whittashau said:
Does he have an engine in his bike?
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
whittashau said:
whittashau said:
I say more than 30 seconds even with technical route.maxmartin said:Tony is still a great benchmark, in 2013 first ITT Froom was only around 10 seconds behind Tony. It is very interesting to see where Nibali stacks with the Tony in the final ITT. For sure this route is more technical then 2013 first ITT.
ILovecycling said:I say more than 30 seconds even with technical route.
I dont believe Nibali can be better than +30secs on Martin,thats science fictionmaxmartin said:Let's wait and see. AS said yellow jersey gives you wings but that did not work for him. LOL
ILovecycling said:I dont believe Nibali can be better than +30secs on Martin,thats science fiction
ILovecycling said:I dont believe Nibali can be better than +30secs on Martin,thats science fiction
I say he will lose more than 30s on Martin.maxmartin said:I actually don't understand what u are saying. Are u saying Nibali is ahead of Tony by 30 seconds or Nibali is within 30 seconds to Tony? My prediction is Nibali will get very close to Tony or even beat him but not by 30 seconds though.
Like usually your post is burbling with nonsense...cineteq said:You two are way off. Nibali is going to lose the ITT to Martin. Predicting 1:30 to 2:00 minutes.
2 reasons:
1. Martin is in exceptional shape, and his climbing is much better this year.
2. Nibali doesn't have to try and win this stage if his leading by 10 minutes.
Van Garderen is probably the one who needs to win it to podium.
maxmartin said:Due to Nibali's huge success in this Tour, SKY (aka golden standard of procycling) decides to hire the son of Mr. Martinelli (aka Nibali's tour winning director).
For obvious reasons (zero something), SKY could not hire Mr. Martinelli directly. I guess it totally makes sense, since the proteams always try to better the trainings in any possible way, just like AC hired former SKY trainer to better himself. Glad to see the proteams are exchanging training information freely, it will only makes races more exciting.
LaFlorecita said:Sigh.... I hope your post isn't serious, but I'm sure it is. Martinelli was a trainee with Sky already a few years ago. And this year, it was already reported before the Tour. FGS. and that notion of teams freely exchanging training information is too ridiculous to even spend time writing about.
I just hope Contador sticks to his new Sky training regime and not to the stupid Nibali/Schleck -be **** all year and then super peak for the tour - training.
Rollthedice said:Mee too, I hope for the sake of competition that Contador sticks with De Jongh style and not the stupid be **** all year like in 2013, no peak whatsoever for tour - training.
Is the ITT pan flat? No. Has Nibali win an ITT against Martin, Wiggings? No. Has Van Garderen been a better TTer than Nibali? YesILovecycling said:I say he will lose more than 30s on Martin.
Like usually your post is burbling with nonsense...
1.Because of better climbing,Tony will win TT,ohhh (or whats your point)
2.He doesnt have to win any other stage from now,soo...
great logic
Yeah,thats an obvious hilly itt that 1,4k hill will make massive gaps,actually I cant wait to see Tony to start his climbing legscineteq said:Is the ITT pan flat? No. Has Nibali win an ITT against Martin, Wiggings? No. Has Van Garderen been a better TTer than Nibali? Yes
I'm not sure what you call logic bro. Anyway, now you've been quote for posterity.
cineteq said:You two are way off. Nibali is going to lose the ITT to Martin. Predicting 1:30 to 2:00 minutes.
2 reasons:
1. Martin is in exceptional shape, and his climbing is much better this year.
2. Nibali doesn't have to try and win this stage if his leading by 10 minutes.
Van Garderen is probably the one who needs to win it to podium.
Nice to see, in short, the answer was NO.pigoonse said:Is this a devalued TdF win for Nibali? Some experts give their opinion.
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/raci...ued-tour-de-france-win-vincenzo-nibali-130714
cineteq said:Nice to see, in short, the answer was NO.
"If he wins, he will have won against everyone, luck and bad luck both calculated in"
pigoonse said:If he is to win would it be a devalued TdF win for Nibali? Some experts give their opinion.
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/raci...ued-tour-de-france-win-vincenzo-nibali-130714