Uh, no. Horner won from EARLY IN HIS CAREER. The guy turned pro when he was 24/25. Basically his first real year, he wins a stage at the Tour du Pont. The fact that you regard that as a nothing shows how limited your cycling knowledge really is.Parker said:That doesn't make any sense. I've not set up a norm. I've just said Horner, who you said won from an early age unlike Froome, had won sod all at Froome's age.
My opinion on Horner is open. I really have little idea whether he's doping or not. Froome is just an informed hunch.
My point is merely the incredibly poor way some of you use information.
Froome was a nobody with no contract for next year before his miraculous 2011 Vuelta transformation.