well he was Junior XCO world champion and 4th next year in U23. also he got better skills than 2/3 of the XCO riders anyways. he'll do just fine - top10 is possible if everything goes well.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
SKSemtex said:KGB said:Of course any DS will allowed him to race if Specialized wants him there(They will pay some part of his wage.50% ?).SKSemtex said:46&twoWheels said:hopefully not a broken bone
this.
He is lucky ba....d that Tinkoff is folding . No way any other team owner or DS would have allowed him to race.
Podium or last one. it does not matter. Lets hope he will be without any injury after the race. Spring 2017 should be his one.
He is risking serious injury there. Whole season can be in danger. It's not gonna be Champ Elysees sunday ride for him.
But probably you are right. Who knows?
waw. Now I finally understand what Vino option really mean in pools.doperhopper said:Vino option: you have a few million deep budget... ;-) ;-)
So you tihink he stripped of olympic games MTNiker who who really deserved it just for fun?Keram said:I don´t think it is all about money. I think Sagan doing this for fun. He likes MTB more than road because it is pure action compared to most of cycling stages (at least first part of it, when he is pedalling in bunch). Anyway top 10 would be huge acomplishment for him. But you should never underestimate Peter Sagan
Kokoso said:So you tihink he stripped of olympic games MTNiker who who really deserved it just for fun?Keram said:I don´t think it is all about money. I think Sagan doing this for fun. He likes MTB more than road because it is pure action compared to most of cycling stages (at least first part of it, when he is pedalling in bunch). Anyway top 10 would be huge acomplishment for him. But you should never underestimate Peter Sagan
That certainly doesn't make it better for me. You can have fun other ways :Neutral:
yetiyeti said:Kokoso said:So you tihink he stripped of olympic games MTNiker who who really deserved it just for fun?Keram said:I don´t think it is all about money. I think Sagan doing this for fun. He likes MTB more than road because it is pure action compared to most of cycling stages (at least first part of it, when he is pedalling in bunch). Anyway top 10 would be huge acomplishment for him. But you should never underestimate Peter Sagan
That certainly doesn't make it better for me. You can have fun other ways :Neutral:
Just because Sagan wants to do it, in part, because it will be fun for him doesn't mean he won't outperform what Slovakia's alternative representatives would have been for mountain biking. The bottom line is that the other guys just aren't that good on the world stage and there's a very good chance that Sagan is strong enough to provide a better result for Slovakia. By the way, one of them is taking Sagan's spot in the road race, so he's still getting to ride in the Olympics.
yetiyeti said:By the way, one of them is taking Sagan's spot in the road race, so he's still getting to ride in the Olympics.
Keram said:yetiyeti said:Kokoso said:So you tihink he stripped of olympic games MTNiker who who really deserved it just for fun?Keram said:I don´t think it is all about money. I think Sagan doing this for fun. He likes MTB more than road because it is pure action compared to most of cycling stages (at least first part of it, when he is pedalling in bunch). Anyway top 10 would be huge acomplishment for him. But you should never underestimate Peter Sagan
That certainly doesn't make it better for me. You can have fun other ways :Neutral:
Just because Sagan wants to do it, in part, because it will be fun for him doesn't mean he won't outperform what Slovakia's alternative representatives would have been for mountain biking. The bottom line is that the other guys just aren't that good on the world stage and there's a very good chance that Sagan is strong enough to provide a better result for Slovakia. By the way, one of them is taking Sagan's spot in the road race, so he's still getting to ride in the Olympics.
No he is not. Patrik Tybor is going. It is highly possible that Sagan is best slovak mountain biker now even without decent training. We can discuss it really long time if it is fair from Sagan. But I am quite sure that majority of slovak fans dont blame Sagan for doing this.
Armchair cyclist said:I guess that if the answer were yes, they would have been training for it for the last few months, but could the top Cyclo-Cross guys have been competitive in this if they had made it a focus since the end of their season, or if they had done last summer plus this? The skil sets look fairly compatible from my limited viewing of each discipline.
Might it have been a better way of using his summer for Matthieu Van Der Poel than coming 8th in the Ronde van Limburg?
King Boonen said:Armchair cyclist said:I guess that if the answer were yes, they would have been training for it for the last few months, but could the top Cyclo-Cross guys have been competitive in this if they had made it a focus since the end of their season, or if they had done last summer plus this? The skil sets look fairly compatible from my limited viewing of each discipline.
Might it have been a better way of using his summer for Matthieu Van Der Poel than coming 8th in the Ronde van Limburg?
