- May 15, 2011
- 45,171
- 617
- 24,680
ContaMuse said:Let's hope he will applyI am following these discussions for about a half year and now finally i made an account
![]()
Are you a fan?
ContaMuse said:Let's hope he will applyI am following these discussions for about a half year and now finally i made an account
![]()
sniper said:Dear ContaMuse,
Hi there,
I don't think Dopador will appeal.
The discourse from the Clentador-camp has changed from "great injustice" to "for whom will he ride when he returns?". That's one sign.
Also, I don't think Clenbutador will appeal because with an appeal he has no time to gain (even if he wins the appeal), only time to loose.
Ok, money and prestige to gain, but that is only if he wins the appeal, which is uncertain enough.
In any case, even if Dirty wins the appeal, he won't win back the months he's loosing now. And, mind you, an appeal would create quite a stirr within the peloton. Not many will approve and it won't win him any friends in the peloton, which I think is something Aldirty will seriously take into consideration.
But I could be wrong of course.
sniper said:Dear ContaMuse,
Hi there,
I don't think Dopador will appeal.
The discourse from the Clentador-camp has changed from "great injustice" to "for whom will he ride when he returns?". That's one sign.
Also, I don't think Clenbutador will appeal because with an appeal he has no time to gain (even if he wins the appeal), only time to loose.
Ok, money and prestige to gain, but that is only if he wins the appeal, which is uncertain enough.
In any case, even if Dirty wins the appeal, he won't win back the months he's loosing now. And, mind you, an appeal would create quite a stirr within the peloton. Not many will approve and it won't win him any friends in the peloton, which I think is something Aldirty will seriously take into consideration.
But I could be wrong of course.
ContaMuse said:Yes, Alberto is my favourite rider. Before him it was Ullrich. So you understand the last weeks were very hard![]()
roundabout said:What did he say?
Screaming that it's bs isn't really an argument.
sniper said:Dear ContaMuse,
Hi there,
I don't think Dopador will appeal.
The discourse from the Clentador-camp has changed from "great injustice" to "for whom will he ride when he returns?". That's one sign..
LaFlorecita said:Lol the CAS ruling is bullsh it. Not the man who said it is bullsh it...
roundabout said:I mean why is it bull****? Why do that journo and that professor think so?
sniper said:Blanpain might well have a point, he seems unbiassed.
So Aldoper might have a case.
But I still think that, in Aldirto's mind, the argument that he will make a lot of enemies within the peloton if he appeals will weigh very strong and might keep him from appealing.
LaFlorecita said:Ah, another two. It's fascinating to see everything you pull out of your hat of hatred. It seems like you try to make every combination possible. Hey, what about Doperto?
sniper said:what if you'd finally start dealing with content instead of with form?
start replying to posts, instead of to posters
Oh wait, I know what you're thinking right now:![]()
not the brightest bulb are you?
LaFlorecita said:http://www.nieuwsblad.be/article/detail.aspx?articleid=DMF20120207_175
http://www.sporza.be/cm/sporza/wielrennen/1.1214124
In terms of human rights it doesn't make sense at all, the fact that basically was said that it's most likely he didn't deliberately dope, but that he still got a suspension.
Vandeweghe says it as "brandhout maken van deze gang van zaken". I don't immediately know a correct translation of that, so I hope you're Dutch (or Flemish) and understand.
LaFlorecita said:Great.There can never be enough fans. Also, I totally understand you had a hard time. I know someone that also is/was a fan of both, it's really hard for her too.
Also, don't argue with sniper. It's pointless.
I do agree with you, however. And what Vandeweghe said is just spot on. It's total bulls.hit.
LaFlorecita said:Still 2 days left.![]()
The Hitch said:So now we can safely say hes not appealing?
LaFlorecita said:http://www.nieuwsblad.be/article/detail.aspx?articleid=DMF20120207_175
http://www.sporza.be/cm/sporza/wielrennen/1.1214124
In terms of human rights it doesn't make sense at all, the fact that basically was said that it's most likely he didn't deliberately dope, but that he still got a suspension.
Vandeweghe says it as "brandhout maken van deze gang van zaken". I don't immediately know a correct translation of that, so I hope you're Dutch (or Flemish) and understand.
Caruut said:Surely they said "he probably didn't dope" because to suggest that he did could be potentially libellous and was, moreover, not what they were charged with investigating. An allegation that he had doped might be easier to prove to be "without sufficient grounds" and therefore void the entire ruling based on a claim that didn't need to be made. By saying "probably didn't dope" they protect themselves from getting lawyered.
Not sure why you think Alberto Contador Velasco is the victim of a breach of his human rights - he knew when he raced and when he was tested that strict liability applied to clen. Having failed to find a reasonable explanation, he got banned. If he'd just held his hands up and said "Sorry, no idea how that got there, I'll take the ban", he could be back on his bike in a few months, and a fair bit richer. But he decided the rules didn't apply to him, tried to appeal and failed.
