- Dec 30, 2011
- 3,547
- 0
- 0
SetonHallPirate said:Because prior to Eneco, he hasn't done a single pedal revolution in anger all year.
And... so
SetonHallPirate said:Because prior to Eneco, he hasn't done a single pedal revolution in anger all year.
The Hitch said:It will be Wiggins.
Contador wont feature. He has won it twice already and is likely to win it again some day, they wont give it to him for a Vuelta.
Froome19 said:You can say that about any rider, why specifically Contador?![]()
SafeBet said:Three times if I'm not mistaken.
SafeBet said:Seriously though, he's never won a monument in his career.
Suggesting he could win both the Worlds and the Lombardia in one month, after coming back from months without racing just doesn't make sense.
SafeBet said:Seriously though, he's never won a monument in his career.
Suggesting he could win both the Worlds and the Lombardia in one month, after coming back from months without racing just doesn't make sense.
LaFlorecita said:No one is saying he will, people are saying he could.
Froome19 said:Exactly there is a possibility but it is near to as remote as the possibility any other rider will achieve such a feat.
LaFlorecita said:I disagree. There are very few riders that could achieve it.
Devilen said:i'm not putting money on Boonen ... he's one of the older riders and have the last few years been less and less in the right spot at the right time, tailing after Cav and lately Sagan ...
leaning towards Wiggins although i'm not sure i argee that he deserves it (sky as a team is looking to be the winner of the tour, wiggins only just happen to be their top man, could just as well be froome)
Peccio89 said:Boonen because he won Paris-Roubaix in style, while Wiggo never attacked in the Tour
Finn84 said:Also to consider that Boonen could have likely won even if that group had arrived together in velodrome.
That day I had chance to see only last 40 km or so...decisive attack had already happened.
El Pistolero said:Wiggins on the other hand was clearly weaker than Froome.
Devilen said:i'm not putting money on Boonen ... he's one of the older riders and have the last few years been less and less in the right spot at the right time, tailing after Cav and lately Sagan ...
leaning towards Wiggins although i'm not sure i argee that he deserves it (sky as a team is looking to be the winner of the tour, wiggins only just happen to be their top man, could just as well be froome)
Devilen said:i'm not putting money on Boonen ... he's one of the older riders and have the last few years been less and less in the right spot at the right time, tailing after Cav and lately Sagan ...
leaning towards Wiggins although i'm not sure i argee that he deserves it (sky as a team is looking to be the winner of the tour, wiggins only just happen to be their top man, could just as well be froome)