The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Even if you don't consider the prehistory of the sport... the most successful Italian rider was the Campionissimo, Fausto Coppi.I have been reading the comments on Nibali's career that he was, after Gimondi, the most successful Italian cyclist. Yet, with no disrespect, Pantani was something else.
Nibali was the reason why Italian cycling stayed relevant for so long when everything pointed to a steady decline of the movement and when most other riders here had clinic issues. We had a champion to cheer for, and a very brave one. Not the kind of raw talent you could see in Pantani but someone who wouldn't give up, who would respect the Monuments as the GTs, who would (mostly) look human.
At the end of the year I'll make a top10 of his best ever races. For now I'll keep treating him as an active rider and hope he can win a stage in the Giro.
Guess I wasn't around for Pantani but I wouldn't put him close on that list.
I guess if I make my take any hotter I don't ever get to enter Italy again
The question is whether you rate overall palmares or peak performance higher.Agree. Not a good enough all around rider and didn't dominate GT's enough (at least in terms of total victories) to rate alongside Nibali.
Guess I wasn't around for Pantani but I wouldn't put him close on that list.
I guess if I make my take any hotter I don't ever get to enter Italy again
Even if you don't consider the prehistory of the sport... the most successful Italian rider was the Campionissimo, Fausto Coppi.
Then there is Bartali.
And then perhaps we can discuss Gimondi, Nibali, Pantani, Moser, etc.
Still we have this season to try and enjoyPure Class, Pure Grinta, Pure Heart, Pure Courage. His name will be remembered among the greatest of his generation.
We fans thank you for all the wonderful memories. Ciao Lo Squalo
I was misunderstood and was quoting a statement that had to do with chronology, not absolute rank. Naturally il Campionissimo Coppi goes down as first on the list, but the quote remarked that Nibali was the best since Gimondi's time.Even if you don't consider the prehistory of the sport... the most successful Italian rider was the Campionissimo, Fausto Coppi.
Then there is Bartali.
And then perhaps we can discuss Gimondi, Nibali, Pantani, Moser, etc.
This is a fair assessment.I was misunderstood and was quoting a statement that had to do with chronology, not absolute rank. Naturally il Campionissimo Coppi goes down as first on the list, but the quote remarked that Nibali was the best since Gimondi's time.
For those that were not yet following cycling during Pantani's career, I said he was something else because literally he was. When he won the Tour in the way he did with his legendary attack on the Galibier, he had an entire nation watching on TV, even those that were not strictly speaking cycling fans. In fact, the way Marco attacked and won in the mountains, even before his Giro and Tour double made him literally a living legend in Italy. Nibali never had that status, nor were his victories so appreciated. When Pantani destroyed Indurain on the Mortirolo, making him lose a Giro that would have been his third, one commentator said it was like watching a bull charging up the mountain. Then his disasterous fall in 95 to then come back and set the record time climing Alpe d'Huez at the 97 Tour had folks in Italy cheering as if it were the national team winning the World Cup. And what Pantani was doing at the 99 Giro, until his demise at Madonna di Campiglio, was the stuff of an il Campionissimo for Italians. Davide Casani said he never saw anbody climb like Pantani. When Pantani fell, Italian cycling as a national movement never entirely rebounded, despite what Bettini, Basso and then Nibali achieved. Everybody knew that when on his game, Pantani was simply the strongest climber in the world and one of the greatest, if not arguably the greatest, climbers of all time. He was simply irresistable in the mountains, an aspect of the sport Italians admire most, when in top form. Nibali has never been of that caliber, despite a phenomenal career. Peak Contador and Froome were superior to peak Nibali. Nibali is incredibly resourceful and longevous and probably achieved more on his talent than almost arguably anybody in the history of the sport, but he never was truely the top rider in any discipline the way Pantani was. Sorry for the rambling on and no disrespect to lo Squalo.
Again, nothing to take away from Nibali, but there was just something mythic about Pantani. The Romagnolo did things in the mountains that were legendary. He had carsima in a melancholic, even tragic way, despite being introverted and mistrustful of the press and organizations. And, like I said, he made people watch cycling who were not even tifosi. Nibali was less appreciated, unfortunately because he didn't enflame peoples' passions the way il Pirata did. He didn't do the same exploits either.This is a fair assessment.
I'd argue that Nibali was less appreciated partly because of the way Pantani went down. Cycling never rebounded, as you say, and an amazing champion like him never got the credit he deserves.
Again, nothing to take away from Nibali, but there was just something mythic about Pantani. The Romagnolo did things in the mountains that were legendary. He had carsima in a melancholic, even tragic way, despite being introverted and mistrustful of the press and organizations. And, like I said, he made people watch cycling who were not even tifosi. Nibali was less appreciated, unfortunately because he didn't enflame peoples' passions the way il Pirata did. He didn't do the same exploits either.