Re: Re:
goggalor said:
Benotti69 said:
Crankpunk spells it out about BMC
http://www.crankpunk.com/blogs/crankpun ... d-out.html
Who thinks of BMC as the "good guys"? I've never heard of that. Everyone knows they're dodgy, it's just that they rarely get any big wins and their riders often animate races so no one cares. If they ever manage to perform according to their budget the Clinic will be all over them.
Well, you do have guys on BMC that are outspoken about doping, TJ? Surely he doesn't want to be involved with a team that has anybody doping. But then again, how do you know what every single person has done/will do on their own?
I think BMC has done a fine job internally trying to control/deal with doping. Sure, there have been some suspicious things in the past, like Gilbert's amazing run of the classics a few years ago, Hushovd etc...but they never came up dirty anybody.
Technically, he broke the rules with the association of the Dr. The cortisone thing, that is a joke, it is legal to use cortisone...ask Froome/UCI etc...just not during competition.
And as much as his face has been on the podium, on the front, making things interesting, you know he is getting tested pretty often. No positives. So...kind of a silly ban request...6 months....OK, give him the Danielson/Garmin treatment over the off season in September.