• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Who will win Liège-Bastogne-Liège?

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Who will win this classic?

  • Samuel Sanchez/other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
The Hitch said:
Question 2 who has been by far the better rider this season? I would say its Sanchez.

Though of course im not being objective. :rolleyes:

so could.someone else please tell me who has been the better rider this season as i.am not objective enough to make a rational decision on that.

Samu has been better than Mollema this year, and it's not even close.
But Samu better Nibbles, I'd say it's debatable.

Though I agree with you on Samu having a better resume for this kind of races.
 
Kwibus said:
I don't really agree. Sanchez is imo made for these kind of races.
It's a shame he doesn't race L-B-L that often.
Mollema and Nibali will probably be up there, allthough Nibali hasn't really shown his face yet, but L-B-L suits him most of the 3 Ardennes races.

Ofcourse The Hitch jumps on everyone that doesn't rate Sanchez very high as well :D

Just like many others do when their favourite rider doesn't get the recognition they think he/she should get.

What is it with this forum and this obsession with telling everyone their opinion is biased?.
Can't it just be that I suggested Sanchez should be higher because he has been one of.the top two or three riders this year and probably the top one to start.

Is that too simple? would that not make any sence ?
ps im picking contador to win the vuelta. might want to chalk that one up to me being a contador fan too:rolleyes:
 
SafeBet said:
Samu has been better than Mollema this year, and it's not even close.
But Samu better Nibbles, I'd say it's debatable.

Though I agree with you on Samu having a better resume for this kind of races.

Oops. meant to write better rather than by far. as the i "would" that comes after should suggest.
 
Kwibus said:
Rodriguez looks good, but the finish line isn't ideal for him.

Plenty of riders will beat him in a sprint and I don't see him solo to the finish.

I agree with this.

I think the winner will be from this group of riders:

Cunego
Gilbert
Frandy
Voeckler
Van den Broeck
Kreuziger
Kiserlovski
Hesjedal

And for the hell of it, I am going to say that van den Broeck will win from Voeckler and Cunego.

That'd be an interesting podium.

It actually seems like a race full of possibles this year. And I think it will be the best classic of the season.
 
barmaher said:
I agree with this.

I think the winner will be from this group of riders:

Cunego
Gilbert
Frandy
Voeckler
Van den Broeck
Kreuziger
Kiserlovski
Hesjedal

And for the hell of it, I am going to say that van den Broeck will win from Voeckler and Cunego.

That'd be an interesting podium.

It actually seems like a race full of possibles this year. And I think it will be the best classic of the season.
Van den Broeck will win a sprint against Voeckler and Cunego :confused:
 
May 27, 2010
5,376
0
0
Zam_Olyas said:
You have been saying that almost every race... but, yeah.... even a broke a$$ clock is right once in awhile...so you could turn out to be right.

No... But yeah at first I didn't expect the sickness to hinder him for so long. But this time he really looks much better, he has got a great chance to win.
Will everything about Gilbert's early failures be forgotten if he manages to win LBL?:eek:
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Zam_Olyas said:
You have been saying that almost every race... but, yeah.... even a broke a$$ clock is right once in awhile...so you could turn out to be right.

2. Damiano Cunego

:D
 
May 31, 2011
231
0
0
CasperVg said:
Won't be Van den Broeck, he'll just find another way to crash out of the race. He fell today during recon ride as well. :rolleyes:

And he certainly won't outsprint cunego and voeckler, unless he attended Vino's masterclass on.. say, 'business'.
 
Mar 2, 2012
55
0
0
three days ago I thought Cunego was looking good but there is no way he will recover from today's efforts at Trentino, not to mention the travel back to LBL.

I am surprised and disappointed he didnt withdrawal yesterday, weird. Perhaps this is about WT points.

Someone from Astana will win. Is Vino starting? :)
 
Cu-ne-go! Cu-ne-go!

I've got him all the way. It would be crazy if Voeckler could win, and it's even crazier that, even after his last 2 years, I kind of believe he could do it. It just seems so weird to be talking about Voeckler as a winner of LBL.

Samu and Gilbert will certainly be dangerous if they can hang, and I think Samu would have a better chance of sticking with someone like Cunego than Gilbert in current form. Gilbert has shown some improvement in explosiveness, but his burst was too short in Amstel and Fleche. This is Liege we're talking about.

Anyway,

1. Cunego
2-10 who knows, but some of F.Schleck, Kreuziger, Nibali, Samu, Vanendert, Gilbert, Voeckler, Rodriguez.
 
The Hitch said:
Wtf Sanchez with other. You mad.

Personally i would have Samu 3rd or 4th behind Gilbert - huge favourite, and maybe Vandendert or Cunego.
You're right, it should have been Vino/Other :D

The Hitch said:
Edit I see you put Nibali, Voeckler and Mollema ahead of Sanchez.
GT winner Nibali makes sense but not Mollema or Voeckler. Plus you have to wonder how Sanchez is doing since he just decided to do the race.
 
Jul 6, 2011
824
0
0
Fränk Schleck.

If Andy and Horner are in shape I believe they could do great damage on the climbs near the end and set up Fränk for a good chance to win.
 
cineteq said:
You're right, it should have been Vino/Other :D

GT winner Nibali makes sense but not Mollema or Voeckler. Plus you have to wonder how Sanchez is doing since he just decided to do the race.

Yeah Nibali won a gt, but hes not a better gt rider than Sanchez.

Unless you want to believe that say Arroyo is a better gt rider than Gesink because he has podiumed a gt.

Which is totaly irrelevant anyway since this is not a gt but a hilly classic and Samuel Sanchez is clearly the better classics rider.
 
The Hitch said:
Yeah Nibali won a gt, but hes not a better gt rider than Sanchez. Which is totaly irrelevant anyway since this is not a gt but a hilly classic and Samuel Sanchez is clearly the better classics rider.
Very debatable, they have similar qualities, but I give Le Squalo the edge since he's more cerebral and more consistant.

Btw, if Nibali finishes ahead of Sanchez on Sunday will the score be settled?
 
cineteq said:
Very debatable, they have similar qualities, but I give Le Squalo the edge since he's more cerebral and more consistant.

Btw, if Nibali finishes ahead of Sanchez on Sunday will the score be settled?

Not unless he wins. If he comes 6th and Sanchez 20th or DNF or whatever that doesnt mean Nibali had a better chance at winning.

Unless you are talking about their hilly classics ability. If Nibali wins by blowing everyone away then yes he probably will have a right to claim that he is a better hilly classics rider than Sanchez. But if he merely podiums, then thats not going to close the gap.
 

TRENDING THREADS