Firstly, thank-you to Big Mac (yes, as another pointed out; a rather ironic name!) for beginning this thread, and for sharing his wealth of knowledge with us on this subject; which is a fascinating one as it can branch off onto some many different points of discussion.
I found myself entering into this thread a couple of nights ago. I was sufficiently bored enough to do so (previously I've mostly just used the cycling forum for professional road cycling discussion), though also sufficiently alive enough. To both open the thread and to continue reading through to the end. It must have taken me a few hours to get through and it was well past midnight by the time that I finished, so the thread caught my attention pretty well.
That doesn't mean that I will become a vegan, or a vegetarian. It is not the start of something. But it is a start.
Just prior to stumbling upon this discussion I was doing some other reading, and a word that stuck in my craw from that was "selfish" (even though I wasn't thinking about vegetarianism/veganism at the time).
There was also the phrase, "straight from the horses mouth", though that's quite a different story....
SELFISH. That's the main talking point here, right?
Big Mac has made the regular points about eating meat being done for taste (pleasure) and for convenience, that we don't have to eat meat at all to survive. Very true, although on that point, I am not sure if completely eliminating animal products from ones diet is going to be overall more beneficial from a personal health perspective than to still be eating some meat? We are omnivores.
Iron deficiency?
I don't know much on these subjects though, so feel free to tell me otherwise.
Anyway, selfish. Let's talk about that, as individuals. Another poster mentioned that there are numerous ways that one can help the environment, other humans, other animals, etc. Some people do it in different ways. He was adamant that he was going to keep eating meat. Fair enough.
If Big Mac were to eat another Big Mac, he'd see the cow that he's eating. You know what I mean? He'd really see that cow being killed. He couldn't do it. A lot of this stuff is based on "turning a blind eye". As Big Mac has pointed out better than anyone.
But how much happiness and meaningfulness (and convenience) do we deserve to give ourselves?
Let's look at a subject already touched on here. The issue of humanity and sustenance. How do we feed ourselves now? And how will we be able to feed ourselves in the future? We know that there are MANY fellow humans starving to death in our current world.
I recently took the liberty of going on an overseas holiday. Did I have to do that? No, of course not. Did I want to do that? Absolutely! I cannot emphasise that enough. And I received immeasurable quantities of happiness and meaningfulness from my European adventure.
That $6,000 or $8,000 or whatever it was; that could have gone to others more needy. Hey, it could have gone directly to animals. But we can use humans in this example. How many African children could I have saved by giving that money to World Vision? Many. The point that I am attempting to make is that we could all probably do more for other creatures if we REALLY wanted to. Should we therefore not spend on luxuries for ourselves as a result? I can categorically say that my life wouldn't be anywhere near at all as meaningful today without my overseas trips. And those trips cost money, whilst thousands of people are starving....
I know that the point has been made that by not eating meat we increase our own sustainability. But one person becoming vegetarian/vegan is a much smaller (and less direct) impact than my example given above.
What if our minds and eyes have to permanently watch humans starving?? There's one dead. There's another. Doesn't a human starve to death every six seconds or so?
What about the need for humans to attach themselves to a label, to give themselves a name? How much does being a vegan feed Big Mac's ego? Probably a lot. How much does pointing that out feed mine? Probably a lot. I've just had a discussion with a mate (like me he eats a lot of meat, although he is someone who one can approach about a subject like this; he's open minded; most guys would just laugh you off) about Mount Everest, and the pursuits of humans to climb it. And more specifically to climb all the way to the TOP of it. Apparently about 80% of deaths from climbers occur during the final 10% or so of the ascent. Surely to climb to that 80% point is already an EXPERIENCE enough? It's certainly an epic ACHIEVEMENT in itself. But it probably wouldn't feed the individual ego enough, and when speaking to others in the aftermath, they wouldn't be able to say that; "I climbed Mt Everest."
And that probably works a little better in bars
So with Big Mac, I would ask what already has been (or at least something similar).
If you knew a farmer and knew that that farmer treated his cows well and even supported them in life past their work usage date, could you then eat chocolate that included that cows milk?
I ask because a) I don't see how I could even become a vegan as I love chocolate!
And b) because I raise the point about labels; for if you drank that milk then you wouldn't be able to say; "I am a Vegan."
BTW, I haven't watched Earthlings; at least not yet.
And I am THE person that you described. The one who has pets - and treats them like a Queen and a King - and considers himself somewhat of an animal lover, but eats heaps of meat. In effect, killing heaps of animals in the process.
I feed my dogs processed meat too. So even if I change my eating habits I don't know if I'd stop with theirs. Although I have heard that cats must have meat in their diets, whereas dogs don't. Still, my dogs love their meatballs.
There's a heap more to say on this expansive topic, but - at least with some follow up correspondence - that is a start.