sniper said:
excellent post.
only that there is some circularity in the argument that Dirty is such an attacking rider. We have no idea how much of his attacking strength is down to the quality of his program. It's plausible to assume that there are at least a couple of guys out there craving to attack Contador-style, but who simply aren't able to do so because their steak is only medium rare, whereas Dirty eats his well-cooked.
Granted, Dirty is on average more attacking than, say, Armstrong was, but there are other reasons for that: the GTs AC has won all developed differently than the ones LA has won. Dirty never had the team around him that Lance had, so Dirty was always compelled to be more attacking than Lance was.
I very much doubt that, if AC had a team like USPS or Sky around him, he would be as attacking as he is now.
I am reading today there is a new test for HGH.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/howman-welcomes-hgh-test-talks-hamilton-and-uci
Maybe if to go with that there was a full body hemoglobin test then we'd really see how much of Contador's on road form is down to doping. I still think a great deal of it is instinctive. I think the potency and duration of his attacks are the only thing affected by doping. He'd still attack clean, it just wouldn't be as powerful. It may still be effective, but that is all relative to every other rider in the peloton and their cleanliness or doping at a set time.
Contador rode two GT's with Armstrong around. 2007 Tour, Lance was in the car during his final chrono. Was the last year Disco was a sponsor. He had a lot of support that year from Popo. Leipheimer was on the team as well. Most attacking Tour I have ever seen. If Armstrong had of raced, the team would have raced differently. Then in 2009. The plan was to pull Lance around France. Kloden, who had superior form gave up his ambitions to help Lance. Had Horner raced and Levi not fallen off, I think Armstrong would have been beaten there as well. Note even when the team plan was in play, one lone rider stood up to Lance and Bruyneel.
Contador's attacks on Verbier and Arcalis were the only interesting thing in the race apart from the final ITT. We have seen how LA races a GT whilst Contador is in the peloton. Your description of Armstrong is accurate, but Contador still attacked the man. Had he not, he'd have lost the Tour. Lance was 0.2 seconds off yellow after the TTT. The coup de etat almost succeeded. Had Lance not sat up early, he'd have been in yellow instead of Cancellara and Contador would not have been entitled to attack.
As for Sky. I disagree. They wouldn't need the train. He'd just ride like he does now, like in the Vuelta and before. The reason Wiggins and Armstrong's GT goals manifest in trains and boring racing is because they cannot physically win any other way. I have thought for a long time now, that if Contador raced for Sky, they'd be a lot more liked among fans, because the train would go. Heck, with Contador on the team, I'd wager there would be room for Cavendish and that is because of how Alberto rides versus Wiggins and Froome.
Same goes with Rodriguez, Samu, Valverde and Evans. They are all at the end of the day, doping removed, better riders than Armstrong or Wiggins. They can get the job done alone. And they do it all year. Take away the support, Wiggins armor is gone. That's why these guys are more liked by hardcore fans. They get their hands and shoes dirty, by doing it themselves. No train is needed.