- Jul 22, 2009
- 107
- 0
- 0
This case seems to have a lot of circumstantial evidence, but no smoking gun (that is solid).fatandfast said:Now Landis says he took one year to figure out the relationship between Lance and the UCI. He was faster on what the business plan of CTS was based on. Some data he saw on the WWW compared to what he and Lance actually rode that day. He also knows how often Lance spoke to the folks at CTS and he concluded it was a scam.
His story is more refined than ever.
Ie, several ex-employees, friends, etc, who overheard or saw suspicious activity.
With no positive tests and no 'being caught redhanded', won't this be sort of hard to prove?
Just asking ......