Great ride by Pogi! Let's see how the ITT goes now.
Chaves needs a hug. He looked like he was about to cry. His Vuelta has gone to pieces. Time to recover.
Sponsors care for him, but the team not so much...So if that is the issue do not bring Quintana to the Vuelta. If the team and sponsors don't care for him don't bring him the Vuelta. But don't show the world this lack of professionalism!
Sponsors care for him, but the team not so much...
Anyway, it was a bad call, they've lost the stage and didn't gain on Roglic with that call.
Valverde wasn't dragging no one. Please stop this shitty narrative.Bad call? Quintana gained time and got 6 bonus seconds and is now in red. The bad call was Valverde trying close the gap, dragging their biggest rival closer allowing him to minimize his time losses and then conceding the bonus seconds.
Today was a huge win for Roglic.So after all that there are still no meaningful gaps between the top guys, which means it's another win for Roglic.
Explain to me the tactical benefit of what he did?Valverde wasn't dragging no one. Please stop this shitty narrative.
Valverde dragged who?! Do you even know the basics of cycling racing?Bad call? Quintana gained time and got 6 bonus seconds and is now in red. The bad call was Valverde trying close the gap, dragging their biggest rival closer allowing him to minimize his time losses and then conceding the bonus seconds.
This narrative exists because Valverde has given many occasions to believe itValverde wasn't dragging no one. Please stop this shitty narrative.
Do you even know cycling? Valverde attacking doesn't make Roglic or Lopez ride faster up a hill after a brutal stage on +8%. They all ride with what they have, regardless of Valverde is attacking. Lopez was cooked so naturally, Valverde needs to go and gain time on him as well.Explain to me the tactical benefit of what he did?
I just noticed . . . no goatee for Roglic.
Tactical benefit was that he was gaining time on two closest rivals.Explain to me the tactical benefit of what he did?
The narrative exists because people simply dont understand how cycling really works, are listening to commentators, haven't sat on a bike or are just plain stupid. Sorry to tell you the truth.This narrative exists because Valverde has given many occasions to believe it
Roglic to catch Lopéz in the ITT. Yay or nay?
Soler was with Valverde/Quintana etc before Image breakdown, no? So he must have dropped them
Tell me, what difference doesthat exactly make? Much more effective to go in a more linear pace as well - not a given he could have followed him all the way if he waited on Rogla. And how should he even know that?Roglic was strong and he was closing the gap so I think shouldn't have attacked and wait to be dragged by roglic. But it's easy to speak after the race
Valverde dragged who?! Do you even know the basics of cycling racing?
Quintana was gaining time without Soler just fine, he would've get at least 4 sec bonus in worst scenario. This way they only denied Soler probably the biggest win of his career, and created some bad atmosphere in the team.
Oh, and Quintana won't be in red longer than a day!
Valverde dragged who?! Do you even know the basics of cycling racing?
Quintana was gaining time without Soler just fine, he would've get at least 4 sec bonus in worst scenario. This way they only denied Soler probably the biggest win of his career, and created some bad atmosphere in the team.
Oh, and Quintana won't be in red longer than a day!