airstream said:Well, might be expected after the Verbier that he was flying the TT hill too. I was rather surprised how the 60kg rider could do the powerful, technically not difficult descent as fast as Cancellara. That was unbelievable.
LaFlorecita said:He lost time on the descent and on the last flat part, IIRC.
+1 to Howman for saying it as it is.
"The appeal was based on the fact that the federation got it wrong in exonerating him. simple as that. He had the banned substance in his system, with no excuse and that was why we appealed. I'm hopeful that CAS will make the correct decision."
Pandora said:OK, but how come there is excuse for them:
http://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/news?slug=ap-mexico-doping
They also had banned substance in them and therefore there should not be excuse as well or ...?
Thoughtforfood said:I think he will be cleared, but I hope he isn't. To clear him "for the sake of the sport" is the poorest excuse imaginable. If Contador infused a bag that contained Clen because he didn't wait long enough to draw out the blood after using Clen, then he deserves a ban. Protestations of mystery meat are laughably transparent.
What I also find interesting are the people who froth at the mouth wanting Armstrong exposed, yet defend a rider who by performance indication is as dirty as anyone. I will never forget the "tranquillo" look on Contador's face at the top of the climb in the final TT in 2009. Everyone else that came through that point looked like they were about to die, but not Bertie, he looked fresh as a daisy. I don't know if you guys are aware of this, but many of those guys who looked dead were doped to the eyeballs...but not so for Bertie.Contador is a doping cheat who hadn't tested positive until 2010. They found a banned substance in his system, and he deserves to be punished for it. He won't be because the pressure is on to "save"cycling, and having another winner of the TdF disqualified is bad press, but that will never change the fact that Contador is as dirty as any rider in the peloton...but you guys make sure you only crucify Lance.
I want both punished because there isn't any difference between the two in regards to their preparation. Maybe Contador is a nicer guy, but that has nothing to do with whether you deserve to suffer the consequences of your actions.
Cimber said:Cows can swim![]()
That much is true.Dr. Maserati said:Ya- thats why I included a shark.
No-one gets past the shark.
Pandora said:OK, but how come there is excuse for them:
http://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/news?slug=ap-mexico-doping
They also had banned substance in them and therefore there should not be excuse as well or ...?
Dr. Maserati said:Ya- thats why I included a shark.
No-one gets past the shark.
ramjambunath said:Sorry for quoting an old-ish post, reading through this thread only now.
.....
Dr. Maserati, true and it made me chuckle as well. He has to prove that his meat was contaminated and there's no reason for the judge to assume that the meat he bought was contaminated, unless the shop/friend that he bought the meat from has an extensive history of selling contaminated meat and so far there's no evidence of that.
airstream said:I don't consider 10-20 sec to be losing time regarding Cancellara on the section like that.![]()
hrotha said:That much is true.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nzd0R_OeOc
GJB123 said:No actually he doesn't, as has been discussed ad nauseam by now and which was also confirmed by the good doctor. It's all about likelihoods, that much is celar by now.
Regards
GJ
Sophistic said:He has to lose the title, even if they dont ban him.
What if a gc guy gets during a tv interview at the Tour attacked by a guy with a needle full of EPO?He has the proof that he didnt put the stuff into his body so he wouldnt get a ban but would he be allowed to continue?No.
If Contador is indeed innocent, he can sue some spanish farmers but he cant keep his title.
Sophistic said:He has to lose the title, even if they dont ban him.
What if a gc guy gets during a tv interview at the Tour attacked by a guy with a needle full of EPO?He has the proof that he didnt put the stuff into his body so he wouldnt get a ban but would he be allowed to continue?No.
If Contador is indeed innocent, he can sue some spanish farmers but he cant keep his title.
No, taking away the title means he had an unfair advantage over his competitors, willingly or not.Dutchsmurf said:It will be kind of easy to prove what happened then and of course he would get to continue.
No ban means he was innocent, so he gets to keep his title. Taking away the title means he was guilty. If you do that while the court cleared him, it will only result in more court action. And in the end, with the CAS verdict in hand (if cleared), Contador will win that court battle fast. So if you do try to take away his title while he was cleared, Contador and his lawyers are the only one who get better of it.
hrotha said:No, taking away the title means he had an unfair advantage over his competitors, willingly or not.