Voeckler doping?

Page 14 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 26, 2009
4,114
0
0
Altitude said:
Are you under the impression that you don't suffer on dope?You still suffer, it just takes more effort to make it happen. You could have the greatest capacity for suffering on the planet, but that won't make up for lack of physical ability. Doping will.

Mancebo springs to mind.
 
Jul 21, 2011
13
0
0
Vockler unrealistic performance

I justed signed on the the forums today.

I don't keep up with all the specifics about cyclists who dope but Vocklers performance throughout this tour seems extremely suspect. Like someone else mentioned he has pulled a Rasmussen.

How does he ride so aggressively during the first week on the flat stages trying to get away from the peloton then climb into the yellow jersey and maintain it for so long? In the Pyrenees He was covering every single attack/acceleration all the while dancing on his pedals. Every other GC contender was heads down grinding it out and Vockler was at the front looking at everyone's face as if to say, "Hey guys aren't you going to go again?".

My BS meter just went off the charts seeing how fresh he looked/looks compared to everyone else. And they all let him get the yellow only because he was never expected to all of a sudden become a mtn climber.

I see his grimaces as a ploy for the cameras. When he jumps to cover an attack he looks so fresh!!! His domestique seemed to only be there for just in case he needed a bike change. It just doesn't seem very realistic. I guess France has their Lance Armstrong now. I wonder if the TDF is gonna let Vockler get away with it being that he is France's hero. After all he has increased viewership in France which means more $$$ for all involved at the TDF.

Yeah I'm jaded. :mad:
 
Mar 27, 2010
1,781
46
10,530
Wrong forum, check the clinic.

Also if any rider is probably not doping it's Voeckler.
 
Jul 16, 2011
268
61
9,130
Honestly guys... just from the title of this thread, it clearly belongs in the Clinic... Don't ruin all our fun please.
 
Aug 3, 2009
3,217
1
13,485
The dichotomy in this thread is reaching epic proportions, even for the clinic.

In multiple threads here and in the Pro Cycling forum, we see repeated, measured, discussions on the lack of chasing by contenders, levels of indecision re: when to chase, lower and less than otherworldly VAM numbers, reduced wattage on climbs, slower times on climbs, etc.

Over here, all we get is Voeckler matching numerous attacks of Biblical proportions, responding to the greatest climbers in the world racing at their limits, beating the dopers who are juiced to the gills suggesting that he too is doped to the gills (or even further), and a host of other posts suggesting this is the hardest Tour since Maurice Garin was riding.

It's like there are two Tours this year: the one that everyone outside this thread is watching, and the one that is apparently being broadcast to a select few posting in here.
 
Feb 25, 2011
2,538
0
11,480
MacRoadie said:
The dichotomy in this thread is reaching epic proportions, even for the clinic.

In multiple threads here and in the Pro Cycling forum, we see repeated, measured, discussions on the lack of chasing by contenders, levels of indecision re: when to chase, lower and less than otherworldly VAM numbers, reduced wattage on climbs, slower times on climbs, etc.

Over here, all we get is Voeckler matching numerous attacks of Biblical proportions, responding to the greatest climbers in the world racing at their limits, beating the dopers who are juiced to the gills suggesting that he too is doped to the gills (or even further), and a host of other posts suggesting this is the hardest Tour since Maurice Garin was riding.

It's like there are two Tours this year: the one that everyone outside this thread is watching, and the one that is apparently being broadcast to a select few posting in here.
touché.

it has been pretty tame :p
 
May 26, 2009
10,230
579
24,080
MacRoadie said:
The dichotomy in this thread is reaching epic proportions, even for the clinic.

In multiple threads here and in the Pro Cycling forum, we see repeated, measured, discussions on the lack of chasing by contenders, levels of indecision re: when to chase, lower and less than otherworldly VAM numbers, reduced wattage on climbs, slower times on climbs, etc.

Over here, all we get is Voeckler matching numerous attacks of Biblical proportions, responding to the greatest climbers in the world racing at their limits, beating the dopers who are juiced to the gills suggesting that he too is doped to the gills (or even further), and a host of other posts suggesting this is the hardest Tour since Maurice Garin was riding.

Obviously those things are all factors, but how have they only benefitted Voeckler and nobody else? Where are all the other cyclists who can now keep up with the slower times up the mountains, and are now taking advantage of the indecision of the big guys?

Come on, today we saw Contador and Sanchez dropping off the back of a lead group containing Voeckler while they were going up the Galibier. In the third week of a grand tour.

If Voeckler was less likeable, everybody would be screaming that he is a doper.

It's nice that people can still have faith, but the recent history of cycling is a pretty solid base to argue upon against a 32-year old puncheur mixing it up with the best GT riders of the last 5 years.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
a stupid question - how did voeckler himself explain his surprising performance ?

i mean i did come across his own assessments about grit and luck but has he claimed changing anything in his basic training and preparation ?

such as - new altitude training routine, lower body weight, new coach etc.

i know a rider can use these claims as a smoke screen for doping but did voeckler use ANY smoke screen picked up by the media or bloggers?
 
Aug 12, 2009
505
0
0
python said:
a stupid question - how did voeckler himself explain his surprising performance ?

i mean i did come across his own assessments about grit and luck but has he claimed changing anything in his basic training and preparation ?

such as - new altitude training routine, lower body weight, new coach etc.

i know a rider can use these claims as a smoke screen for doping but did voeckler use ANY smoke screen picked up by the media or bloggers?

very interesting question! all I heard from him was that he thinks he can never win and that he will suc* in the mountains etc. No actual explanation from voeckler came across my eyes or ears. :confused:
 

Latest posts