Why we have sprint stages...
I am going to continue to sign in on sprint tactics cause they are too oft ignored.
Seem we can't watch hours of racing everyday, can we? That's why we have sprint stages - so we only have to watch the last 5 or 10 kilometers or so...
SO, stop whining about boring sprint stages, get a life and get on your bike! (or your chosen vehicle to enlightenment.)
But the sprint was really interesting. I don't know what lead up to the circumstances that took out the HTC and Garmin leadout trains (and others, probably). Quick Step seemed to use themselves up too early, and I think Sky did too, leaving energy centered around the Milram train (of two or three only). Cav went waaaay early, at least 300m out by my eye, way to early, and Tyler Farrar started a battle for his wheel. So Cav lead Farrar out, and Fernandez came from somewhere...and Petacchi just looked kind of slow, his tempo was obviously very slow relative to the riders around him.
This is a very different set of circumstances, with Cav and Farrar with no teammates in the end....and who came out on top but Tyler Farrar!!!
Now we could discount this as poor tactics by Cav, who didn't have the fortune to be leadout by such a talented, loyal, and self-sacrificing team.
Or...just maybe he went early as a deliberate tactic to show that he can't win without them!?!
Or...maybe he was just out of options and found himself in the wind with 350m to go. This may be the favored explanation.
But a couple of Vuelta stages ago I noted that Farrar went first as a tactic to disrupt the HTC-Columbia dominance by making them react, since too often Cav is able to start his sprint at exactly the spot most favorable to him.
What say ye?