Mathieu Van Der Poel, tried to do exactly this. He raced several MTB races including 3 WC XCO races where he finished 32, 34 and 91. Remeber he is the current CX elite world champion and 2 time junior CX world champion/1 time Junior road champion, so if any CX rider could do it it should be him.
The skill sets used to be more compatible, and to some extent they still are at national level in non-MTB countries, but at WC level they really aren't. XCO racing has got much, much more technical over the past few years. Kenta Gallagher, a promising XCO racer is now doing very well on the UCI DH WC circuit. Nino Schurter, Julien Absalon et. al. can rip down trails on their 100ish mm travel bikes with massive seat posts that most casual riders would want 140mm+ travel and a dropper post to even attempt.
There are 5-6 guys I can name who should straight up leave Sagan in their dust both uphill and downhill, even if his skills are up to scratch. There are several others who should smoke him on the downhills and easily keep up with him on the climbs. I think top 10 is a realistic goal at best, but we shall see.
King Boonen said:Possibly more exciting in the short term. I've recently stopped MTB riding due to time constraints but still follow it and love getting out into the hills. The Rio course is very easy compared to a real XCO course, like La Bresse:
http://www.pinkbike.com/news/solid-as-a-rock-practice-world-cup-xco-3-2016.html
But he's still going to have to match Schurter, Absalon, Kulhavy, Marotte, Vogel etc. in those rocks and gullies and that's going to be very difficult. Where he'll really suffer is the climbs, MTB riders who cross over usually end up as good climbers, possibly with a kick.
Personally I think Sagan getting a medal is bad for MTB. It pretty much shows it's a second class citizen that riders can just swap into if they feel like it (even though Sagan is obviously experienced and very talented).
It's worthwhile checking out the downhill racing too, shows why people who ride MTB tend to have much, much better bike handling skills than roadies. This is this weekends WC track in MSA, one of the best tracks in the world:
http://www.pinkbike.com/news/claudios-course-preview-monte-sainte-anne-world-cup-dh-2016.html
This is a great video to show what Sagan is up against when it comes to the downhills:
http://www.pinkbike.com/news/Opposites-Attract-Brendan-Fairclough-and-Nino-Schurter-ride-the-EWS-final-in-Finale-Ligure-Italy-video-2013.html
Just to show who he's riding with there, this is Brendog at Rampage in 2014:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIXuC8uQyig
If you've considered that I imply even win is possible surely wou would understood that I think Sagan can outperform other Slovakia representatives. But what is this argument good for? Are Olympic games just for money? Or just for win? For me neither. Sagan fans are forgetting what is sport or at least what Olympic games are about. And don't tell me "it's all about money" argument. Those who deserved to represent Slovakia should participate. But how did they end up?yetiyeti said:Kokoso said:So you tihink he stripped of olympic games MTNiker who who really deserved it just for fun?Keram said:I don´t think it is all about money. I think Sagan doing this for fun. He likes MTB more than road because it is pure action compared to most of cycling stages (at least first part of it, when he is pedalling in bunch). Anyway top 10 would be huge acomplishment for him. But you should never underestimate Peter Sagan
That certainly doesn't make it better for me. You can have fun other ways :Neutral:
Just because Sagan wants to do it, in part, because it will be fun for him doesn't mean he won't outperform what Slovakia's alternative representatives would have been for mountain biking. The bottom line is that the other guys just aren't that good on the world stage and there's a very good chance that Sagan is strong enough to provide a better result for Slovakia. By the way, one of them is taking Sagan's spot in the road race, so he's still getting to ride in the Olympics.
They end up empty handed. At first Slovakian cycling federation said ok one of them will do road race in exchange (not the one who should do MTB race but his substitute), farce still but at least it made some sense. But in the end Tybor will do RR and no one of guys who deserved to represent Slovakia will represent. Even bigger farce.By the way, one of them is taking Sagan's spot in the road race, so he's still getting to ride in the Olympics.
Well, it's about representing your own country. 300 000 people from Slovakia will watch MTB race. If Lami is there nobody cares about it. So I think that Slovak Cycling Federation made a good decision to delegate Sagan.If you've considered that I imply even win is possible surely wou would understood that I think Sagan can outperform other Slovakia representatives. But what is this argument good for? Are Olympic games just for money? Or just for win?
