Re:
Full genius is being kind.jens_attacks said:anti-doping going full genius...
Full genius is being kind.jens_attacks said:anti-doping going full genius...
this is what i was saying in a previous thread, every post twisted to link to personal agenda. nothing added to the discussion.sniper said:tough for Van Avermaet.
pays big bucks to gear up on AICAR, EPO and god knows what else.
manages to mask it succesfully.
gets busted for Diprophos.
sees guys like Froome skate with fasttracked TUEs for similar products.
Cycling and anti-doping deserve each other.richwagmn said:Full genius is being kind.jens_attacks said:anti-doping going full genius...
Just to end the misinformation. In this case, his federation is the only one with the authority to open the sanction. The National Anti-doping Organization merely acts at the direction of the federation. Armstrong's situation was different and extraordinary.SkyTears said:poor Greg, but i think he will dodge this, poor evidence , easy to defend. belgium federation probably has a dude that wants to be a hero like Travis.
260 000 Euro fine and a 2 year ban for injecting baby food. This sport is so ridiculous.Lyon said:Cycling and anti-doping deserve each other.richwagmn said:Full genius is being kind.jens_attacks said:anti-doping going full genius...
Where's the proof?Franklin said:@Hrotha, it's amazing isn't it? The guy breaks the rules and there's something shady with a TUE... and people are saying this is alll unfair? Even more astounding... someone who rightly investigates and prosecutes is being labeled as a wanna-be Travis?
Greg knew the rules. The appologists here also know the rules.
He said he used cortisone once in 2012 (prescribed) to treat that heel of his because he was suffering a lot from it and could even barely walk. Now compare with all the guys using the same stuff throughout the year, for far shadier reasons.Franklin said:@Hrotha, it's amazing isn't it? The guy breaks the rules and there's something shady with a TUE... and people are saying this is alll unfair? Even more astounding... someone who rightly investigates and prosecutes is being labeled as a wanna-be Travis?
Greg knew the rules. The appologists here also know the rules.
Well that's what the investigation is for, isn't it? If there really is no proof, he'll walk, and that's fine.Flamin said:Where's the proof?![]()
That's the point.. there is no proofhrotha said:Well that's what the investigation is for, isn't it? If there really is no proof, he'll walk, and that's fine.Flamin said:Where's the proof?![]()
But some people here are acting as if he should walk even if he broke the rules.
No, the point you are blatantly missing is that the mentioned acts indeed are against the rules.Flamin said:That's the point.. there is no proofit's an incredibly weak case. A well known Belgian sports journalist says that he knows the prosecutor a little bit and that he thinks the prosecutor expects to get nothing but sees this as a kind of 'warning' for all athletes in general.
Lol, and you do have inside knowledge that he DID break the rules?Franklin said:No, the point you are blatantly missing is that the mentioned acts indeed are against the rules.Flamin said:That's the point.. there is no proofit's an incredibly weak case. A well known Belgian sports journalist says that he knows the prosecutor a little bit and that he thinks the prosecutor expects to get nothing but sees this as a kind of 'warning' for all athletes in general.
Now you might be right and the case will not stand, but you and the others are not so much ridiculing the evidence(which is impossible considering you have zero inside knowledge), but the proposed sanctions.
This place exists due to the riders (and all the enablers) in the sport and their all too willingness to embrace the culture of doping, yet you choose to call this place 'pathetic'? Wowsers!Flamin said:Lol, and you do have inside knowledge that he DID break the rules?![]()
I made 2 posts here in which I said nothing about sanctions, but whatever.
Anyway, don't bother, I'm out again of this pathetic place![]()
To be clear, this is arbitration using the federation's rules, which should be WADA compliant, but *do* vary.Flamin said:That's the point.. there is no proofhrotha said:Well that's what the investigation is for, isn't it? If there really is no proof, he'll walk, and that's fine.Flamin said:Where's the proof?![]()
But some people here are acting as if he should walk even if he broke the rules.it's an incredibly weak case. A well known Belgian sports journalist says that he knows the prosecutor a little bit and that he thinks the prosecutor expects to get nothing but sees this as a kind of 'warning' for all athletes in general.
I certainly did not claim that. I claimed that the accusation is about naughty things.Flamin said:Lol, and you do have inside knowledge that he DID break the rules?![]()
You rant about the accusations and accompanying sanctions. Indeed, the prosecutor is the bad guy, which is odd considering he's just following the rules.I made 2 posts here in which I said nothing about sanctions, but whatever.
Simply because someone is not ranting about the prosecutor?Anyway, don't bother, I'm out again of this pathetic place![]()