[...]
[about ASO and UCI celebrating Armstrong and keeping his story alive]
GL: If he [LA] was a normal rider an not a cancer surviver surrounded by a machinery - he would have long since been out of the game.
Q: What do you mean by machinery?
GL: His people. I remember travelling to the Tour-Presentation in 2003. I really was willing to put aside the differences I had with him, because the Tour celebrated it´s 100th. So I went there, Armstrong was supposed to get get on stage [together] with me. Then he came - 30 minutes late, of course. He talked to his manager, they talked to Leblanc, they turned towards me - and then someone asked me whether I could get onto the stage alone instead of with Armstrong
[...]
Q: Dont´ you have any hope?
GL: Not wiithout cleansing the whole house, starting at the UCI. They have to go, their head has to go [...] everybody was part of the dirty game and no one says: "let´s sweep the house!" Of course cycling survives, but [will it stay] respectable, with pride?
No, it´s only the business that counts.
Q: In may FL said he had no evidence to support his allegtions.
GL: I beleive to know he indeed has evidence [take this with a grain of salt. Hard to translate, "durchaus" may als well be used to "diminish" a statement (but then it would be followed by a "aber" (="but")]. He named those riders rather unwilingly, he told me. Because they are guys of his kind. But to be credible, he has to do this. In US jurisdiction there ist something like "Anscheinsbeweis" [I´m lost here - is there something like "prima facie proof"?], and hey, how much circumstancial evidence do you need for Armstrong? The positives from 99 will now certainly be used, because this is a criminal investigation. But the investigators are not after doping. They´re after: Bank transfers, the flow of money, covering up crime.
Q: Armstrong used to sue everyone who attacked him. Not in this case.
GL: Because Floyd is telling the truth. And they know it, he does, the other culprits, their layers know it. These trials tend to develop a life of their own, and they [the culprits] prefer to pass out on that.
[...]
Q: So Armstrong said on the phone in 2001, he would rustle up 10 folks that would confirm you too were taking EPO? Did he find them?
GL: He tried with all means. I know he wanted to pay someone to say that. I can´t tell you who that was because that person is still working in the peloton. But he was offered 300000 Dollar for claiming I took EPO. He refused. (Armstrongs team spokesman, confronted with this allegation said: "This ist the first time we hear about this thing and it is absolutely not true. It´s a wonderful story")