Will Contador Be Juiced Up Again Upon His Return

[Froome19]

Mirburo why are you obsessed with Sky and Froome? I will stop suggesting that Contador should retire if it hurt your heart, i didn't know that you have a tender heart and needs a tender loving care.

When you are 12 you need an idol..

 

[Moose McKnuckles]

When you are 12 you need an idol..

...says the poster with the "Froome19" handle.

 

[LaFlorecita]

Blame the journalists.

Ok, Froome and co got a little carried away with their statements recently, but it's not that different to Contador making sad puppy eyes and proclaiming to be clean whenever he is asked that question.

there is a difference between proclaiming to be clean and saying your wins are a victory for clean cycling, everyone else are cheats bla bla

 

[LaFlorecita]

...says the poster with the "Froome19" handle.

+ says one of the youngest forum members

 

[Miburo]

When you are 12 you need an idol..

lolol from anyone else this might have been painful

but not with that account name

Did i make you mad too one day? I forgot

It's sad that you've to use these cheap shots, you know you lost when you go ad hominem. Btw yes i did it with zam but that wasn't even a debate, just zam trolling

 

[simo1733]

Nothing easily explains Froome's ruse to the top, including being on a doping program.

 

[LaFlorecita]

Trying to get attention again. Go whine about some polls or have a chat with laflo about why contador should retire.

At least you got your attention

I am trying to get attention? ok i will do what you say. Are you happy now? The thing is i fcuking cant stand your little ridiculous poll and your obsession with sky and froome.

okay calm down both of you.

I don't know which side to choose okay I wonder what comes first friends or family

 

[LaFlorecita]

http://www.elimparcial.es/deportes/contador-me-considero-un-ejemplo-de-limpieza-77921.html

Don't fool yourselves. Contador is one of the worst hypocrites in the peloton.

maybe he is clean

 

[Zam_Olyas]

lolol from anyone else this might have been painful

but not with that account name

Did i make you mad too one day? I forgot

It's sad that you've to use these cheap shots, you know you lost when you go ad hominem. Btw yes i did it with zam but that wasn't even a debate, just zam trolling

Are you me or my shrink first, you say i need attention and post to get attention and now it was just trolling. but cool, i only post to get attention.

 

[airstream]

Airstream with an amazing two-pronged defense of sky: (1) nothing wrong with one team being dominant, US postal was dominant too! (2) also, Sky really isn't revolutionary anyway.

i'm convinced

My sentence is very democratic. It doesn't necessarily means doping. If you reject my cue, then probably any winner always has a better doping. So what's the use of following the sport then?

 

[hiero2]

. . .
This is not that Spinach guy.. Popeeye or something..

Popeye! "What, me worry?" "Enough is enough and too much is too much!"

Sorry couldn't take the green
. . .

Got something against spinach? Or St Paddy's day? Green beer is good food.

okay calm down both of you.
. . .

Thank you, LaFlo. Calming would be a good thing - we are getting complaints about the OT noise in here. But it looks like a good party to me. Still - there is some OT stuff. But, see ya later. Y'all have fun!

 

[burning]

I knew that Froome will win a dozen GT's when he climbed San Luca like a beast
Only blind people can't see the exceptional talent

 

[IndianCyclist]

maybe he is clean

Of course he is clean. He brushes his teeth in the morning. he takes a bath everyday and washes his hands before eating. Very very clean. Spotless:

 

[LaFlorecita]

Of course he is clean. He brushes his teeth in the morning. he takes a bath everyday and washes his hands before eating. Very very clean. Spotless:

lolz

 

[Hugh Januss]

I can't believe that there is still anything to debate here. Of course he will still be doping, no reason to even show up otherwise, the whole "new clean generation" crap is nothing but an advertising campaign. There is no less doping now, just a different kind.
So, come on 25% really think he will try to race the Tour clean? Is the Pope Catholic? Does a Brown Bear poop in the woods? Will Contador be doping?

 

[airstream]

Why not?

Because not extremely talented guy will never be able to own all like puppies as Froome does. And it is hypocrisy to think differently. It comes then that one justifies one rider for using doping and condemn others for the same thing.
It's double standarts: I dislike a rider -> he's a lucky donk and super responder. I like a rider -> he's a talent so he used it since young years so no problem

All thе thread is about this discrepancy

 

[Netserk]

Because not extremely talented guy will never be able to own all like puppies as Froome does. And it is hypocrisy to think differently. It comes then that one justifies one rider for using doping and condemn others for the same thing.
It's double standarts: I dislike a rider -> he's a lucky donk and super responder. I like a rider -> he's a talent so he used it since young years so no problem

All thе thread is about this discrepancy

So it also can't be questioned that Riis was an exceptional talent?

 

[airstream]

So it also can't be questioned that Riis was an exceptional talent?

tbh i'm not familiar to riis closely. iirc he won the tour in the year of relative anarchy

 

[Netserk]

tbh i'm not familiar to riis closely. iirc he won the tour in the year of relative anarchy

That Tour he pwned the others harder than Froome have done so far...
So it is hypocrisy to think that Riis wasn't an exceptional talent??

 

[SeriousSam]

Nothing easily explains Froome's ruse to the top, including being on a doping program.

lol

I agree, actually. It's just puzzling.

 

[airstream]

That Tour he pwned the others harder than Froome have done so far...
So it is hypocrisy to think that Riis wasn't an exceptional talent??

No, hypocrisy is to rank riders by legitimacy of using doping

 

[Netserk]

No, hypocrisy is to rank riders by legitimacy of using doping

??

That's not what you said:

Because not extremely talented guy will never be able to own all like puppies as Froome does. And it is hypocrisy to think differently. It comes then that one justifies one rider for using doping and condemn others for the same thing.
It's double standarts: I dislike a rider -> he's a lucky donk and super responder. I like a rider -> he's a talent so he used it since young years so no problem

All thе thread is about this discrepancy

 

[airstream]

??

That's not what you said:

I don't warrant any for concrete case because all people are different. Naturally Riis is very talented too. There are no untalented people on top - only very talented and very very talented. Exactly who and to what extent is bottomless and valueless debate.

 

[Netserk]

I don't warrant any for concrete case because all people are different. Naturally Riis is very talented too. There are no untalented people on top - only very talented and very very talented. Exactly who and to what extent is bottomless and valueless debate.

Do we agree that one would have to be amongst the 5% biggest talents for one to be regarded as an exceptional talent?

 

[Semper Fidelis]

Know your cuts of meat.