Re:
El Pistolero said:
You can't just compare average watts of two different Tours and make conclusions based on that. There are far too many variables to take into account like route, weather and perhaps most importantly: the pace being set by mountain trains before the favorites start attacking each other. I can guarantee you that the average w/kg Nibali reached during his attacks in the Tour of 2014 are vastly superior to those of Bardet during this year's Tour.
Ps:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmwLb6Grvfw
This wasn't too long ago.
I knew you'd say that. Perfect argument.
Having said that, we do compare climbing times.
ammattipyoraily and Mihai do say that Froome is the best but cannot do what Lance did. They say that by looking at data. Data never lies.
We can keep arguing. Now you'll claim the calculations done are wrong. The data is faulty. We shouldnt use Ferrari's formula. Its ***.
Seriously you're gonna show me Tour of Oman? Lol. Its so early in the season. They count for nothing IMO. Bardet wasn't doing the Giro; Nibali was. He had to show better form early. Would have been interesting had Landa been there. He looked crazy strong.
Tour of Romandie Froome lost 17 minutes in the first mountain stage. The reason why I saw this is because early form counts for nothing generally.
Froome lit up the field in the Dauphine. Your name says youre a Contador fan. Froome looked at Contador before picking up the cadence the second time. He cracked him. It sure looked like he was asking about that coffee. :lol: :lol:
But Contador is a great champion. Kudos for being a fighter.