- May 3, 2010
- 2,662
- 0
- 0
sittingbison said:Sorry Mrs Murphy
You are barking up the wrong tree using the jingo argument. If you bother to notice, I have spent the past three months hoeing into Rogers and Porte, and recently Kerrison.
I asked a perfectly legit question, that without any form of evidence whatsoever there is no point questioning SOG. I agree everyone should be open to scrutiny, however hopefully that scrutiny will start with some form of concern. In this case you have failed to present anything, so once again I ask the mods to close this thread.
Again, there are more than enough extremely vexing issues to persue without wasting time and energy on vexation. If you have something of genuine interest, fine. Until then, give it a rest.
Why is there no point in questioning a rider?
You don't have to have an accusation to start a thread. If you had read the first post I picked up on a quote from The Hog and asked if it could be elaborated on. I'm interested in what the story is on them and what people know. It is about exchanging information.
Nick C. said:That would qualify as raising a question and providing some evidence as to why. Just pulling a name out of a hat and when asked for more info coming up with the fanboy, nationality, freedom of the press lines is beyond weak.
almost as weak a shrill defensive response to a question about one of your favoured riders. In your case the accusation of nationalism and fanboyism rings pretty much true as you only ever seem to pop out of the woodwork when an Australian is called into question.