franic said:
Kwibus said:
Madre mia!
Oh god not this discussion again.
Stop wasting your time. We will never know, fact is Nibali won the tour and Contador/Froome crashed out. "What if" whatever you want it wont change a thing and I garantee it, you will never agree with eachother so this discussion is soooo pointless.
but it’s actually a matter of facts: Nibali was at least as strong as Contador in the mountains if you look at VAM and W/Kg data. Nibali started with over 2’30” on Contador, hence it was impossible to catch up.
Where did you get that from? That's pure random assumption. Funny thing is that Contador in the 3rd week of the Vuelta 14' was at least as strong as Nibali, and AC from the Vuelta was obviously not at his best, or at least not as good as in the Tour.
I find it funny that you've been comparing the Tour 2014 with the situation of the Tour 2013 between Froome and Contador and how Froome who had the same numbers as Nibali, was always dropping AC.
Is that your argument? Can you even begin to realise how stronger Contador 14' was compared to 2013?
And how can you say for sure that Contador was definetely not at his 09' level? When himself claimed that he had his best ever legs and that he had the same sensations as before the Tour 09'
Just go rewatch both Dauphiné 14' and Dauphiné 09".
And what do you make of Nibali's recovery vs incessant attacks from AC? He would've never been able to take it easy like he did on Risoul and plat d'adet and other stages where he finished with Péraud, keeping his strengh for Hautacam.
It was "free to play" for Nibali, he could do whatever he wanted against the french guys who were battling for second place, against Contador and Tinkoff, he would've been compelled to go through the roof every single mountain stage, let alone long ranged attacks from AC because that's what he would've ended up doing if MTF's were not enough.