- Jun 14, 2010
- 34,930
- 60
- 22,580
Jack (6 ch) said:Wot no SBW???
Nah, but this is just pure climbing. Variable such as transformation, lateness of transformation, season peak as a whole, tting, etc are all ignored.
Jack (6 ch) said:Wot no SBW???
The Hitch said:In the clinic, does it really matter who "looks good" on the bike, or off it?
Justinr said:Regardless of which side of the Froome debate people are on you have to admit he looks really ungainly on the bike, like its several sizes too small for him.
BYOP88 said:Nice list. I think "El Chava" was a damn fine doped climber too.
ferryman said:You do know that we all agree with you. We all hate dopers.
happychappy said:This is me when I saw:
1. Tony Martin (OPQS) 38:33
2. Contador (Tinkoff-Saxo) 38:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIaFtAKnqBU
Beech Mtn said:On the Annecy TT thing - there was also the issue with Contador apparently getting a lot of help from the motos, at least Cancellara was ****ed about it after he lost by such a tiny margin. Which is not to say AC wasn't juiced as well.
Absolutely he was, may he RIP.
I hope that was meant to be sarcastic, because no, we don't all hate dopers.
gooner said:Well don't come in and pontificate on doping like you try to do in the various Sky threads.
You can't be credible then.
Beech Mtn said:Hi Forum Police!
I'll post wherever I want, thanks.![]()
Nathan12 said:I didn't see today as that incredible.
If you don't reply, I don't have to say two...Beech Mtn said:Us two? Nice modding.
happychappy said:This is me when I saw:
1. Tony Martin (OPQS) 38:33
2. Contador (Tinkoff-Saxo) 38:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIaFtAKnqBU
berzin said:doped to the eyeballs with absolutely no proof.
One would think someone in the bruyneel iteration of astana would have stepped up by now, since they've pretty much have all been disgraced and have nothing further to lose at this point, and said something about contador.
But all you guys have to go on is a microscopic level of clenbuterol and a childish, undying hatred of the "pistolero" salute. And as we all know, such levels of clen is a clear sign of all manner of organized doping skullduggery and more transfusions than in a wwii battlefield hospital.
It makes me wonder what this particular lab would have found if they had tested all the samples collected at the tour.
Contador is doing us the favor by actually providing some good racing. If some of you can't enjoy it, what pleasure exactly so you get by relentlessly repeating the same unproven charges? Some of you are more obsessed with this than tv televangelists.
LaFlorecita said:It doesn't hurt at all, Contador is awesome
![]()
![]()
Berzin said:Doped to the eyeballs with absolutely no proof.
One would think someone in the Bruyneel iteration of Astana would have stepped up by now, since they've pretty much have all been disgraced and have nothing further to lose at this point, and said something about Contador.
But all you guys have to go on is a microscopic level of clenbuterol and a childish, undying hatred of the "Pistolero" salute. And as we all know, such levels of clen is a clear sign of all manner of organized doping skullduggery and more transfusions than in a WWII battlefield hospital.
It makes me wonder what this particular lab would have found if they had tested all the samples collected at the Tour.
Contador is doing us a favor by actually providing some good racing. If some of you can't enjoy it, what pleasure is there in relentlessly repeating the same unproven charges? Some of you are more obsessed with this than those loony TV televangelists.
Berzin said:Doped to the eyeballs with absolutely no proof.
One would think someone in the Bruyneel iteration of Astana would have stepped up by now, since they've pretty much have all been disgraced and have nothing further to lose at this point, and said something about Contador.
But all you guys have to go on is a microscopic level of clenbuterol and a childish, undying hatred of the "Pistolero" salute. And as we all know, such levels of clen is a clear sign of all manner of organized doping skullduggery and more transfusions than in a WWII battlefield hospital.
It makes me wonder what this particular lab would have found if they had tested all the samples collected at the Tour.
Contador is doing us a favor by actually providing some good racing. If some of you can't enjoy it, what pleasure is there in relentlessly repeating the same unproven charges? Some of you are more obsessed with this than those loony TV televangelists.
Berzin said:Doped to the eyeballs with absolutely no proof.
One would think someone in the Bruyneel iteration of Astana would have stepped up by now, since they've pretty much have all been disgraced and have nothing further to lose at this point, and said something about Contador.
But all you guys have to go on is a microscopic level of clenbuterol and a childish, undying hatred of the "Pistolero" salute. And as we all know, such levels of clen is a clear sign of all manner of organized doping skullduggery and more transfusions than in a WWII battlefield hospital.
It makes me wonder what this particular lab would have found if they had tested all the samples collected at the Tour.
Contador is doing us a favor by actually providing some good racing. If some of you can't enjoy it, what pleasure is there in relentlessly repeating the same unproven charges? Some of you are more obsessed with this than those loony TV televangelists.
hrotha said:Really, all we have is the "microscopic" amounts of clen (that shouldn't have been there in the first place) and the gunman salute? So Saiz, Puerto, Discovery, Bruyneel, his sprints with Rasmussen, the plasticizers, Pepe Martí, his blatant lies, all of that never happened.
K.
