It would force no-one to do anything. Pogacar was the best in the TT and the best at climbing. It would bring no balance either because Pogacar would eat Remco in the mountains. So there is that!
um...duh.
i wasn't directing this at benefitting remco in particular, that wasn't the point. My point was that GCs should always have a balanced amount of TT kms, because it is the race of truth, beautiful to watch, and should come into play in deciding the best all-rounder in a race -- yes, even if that means rog and pog win by more!
i'm talking about the yates, carapaz, gaudu, etc... these climbers masquerading as GC favorites that have been all the vogue in recent years.
a lengthy TT can also serve to force a pure climber to over-extend themselves and wear themselves out defending against massive losses. they can often then not perform as expected in the mountains (yates in 2018 giro for example). GTs used to have that all the time -- the longer flat stages and TTs actually wore down the pure climbers who rarely performed to expectations when it came to the mountains. It is why true all-rounders like Merckx, Hinault, and Lemond often outperformed pure climbers in the mountains of a GT.
if you shorten stages and have virtually no ITT, now you have riders simply fighting it out for seconds at the tops of MTFs -- something everyone complains about.