rhubroma said:
cineteq said:
On the subject of "Nibali was lucky to win the Giro"
Kruijswijk said:
“But staying on your bike is also cycling and that’s what I lacked yesterday”
It's undeniable that Nibali was lucky to win this Giro, just as he was lucky his main rivals crashed out of the Tour he won, though he was beaten by Wiggins at the Tour and a 42 year-old Horner at the Vuelta, so I guess Fortune really is blind. And who was it that Enzo beat at the Vuelta? Ezequiel Mosquera Miguez Gómez. The guy was subsequently disqualified for doping, but dropped Nibs on Bola del Mundo. Not a stellar cyclist at least on my radar. And who was his biggest threat at the last Giro he won? Ciccio Uran...
He races with a big heart and has enough talent to capitalize on other's misfortunes, but if there is a rider who's been graced by good fortune it is certainly him. Thus as Wouter said above, he is the most overachieving cyclist of his generation in GTs.
Coincidentally... Nibali is always in the right place at the right time to grab the opportunity. The number of times it happened starts to be relevant
It takes more than luck
You can't capitalize on other's misfortunes if you're hidden in the peloton,cannot descend or without having a great cycling IQ (reading the race)
Drawing the line between what he deserves and what he does not is a futile attempt (unless he did something bad to undermine the competition which he didn't). Overachievers are those who,first and foremost,have achieved something.Being an overachiever is a merit not a concession. Being "the fittest that survives" is a merit itself,the only difference is that slighlty different abilities are required
I think most of your critique can be reduced to: "the best climber must win,otherwise It's not a legit win" which openly contrasts with the spirit of the race
It seems like everything that deviates from the norm must not be taken seriously. Why not award the prize to the "supposed" best climber before the race even starts?
That's why riders like nibali keeps competing. Because they feel they can bring many things to the table and challenge what's perceived to be more powerful. We're talking about pure power though. RAces don't happen in empty space where everything is predictable