the big ring
BANNED
- Jul 28, 2009
- 2,135
- 0
- 0
acoggan said:the big ring said:your word for option 1 could be interpreted as nondoped or doped.
Correct, and you should have interpreted it that way.
Righto. So when your words can be "interpreted", it's the interpreters fault if they get it wrong, but when you "interpret" what I wrote wrongly, after trimming words from what I said, it's my fault.
acoggan said:"The precise communication of precise ideas requires the precise use of precise terminology." - A. Coggan, ca. 1980.
Or IOW: if your "stream of conciousness" writing style leads to miscommunication, you have no one to blame but yourself...
Heads you win, tails I lose.
Very.... convenient.
acoggan said:More sophistry...
acoggan said:It means that I agree with Krebs Cycle, i.e., you are clearly only interested in a ****ing contest, and are willing to twist words and misstate people's positions in an attempt to "win" the same. It most definitely does NOT mean "I'm sorry".
That precise enough for you?
Given I quoted you verbatim, unlike the post of mine you trimmed, I'd really like to see where I twisted anything. Perhaps you can show that.
You claimed I "interpreted' it wrong, implying it could be interpreted. Therefore the language was imprecise. "You have noone to blame but yourself" - A, Coggan, ca 2012.
If you think that's sophistry you need a new dictionary.