Interesting how commentary can so run contrary form forum to forum. Like here after this article. There is more of a trend against the accusers and the process. Like DZ's "they forced me to do it" statement.
The troll bot link:
http://bicycling.com/blogs/boulderr...-report-to-detail-evidence-in-armstrong-case/
I still think many of Armstrong's accusers are not telling the whole truth about themselves. The genesis of doping for them was not Armstrong, Bruyneel, Riis or Europe, in my opinion, but very likely made at an earlier point. It may have not involved EPO, but I am doubtful that all was well in Neverland and with the Lost Boys long before USPS.
What's startling about the USADA evidence is it does little to look beyond Armstrong and onto U.S. soil. Ferrari is one but one in how many that play the game across the spectrum of sport? Armstrong's accusers fall into the mindset of victimology, but Armstrong still has and will forever have the gun of federal charges pointed his head. He will probably remain silent forever and never have a chance to be anything than the central villain while the others can publish books, go on with their careers and paint themselves as recanting saviors of the sport. Those who say Armstrong had a chance to come clean under in the same light are not calling it like it is. None of the 11 had a federal Grand Jury convened against them. The got the deal on much friendlier terms. Accusations of defrauding the government was and is serious business.
Talk of this changing things even in light of a new governing body, could happen but, over the long run, human nature runs strong and true.
The sport could simply die in the face of other sports that will achieve spectacular results and attract an audience because they go mostly unchecked.
As someone pointed out earlier, any doping program is a conspiracy. Armstrong simply flew too close to the sun with wings made of wax.