What do you think of the Dr Maserati permaban?

[krebs303]

I am now in northern Italy IP

 

[MarkvW]

Probably why he used the term "evidence" instead of "proof".

Maserati was a little more literate than Bluenote appears to be. We also need to see whether Bluenote brings the same level of cycling knowledge that Maserati did. The jury's still out.

 

[red_flanders]

Mas was many things. A sockpuppet? Hard for me to believe. I feel like he was much too earnest for that.

Anything is possible, but if I'm betting, I don't figure that's the way he'd go about it.

 

[Benotti69]

Mas is on twitter giving his opinion about the clinic for those interested.

 

[ebandit]

Mas is on twitter giving his opinion about the clinic for those interested.

Trying to start a flame war, Bennotty?......classy

Mark L

 

[Granville57]

Mas is on twitter giving his opinion about the clinic for those interested.

Not since August, and it was mostly based around this mysterious thing, that he apparently couldn't understand, called a "vortex."

 

[Benotti69]

Not since August, and it was mostly based around this mysterious thing, that he apparently couldn't understand, called a "vortex."

Dr. Michele Maserati @DrMaserati · Oct 23

https://twitter.com/drMaserati/with_replies

 

[Granville57]

Dr. Michele Maserati @DrMaserati · Oct 23

https://twitter.com/drMaserati/with_replies

OK, and...?

The only tweets on that page that apply to this forum are dated from August.

The only tweet with the date "Oct 23" attached to it is:

Dr. Michele Maserati @DrMaserati · Oct 23
@dwuori Fontastic

 

[Semper Fidelis]

Allow me to confirm what the truth is here.

Bluenote is not Dr. Maserati. For proof, I will site IP addresses. The two do not share a single IP that is even remotely similar.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Good scoop.

 

[thehog]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Good scoop.

Koren spambot has been fudging IPs for a good few weeks now so not likely that users could fake their IP address

 

[Ferminal]

Pretty insulting to be accused of using standard routes when trying to avoid detection...

 

[Afrank]

Koren spambot has been fudging IPs for a good few weeks now so not likely that users could fake their IP address

There's no need to check any IP with the spammers, you can tell who they are with a single glance.

And even if you do check their IP's you can find similarities to past spammers. So they're not exactly doing a good job "fudging IPs."

 

[thehog]

Actually it's vlassic Jocueim/Statue, I've changed my position.

Not Dr. M, but a good impression nevertheless.

 

[TheSpud]

Actually it's vlassic Jocueim/Statue, I've changed my position.

Not Dr. M, but a good impression nevertheless.

Ha Ha - please don't take this the wrong way, but that answer must have been written on a phone (small keys, etc.) or you've had a night out with JTL before typing that!

 

[TheSpud]

Ha Ha - please don't take this the wrong way, but that answer must have been written on a phone (small keys, etc.) or you've had a night out with JTL before typing that!

And I mean the miss-typing not the opinion.

 

[Dear Wiggo]

Is obvious sockpuppet obvious? Belittling The Clinic whilst participating in it solely, whilst talking up the "skill" of provoking "thought"...


Seems legit.

 

[the sceptic]

Ha Ha - please don't take this the wrong way, but that answer must have been written on a phone (small keys, etc.) or you've had a night out with JTL before typing that!

ball, not man Martin.

 

[Race Radio]

Is obvious sockpuppet obvious? Belittling The Clinic whilst participating in it solely, whilst talking up the "skill" of provoking "thought"...


Seems legit.

Sounds like a Whiteboytrash sockpuppet

 

[thehog]

Ha Ha - please don't take this the wrong way, but that answer must have been written on a phone (small keys, etc.) or you've had a night out with JTL before typing that!

JTL probably tells a good story when drunk? Letters and all that

 

[MarkvW]

Actually it's vlassic Jocueim/Statue, I've changed my position.

Not Dr. M, but a good impression nevertheless.

I'm not so sure! He's discussing my posting history now.

 

[the sceptic]

I'm not so sure! He's discussing my posting history now.

Free vortex. I feel like he might be holding back on this new account to not make it super obvious its him.

 

[Granville57]

Free vortex. I feel like he might be holding back on this new account to not make it super obvious its him.

It's not the good doctor.

 

[MarkvW]

Free vortex. I feel like he might be holding back on this new account to not make it super obvious its him.

It might not be Maserati. Maserati was really for Floyd forgiveness and this guy isn[t quite as forgiving. Still.... I don't know...

 

[Semper Fidelis]

You are in the UK I believe - so you posted this at 10:21am UK time.

This at 10:57 UK time.

Then this at 11:10am UK time.

Then you went to bed.....

If you have any further argument that you don't want public, then don't make your arguments in public.

Various studies of EPO's ability to increase tumor growth is sufficient that the FDA issued a bulletin and developed a whole risk management plan, Doctor training, etc...



Who are these "some?"
Doctors? PhD medical researcher types?
The FDA?
Defenders of Armstrong on the internet?

If you know any of these "some" I suggest you tell them to contact the FDA and tell the FDA 'hey, you've got it all wrong boys.'



"some" also believe the Earth is flat. I don't find the measure "some people" agree / disagree to be a meaningful metric.



Yes, I acknowledged the underlined in my post.





Then why did you waste my time asking for "vetted" studies? Most vetted studies are behind paywalls. Yes, I can access these studies. No, I can not post them (copy write issues).



I would describe this as a "goalpost move."
-First you want "vetted" studies, which I provided.
-you ignore the importance of the FDA's actions on EPO
-But then the goalpost gets moved to 'has Bluenote studied this, what is Bluenote's scientific knowledge.'



I assume if I engage this line of argument, the goalposts will just move again. You'll be picking a nit about the statistical models the studies used, how they were regressed, how much I know about that stuff, etc...

If you're not going to accept the FDA's opinion, you're unlikely to accept anything else. Not worth wasting my time to argue this with you.



If you want to critique Archibold's imprecise use of language and say: 'hey Bro, you should have said 'EPO could be like rain on grass,' then go for it.

Though, one could turn that same criticism back on you.



You were imprecise when you said 'show the links.' You should have said 'show a 100% link,' or 'show a link that no one (not even some people!) would dispute.'



You were imprecise when you said 'some people.' How many people is 'some?' Does it matter if these 'some' are Doctors, or PhD types?

What does 'unremarkable' mean, in the context of a medical study?

We could play this language game all day. But why bother?

Archibald wasn't 100% correct when he described PEDs as gasoline to a spark, but he wasn't 100% incorrect either. Proving a guy wasn't right but he also wasn't wrong, isn't exactly winning the internet.

Agreed, with a 'duh'.

No way is he the vortex.

No way .

 

[the sceptic]

No way .

amazing posts.

only one person could devote that much time and effort into winning an argument on the internet.