POS Landis? Wow, dude, you just took yourself WAY down in my books.
Sounds like a reasonable solution to me, except it is hard to believe anybody in the top 20 was RELATIVELY clean up through 2002 or 3. Maybe even later. See :
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/david-walsh-on-armstrong-and-usadas-charges
I sure hope it does come out. I have to agree with so many of the comments here:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/french-cycling-reacts-armstrong-to-lose-tour-titles. It is so late in coming.
I also do not care if LA loses his wins. They make NO difference, because the whole top end was involved in the same business. What would have made a difference is when all the evidence comes out. All of the "hows" and "how-to's" need to come out and be made public, so that we can have a reasonable chance of preventing them in the future. They need to be public so that even the "doubting Thomases" work with anti-doping procedures. Some never will, of course, but we need most to work to keep things clean.
Without Lance being painted publicly as guilty, the knowledge that doping was practically universal in the pro peloton for so many years will never be strong. That knowledge has to be strong. To be "strong", it must be widely known and accepted as true. Without the main figurehead of doping being known, the rest is just throwing the occassional tidbit to the mobs to keep them quiet, while in reality they starve.
The USADA must release their evidence. Maybe they are waiting a few days so people like George can finish out their careers. Fine, I can understand that - but the evidence must come out.