- Oct 30, 2011
- 2,639
- 0
- 0
Galic Ho said:Hatred? I'm a straight shooter genius. If I hated Austin Powers wannabe...I'd say so. He's hilarious. The guy to dislike. It was Schleck last year...will be him this year. Someone else next year. Honestly, the fact he's a carbon cut out of Armstrong...that doesn't bother you? Anyone in England? Of all the people you can mirror, you pick him. That is very revealing.
I'm English. I think that Wiggins is probably going to win the Tour, but I don't want him to because I think he's boring and annoying. I just think you are seeing what you want to see where you want to see it. Out of the other riders on this poll, I would prefer a win from any one of them to a Wiggins win.
My comment was not to spite Wiggins, but to highlight a mistake I believe he is making. He should take the Dauphine lightly but seriously. Not what he has said and not what his domestiques have said. He's going full ball balistic to win this. To prove what? He's a contender? That's stupid. But of course, once again I have to join all the dots for people. That's why my posts are long. Inferring knowledge and ideas...people here refuse to do it. They go off on a tangent. Answer this if you are serious, why has Contador not done this? Then explain the paralled between Evans trying to win the Dauphine and falling short at the Tour every time he tried...and stating Wiggins is just more talented isn't sufficient, that's subjective opinion. Not proven in road results. Answer that and you'll understand why I couldn't be bothered once again answering more blind Wiggins fanboys questions.
I think one has to see a lot of what Sky say as PR for non-cycling people who are just going to read about it in the papers. I think Wiggins will probably give it a go - that is one of the few things I actually like about him, that he doesn't follow the Armstrong template in that regard.
Oh and the point about Wiggins really being behind...if you lost a one week stage race over 2-3 seconds and yet won a stage, like Cadel did today and your rival won GC because he cruised, would you not like to see the rules changed? It's one of the few failings of cycling and I thoroughly dislike it. Not Wiggins fault he is the beneficiary as he was second after the prologue, but the point remains. I think it encourages wheel sucking...not that Brad was doing that, yesterday showed he was flogging himself, but it encourages riders to become the next Bottle. I say bring back time bonuses. High risk, high reward. If the peloton takes 10-15 seconds to pass the line, you should not finish 15-20 behind a winner and get +4 on official time. It's wrong. To those who don't agree...do you still count using your fingers and toes? For every 5-10 riders in the peloton, I say add +1 second. Irrespective. Evans ALWAYS tries to be in the first 20 over the line every stage of every race he competes in seriously. Harder to stay there. Those who want to take it easier a bit further back there should be slapped with a cost in time. You'd be amazed how it would change racing for the better.
If they lost in that situation, I don't think they'd be daft enough to get mad at rules that everyone knew perfectly well when they signed up. It's not exactly Wiggins' fault that Cadel want to get into the top 20 all the time. I think the cyclists themselves would realise that if those were the rules, the race would have changed, so the comparison is meaningless.
Drafting is what makes cycling interesting. Cycling without drafting is just like tri without even the swimming or cycling to mix things up. I don't think it would make cycling any more interesting, it would just lead to ridiculous fighting for position and too many crashes.
Oh yeah, the Clinic...you've seen the threads? Nah, you weren't a forum member when they started. If you did you'd realise I made the first thread about Wiggins in the Clinic. One of the few I've made. Back in 2009.
You're actually the first person I've seen on CN up themselves enough to try and use being around here for a long time as an argument. If you made the thread yourself, why exactly did you say "I'd love to see a thread on it"? I've posted about Wiggins' rise only today, and am critical of it, for what it's worth.
Oh, and I'm pretty sure you've got Hitch's location wrong.
