping but also B) forcing other competitors to get caught meaning he knew he was going to win and collect the bet.
That's fraud. A lot of sports don't allow the players to bet on themselves maybe cycling still does.
Benotti69 said:It may also be illegal in certain countries.
Does it detail where he made these bets.
Wonder did Hein, Pat et all do similar?
Benotti69 said:It may also be illegal in certain countries.
Does it detail where he made these bets.
Wonder did Hein, Pat et all do similar?
Briant_Gumble said:That was the first thing I thought of, there trying to squash some **** and it's more severe than them taking the reported $125,000 bribe and letting Armstrong get away with it to bring more notoriety to cycling as am marketable representative with a good story.
This seems like the sort of thing they would do beyond just taking a massive, direct cash bribe.
I would guess they would have to create a pseudonym or something.
thehog said:In the French press this morning they're running a story in regards to Armstrong's sports gambling. According to the report he used to bet 400k on himself for the win netting him 5million. Now it becomes interesting if A) because of the doping but also B) forcing other competitors to get caught meaning he knew he was going to win and collect the bet.
That's fraud. A lot of sports don't allow the players to bet on themselves maybe cycling still does.
thehog said:http://www.rtl.fr/actualites/sport/...gent-sur-lui-meme-pour-gagner-plus-7752091839
There were probably several people in on it.
Race Radio said:This is just about SCA, not gambling
the big ring said:Insurance is essentially gambling.
What's detailed above is the SCA insurance case. At a guess. $400k would be the final year premium, with $5M the payout that ended up going to trial and finally settlement.
sittingbison said:Ring, the payout was $7.5m (Lance got costs), so SCA would be going after that plus seven years of compound interest lol
sittingbison said:Ring, the payout was $7.5m (Lance got costs), so SCA would be going after that plus seven years of compound interest lol
Race Radio said:Plus the $4 Million from previous payouts. Plus penalty and interest
nyvelocity @nyvelocity
The positives USADA have are new, previously undisclosed. Which begs the question, who covered it up?
nyvelocity @nyvelocity
Sheryl Crow AND Kristin Armstrong cooperated
JRTinMA said:Interesting stuff from twitter. Yes RR you told us about Sheryl Crow first![]()
thehog said:Wonder if Ullrich is happy with his 2nd places now?
It's a possibility, but we have yet to see any evidence pointing in that direction.BroDeal said:Don't assume Ullrich was not getting the same treatment as Armstrong. Having Ulle as Armstrong's foil was good for business.
thehog said:The 2004 positive will be interesting.
This could detonate a nuclear weapon under the entire anti-doping process if the labs are also complicit the cover ups along with the UCI.
Wonder if Ullrich is happy with his 2nd places now?