• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Volta Ciclista a Catalunya 2023, March 20-26

Page 56 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
As for Evenepoel flipping the GC on Sunday, here's why that's unlikely.
Final circuit:
07ZXUCq.png
There's barely any flat on the circuit, and the false flats are downhill. That means Evenepoel pretty much has to make his move(s) on the climbs, where his comparative advantage over Roglic is minimal or nonexistent on paper. It's also almost completely on wide roads, which makes it harder for Roglic to be caught out by poor positioning. And everyone else is decently far down on GC, so Roglic probably won't have to waste his bullets chasing down Almeida.

In other words, there's a reason the GC lead basically never flips here. Yes, Evenepoel will have an easier time keeping a gap than pretty much anyone else, but unless Roglic is on a lesser day (when the murito stage was his best day in Tirreno), I have a hard time seeing him getting that gap.
 
As for Evenepoel flipping the GC on Sunday, here's why that's unlikely.

There's barely any flat on the circuit, and the false flats are downhill. That means Evenepoel pretty much has to make his move(s) on the climbs, where his comparative advantage over Roglic is minimal or nonexistent on paper. It's also almost completely on wide roads, which makes it harder for Roglic to be caught out by poor positioning. And everyone else is decently far down on GC, so Roglic probably won't have to waste his bullets chasing down Almeida.

In other words, there's a reason the GC lead basically never flips here. Yes, Evenepoel will have an easier time keeping a gap than pretty much anyone else, but unless Roglic is on a lesser day (when the murito stage was his best day in Tirreno), I have a hard time seeing him getting that gap.
The stage is not hard enough and Roglic only has to mark Remco. Montjuic is not hard enough for Remco to make gaps easy unless Roglic has a bad day. In classics there is usually more than one contender and recovery does not come into play. I think Remco is far more explosive when he is well-rested.
 
It is the perfect climb for huge watts, though - unipuerto by necessity and starting at close to sea level.
looking at the time, it doesn't seem like 'huge' watts for an easy stage though. Maybe considering they haven't peaked yet... (= 6.6W/kg for 23minutes)


Almeida was also looking good today. Don't think the Giro will be solely between Roglic and Remco Their rivalery might give other a better chance.
 
Here Remco erred in opening up the sprint from too far out, against one who is a mountain sprinter specialist. Poor tactic. He still likely would have lost, but on the wheel and not at 6 secs.

Yes, he started an all-out effort too soon probably expecting Primoz to be weaker or just made a mistake. But Primoz today in the finale was stronger than before.
 
Has he ever needed that much time to find his top form though? He was clearly somewhat behind at Tirreno, but by now I'm not sure he has that much more room for improvement compared to Remco going towards the Giro.
He's never been in the situation were he had bone graft surgery and was completely off the bike for 2 months. So I'm sure not even he knows how long it'll be to find top form. And with a chronically injured shoulder fixed even what his top form might be!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
He's never been in the situation were he had bone graft surgery and was completely off the bike for 2 months. So I'm sure not even he knows how long it'll be to find top form. And with a chronically injured shoulder fixed even what his top form might be!

I haven't seen any rider not cycling when he has an upper body surgery/problem. They just ride stationary/hometrainer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Doopie
looking at the time, it doesn't seem like 'huge' watts for an easy stage though. Maybe considering they haven't peaked yet... (= 6.6W/kg for 23minutes)


Almeida was also looking good today. Don't think the Giro will be solely between Roglic and Remco Their rivalery might give other a better chance.

I retract what i said:
View: https://twitter.com/ammattipyoraily/status/1639316234079551498?cxt=HHwWlIC-7b3bgsAtAAAA
 
He's never been in the situation were he had bone graft surgery and was completely off the bike for 2 months. So I'm sure not even he knows how long it'll be to find top form. And with a chronically injured shoulder fixed even what his top form might be!
Realistically his final repaired shoulder should allow him greater overall flexibility. That should also translate into more relaxed, prolonged efforts and greater strength in his upper body. We could be seeing the start of a new top peak for Roglic. He's not a geriatric so arguments about aging are starting to fall away. Sprinting decline is allegedly the first attribute to define an aged cyclist. That doesn't seem to be suffering at the moment.
 
VAM should be pretty simple to calculate, so I guess it‘s legit.

Not necessarily. There can be various vertical profiles of a climb that could alter calculations. It can be true especially for climbs rarely used (like this one). Pogacar and Vingegaard never reached 1850 m/h for 24 minutes on sub 10% climbs (Pog's 1840 m/h on Peyresourde must be the closest). So 1925 m/h is either an ET performance (even considering low elevation and uni-puerto stage) or something is off with calculations.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Realistically his final repaired shoulder should allow him greater overall flexibility. That should also translate into more relaxed, prolonged efforts and greater strength in his upper body. We could be seeing the start of a new top peak for Roglic. He's not a geriatric so arguments about aging are starting to fall away. Sprinting decline is allegedly the first attribute to define an aged cyclist. That doesn't seem to be suffering at the moment.

Exactly what I was trying to say ).
 
Not necessarily. There can be various vertical profiles of a climb that could alter calculations. It can be true especially for climbs rarely used (like this one). Pogacar and Vingegaard never reached 1850 m/h for 24 minutes on sub 10% climbs (Pog's 1840 m/h on Peyresourde must be the closest). So 1925 m/h is either an ET performance (even considering low elevation and uni-puerto stage) or something is off with calculations.
It's just simply the perfect VAM climb.

Peyresourde was on the back of Balès, 600 m higher, and with 1.2 percentage point lower average gradient.
 

TRENDING THREADS