Representing one's country is not the same as number of TV viewers. You are mixing it together.Lance Armstrong said:Well, it's about representing your own country. 300 000 people from Slovakia will watch MTB race. If Lami is there nobody cares about it. So I think that Slovak Cycling Federation made a good decision to delegate Sagan.If you've considered that I imply even win is possible surely wou would understood that I think Sagan can outperform other Slovakia representatives. But what is this argument good for? Are Olympic games just for money? Or just for win?
Kokoso said:Representing one's country is not the same as number of TV viewers. You are mixing it together.Lance Armstrong said:Well, it's about representing your own country. 300 000 people from Slovakia will watch MTB race. If Lami is there nobody cares about it. So I think that Slovak Cycling Federation made a good decision to delegate Sagan.If you've considered that I imply even win is possible surely wou would understood that I think Sagan can outperform other Slovakia representatives. But what is this argument good for? Are Olympic games just for money? Or just for win?
So are you saying that it's right that Sagan replaced that two guys who are responsible for one Slovak place in MTB race? Mind you, without them Sagan couldn't race it.
Oh you've said that Nice, after defending him...hypocrisy coat undressedSKSemtex said:Kokoso said:Representing one's country is not the same as number of TV viewers. You are mixing it together.Lance Armstrong said:Well, it's about representing your own country. 300 000 people from Slovakia will watch MTB race. If Lami is there nobody cares about it. So I think that Slovak Cycling Federation made a good decision to delegate Sagan.If you've considered that I imply even win is possible surely wou would understood that I think Sagan can outperform other Slovakia representatives. But what is this argument good for? Are Olympic games just for money? Or just for win?
So are you saying that it's right that Sagan replaced that two guys who are responsible for one Slovak place in MTB race? Mind you, without them Sagan couldn't race it.
waw. I have some problem to understand this.
OK IT IS NOT FAIR. Deal with it.
With the OG it's not always about who gained the points during 2y qualification - it's often about who is the best option available. Sagan is clearly better than Lami and is available so he gets the spot. Same goes for the other countries and other disciplines.Kokoso said:Representing one's country is not the same as number of TV viewers. You are mixing it together.Lance Armstrong said:Well, it's about representing your own country. 300 000 people from Slovakia will watch MTB race. If Lami is there nobody cares about it. So I think that Slovak Cycling Federation made a good decision to delegate Sagan.If you've considered that I imply even win is possible surely wou would understood that I think Sagan can outperform other Slovakia representatives. But what is this argument good for? Are Olympic games just for money? Or just for win?
So are you saying that it's right that Sagan replaced that two guys who are responsible for one Slovak place in MTB race? Mind you, without them Sagan couldn't race it.
If that only was true...but Skarnitzl beat him. It's nothing more than speculation that Sagan is better than Lami. Wishful thinking of his fans. Lami probably is worse than Skarnitzl but maybe not that much. In 2014 Lami had more points, though I don't know races in detail . But whatever.glassmoon said:Without preparation, Sagan is on the level of Skarnitzl (cze)Kokoso said:Representing one's country is not the same as number of TV viewers. You are mixing it together.Lance Armstrong said:Well, it's about representing your own country. 300 000 people from Slovakia will watch MTB race. If Lami is there nobody cares about it. So I think that Slovak Cycling Federation made a good decision to delegate Sagan.If you've considered that I imply even win is possible surely wou would understood that I think Sagan can outperform other Slovakia representatives. But what is this argument good for? Are Olympic games just for money? Or just for win?
So are you saying that it's right that Sagan replaced that two guys who are responsible for one Slovak place in MTB race? Mind you, without them Sagan couldn't race it.
I don't know if it's against the rules, I don't know Slovak qualyfing rules.But obviously it is not. My opinion on fair/not fair is clear, no speculationIs it fair? We could speculate. Is it against the rules? No.
That's IMHO BS, Slovakia is not that big country to make huge PR boost and even if there is huge PR boost, that itself doesn't translate to bigger money or whatever. Sagan will have huge PR boost (already has), not MTB. I think this argument is made up to justify the unfairness you perceive.]Other significant aspect is a huge PR boost for XCO/MTB which should be in the interest of all mtb riders (Lami including).
That's a good point. It is valid for guys who actualy ARE doing that sport regularly and only get better than other guys from given country. But it is not valid for guys who actualy don't race that sport - and that's Sagan's case. Mind you it is only speculation that he would actually finished worse than Sagan. Sagan once crashed and once finished more than minute behind Skarnitzl (who had comfortable margin to second place so maybe didn't go full gas) - not exactly great. Something like that Lami might have achived too.With the OG it's not always about who gained the points during 2y qualification - it's often about who is the best option available.