- May 24, 2010
- 3,444
- 0
- 0
Good post.pmcg76 said:Seriously, you are comparing what happened yesterday to what Landis pulled in 06!!!
Lets see, Landis attacked solo from 100k out with 5 climbs in front of him inclduing the HC Col de Joux Plane plus two 1st cat climbs. He stayed away on his own catching and quickly spitting out the break and won the stage by over 5 minutes having conceded 9 the previous day.
Contador attacked 50km out over a 2nd cat climb, bridged up to a sizeable group whereupon his Saxo team-mated pulled it along until the final sprint with 20k to go when he attacked again to drag Tiralongo with him who promptly did the majority of the work before dropping with about 15k to go and Contador barely held of Valverde at the finish line whom he once had a 2 minute lead over. Yes just like Lanids in 06
I dont mind people claiming yesterdays performance was somehow proof of doping but the gross exaggeration's are just stupid really.
nowhereman said:Sorry but, the silence from the testing Labs is deafening.![]()
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Contador didn't gain any more time on Rodriguez once he hit the 2 minutes 30 margin. Valverde on the other hand gained - on his own - more than 1 minute on Contador. Much more suspicious in my book.
roundabout said:I didn't say blood doping, did I?
So **** off, mr armachair hematologist.
Apply the same to some of the Contador fans in this forum. Why is sartoris for example not banned?Parrulo said:roundabout either you stop insulting every1 that disagrees with you or you will face a ban.
roundabout said:So, a temporary "boost" coinciding with the rest day and a mediocre finish.
killswitch said:Apply the same to some of the Contador fans in this forum. Why is sartoris for example not banned?
sartoris said:This or: "He's so strong that he had to dissemble a little bit today".
Either way, haters, Contador has won the Vuelta again, as many of us foresaw and wished.
It's up to you to smoulder in your own bile or join his admirers and enjoy his epic performances..... Good luck!![]()
killswitch said:Apply the same to some of the Contador fans in this forum. Why is sartoris for example not banned?
sniper said:i doubt any sort of stats will be able to disprove what most observers take for granted, namely that spain's generacion de oro is based on juice.
of course other countries juice and spain has merely cauight up, I realize that. but spain's athletic uprising in the 90s and 2000s was one of the most farcical illustrations of institutionalized doping of contemporary sports.
jpljpl said:What does the average stage distance have to do with advantages of doping?
Marion Jones hardly ever went beyond 400m each day, yet found doping quite useful.
Anyway, it's sad to see ex-dopers coming first and second.
LaFlorecita said:Vamos Alberto and Piti!!![]()
Shorter stages = less hard = less doping
(or something like that)
Exactly. The 1988 Olympic Men's 100m is proof of that.LaFlorecita said:Shorter stages = less hard = less doping
jpljpl said:What does the average stage distance have to do with advantages of doping?
Marion Jones hardly ever went beyond 400m each day, yet found doping quite useful.
Anyway, it's sad to see ex-dopers coming first and second.
Don't be late Pedro said:Exactly. The 1988 Olympic Men's 100m is proof of that.