Volta ao Algarve em Bicicleta 2020, Portugal, February 19 - February 23

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 23, 2018
1,125
345
5,180
I have no idea what kind of money sprinters even make in this business. I saw an article couple years back but that covered the GC guys like Froome, Valverde etc.
 
Seems that the jury is already out there for Viviani and its not even march yet.
90% of riders see a decline after leaving DQS. He was never a sure thing prior the Quick-Step either. His lead out now consists of Sabatini and Consonni. One has no idea what's going on most of the time and the latter seems to put more care into his own 7th place than the result of his leader.
 
Jan 22, 2016
58
6
8,695
I think it's too early to judge what he can achieve, next week he will be at the Track World Championship and last week he was training on track with the national team. Maybe today's stage was a bit too hard for the kind of form he has right now.


That said I think he can still win important races but nobody expect him to win as much as he did in the last two years.
 

Bonimenier

BANNED
Apr 1, 2019
4,291
5,930
16,180
I think it's too early to judge what he can achieve, next week he will be at the Track World Championship and last week he was training on track with the national team. Maybe today's stage was a bit too hard for the kind of form he has right now.


That said I think he can still win important races but nobody expect him to win as much as he did in the last two years.
I actually think his form is pretty decent at the moment. He was pretty good in a reasonable hard Cadel Evans Race and the Track WC probably is a rather big goal for him so he'll wanna be in form. He obviously is a good sprinter but there are a few who are just faster.
 

KZD

Feb 21, 2019
4,361
7,033
16,180
Jakobsen looks in great shape.
Van der Poel's work ended up completely wasted, Modolo was nowhere to be seen.
Tomorrow I don't expect almost any differences among the overall contenders.
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
I mean, leaving QS will make your leadout worse no matter where you end up, but why did he go to Cofidis of all places? To ride with his Brother? Money? Certainly not for the chance of winning a lot of races.

Cofidis are among the most notorious over payers in the peloton. Any agent of any rider who has just had two hot years should be all over them.
 
May 27, 2016
696
52
10,080
steppers ruining cycling with their dominance
Of course they win a lot of races, but I don't feel they are dominating cycling. Most of the time they are nowhere to be seen in the GC's and teams like Bora, Jumbo, Ineos and UEA are basically the same level, but aiming for different results.
 
May 5, 2010
51,808
30,359
28,180
I mean, leaving QS will make your leadout worse no matter where you end up, but why did he go to Cofidis of all places? To ride with his Brother? Money? Certainly not for the chance of winning a lot of races.

Didn't Elia sign with Cofidis before Attilio did?
 
Jun 6, 2017
6,170
3,703
23,180
Of course they win a lot of races, but I don't feel they are dominating cycling. Most of the time they are nowhere to be seen in the GC's and teams like Bora, Jumbo, Ineos and UEA are basically the same level, but aiming for different results.
Only Ineos comes close to steppers...
 
May 11, 2017
280
61
9,130
90% of riders see a decline after leaving DQS.
That's simply not true. I can write you at least 10 riders who have stayed at the same level or have done better: Poels, Kwiato, De Gendt, De Plus, Schachmann, Pauwels, Gaviria, Ciolek, Cavendish, Uran... Waiting for those 90 who declined.
 
Feb 20, 2012
54,043
44,425
28,180
I have no idea what kind of money sprinters even make in this business. I saw an article couple years back but that covered the GC guys like Froome, Valverde etc.
I think it depends a lot on if they also lead the cobbled classics, or otherwise if they're the top sprinter that wins 4 TdF stages.
 
Mar 13, 2015
420
10,024
9,980
The jury was out when DQS decided they rather roll with Jakobsen.
I’m not sure that gives the whole situation. It’s very well known that Lefevere won’t break the bank to keep riders when he’s got new ones coming through as seen every year. He’ll only pay to keep the ones that win and keep his sponsors on board, at the moment I’d think that only Alaphilippe and Evenepoel are untouchables.
 
Jun 6, 2017
6,170
3,703
23,180
It doesn't show really:

1. DQS - 68 wins - 9314 points
2 JV - 51 wins - 8279 points
3 Bora - 47 wins - 8181 points
4 INEOS - 26 wins - 7929 points.
In the last 7-8 years, we really have only two dominant teams, and those are Quick Step and Ineos (Sky). One team dominates in the Classics and sprints, and the other dominates in Grand Tour racing.
There were attempts of other teams during these years to break this dominance, teams like Movistar, Tinkoff, Astana, BMC, and most lately Bora and Jumbo. But not one of these teams succeeded in that. QS and Ineos are still the benchmark for all other teams. If some team wants to make impact in Classics, he needs to think how is he going to beat the steppers, same with GT's and Ineos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joelsim
Feb 20, 2012
54,043
44,425
28,180
I’m not sure that gives the whole situation. It’s very well known that Lefevere won’t break the bank to keep riders when he’s got new ones coming through as seen every year. He’ll only pay to keep the ones that win and keep his sponsors on board, at the moment I’d think that only Alaphilippe and Evenepoel are untouchables.
Long term I think only Evenepoel is untouchable. Alaphilippe basically has had one really crazy season in which he still failed to deliver in Liege and in which the much hyped Tour was likely a fluke.
 

Bonimenier

BANNED
Apr 1, 2019
4,291
5,930
16,180
That's simply not true. I can write you at least 10 riders who have stayed at the same level or have done better: Poels, Kwiato, De Gendt, De Plus, Schachmann, Pauwels, Gaviria, Ciolek, Cavendish, Uran... Waiting for those 90 who declined.
90% is obviously an exaggeration, but your list of riders isn't exactly great. Guys like Kwiat, Schachmann and De Plus did leave quite young so was to be expected they weren't going to fall of a cliff yet. Then there also a few guys you name who did do worse after they left like Gaviria and Cavendish. You could have done a better job naming 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaylew
Apr 19, 2014
2,519
231
11,880
Long term I think only Evenepoel is untouchable. Alaphilippe basically has had one really crazy season in which he still failed to deliver in Liege and in which the much hyped Tour was likely a fluke.

It got him one hell of a contract last season, so for the next few years he'll ride for QS.
 
Feb 20, 2012
54,043
44,425
28,180
It got him one hell of a contract last season, so for the next few years he'll ride for QS.
Sure. But unless he has a huge classic season or wins the WC/OG or confirms himself as Tour contender, I think it's more hype than substance. Last year basically made him a better Voeckler in regards of the Tour de France.
 
Oct 31, 2018
576
715
11,780
Long term I think only Evenepoel is untouchable. Alaphilippe basically has had one really crazy season in which he still failed to deliver in Liege and in which the much hyped Tour was likely a fluke.

That's a bit harsh considering he also won strade, MSR and Fleche Walloon in 2019 along with several top 5 en top 10 places.
Arguably he's was the best cyclist in the world in 2019.
 
May 11, 2017
280
61
9,130
90% is obviously an exaggeration, but your list of riders isn't exactly great. Guys like Kwiat, Schachmann and De Plus did leave quite young so was to be expected they weren't going to fall of a cliff yet. Then there also a few guys you name who did do worse after they left like Gaviria and Cavendish. You could have done a better job naming 10.
If you're going to exclude those who do not fit to the notion then yes, it might be 90%.

Both Gaviria and Cavendish scored more PCS points in a season following their departure from QS. Gaviria's even been injured. Cav obviously declined but as a result of leaving QS? That's nonsense.

And you're right, there are more riders to add to the list which proves the premise ridiculous.