World Championships Innsbruck 2018

Page 75 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re:

Andy262 said:
I've thrown a few bets at the men's race already but I really fancy this could be a course for Romain Bardet.

The problem for Bardet is that he basically has to win alone.

I prefer those riders with enough of a sprint to win from a small group. On the basis that Alaphilippe and Valverde will be the most heavily marked, I’ll say Poels and Moscon.
 
I think the climbs are definitely selective enough. There might be a chance that nobody wants to move early and everything comes down to the final ramp (something I don't think will happen but apparently lots of experts do). In that case everything could theoretically come back together on the descent and the race could be decided in a sprint out of a small group, but then again I think even the likelihood of such a scenario is very small.

Cassani thinks that 10 seconds on top of the last climb is enough to win.
 
Re:

Rollthedice said:
I think the climbs are definitely selective enough. There might be a chance that nobody wants to move early and everything comes down to the final ramp (something I don't think will happen but apparently lots of experts do). In that case everything could theoretically come back together on the descent and the race could be decided in a sprint out of a small group, but then again I think even the likelihood of such a scenario is very small.

Cassani thinks that 10 seconds on top of the last climb is enough to win.

Mind you, last year he said anyone who had any gap at all at the top of the climb would win and there was zero chance of a sprint

Cassani is the guy who lost a 2 man sprint, for what would've been the biggest win of his career, to the worst sprinter in history by panicking and leading out with 700m to go. His stories are interesting but he's not exactly the sharpest tool :)
 
Just can't see how Moscon can win this or why he's the Italian leader. If it's a group of 25-30 coming to Hottinger, he'll be outclimbed easily. If it's a smaller group of breakaway puncheurs, maybe a podium, but there's bound to be better climbers. The only way I could see him do it is a longish solo break, but he's been too mediocre this year to suggest that is likely to be successful. Might pit a bit of money on Pozzovivo though, given the posts above
 
Re:

HelloDolly said:
It will be the Yates twins versus the French 3 Musketeers

Talking of which who is the french leader ? I suppose Allaphillipe but Bardet climbs better and is a top descender as well
Pinot though may have the best form
I'd say Pinot is the most likely to win. He neither has Alaphilippe's sprint nor Bardet's descent but he had a close to perfect preparation and has shown he can be very strong in mountainous one day races before (he was the only one with Nibali over the top of Civiglio in Lombardia last year)
 
Re:

HelloDolly said:
It will be the Yates twins versus the French 3 Musketeers

Talking of which who is the french leader ? I suppose Allaphillipe but Bardet climbs better and is a top descender as well
Pinot though may have the best form
Alaphilippe has the favors of french media, and he has the wins to back it up.

However, I'm with Gigs on this: Pinot is our best chance on this very hard parcours.
 
Re:

Rollthedice said:
I think the climbs are definitely selective enough. There might be a chance that nobody wants to move early and everything comes down to the final ramp (something I don't think will happen but apparently lots of experts do). In that case everything could theoretically come back together on the descent and the race could be decided in a sprint out of a small group, but then again I think even the likelihood of such a scenario is very small.

Cassani thinks that 10 seconds on top of the last climb is enough to win.

Remember the elite race, does Igls 3 more times AND a brutal 2,5 k steep climb, between the last Igls passage and the finish line, which means a very fast decent, and only a short 2,5 k flat run to the finish, from the bottom of the decent.

It's a very different finale to U23.
 
Re: Re:

RedheadDane said:
Broccolidwarf said:
RedheadDane said:
Okay, I know I'm overly focused on the Danes, but I'm gonna call it already:
The goal of four medals is not gonna be fulfilled!
Started out quite well, then they kinda faded.

We've got Cille tomorrow - fingers crossed - she would do an epic winners interview :p

She would do an epic interview if she got tenth!

Yeah, but imagine if she wins - her head will explode on camera :D

(and yes, it's a pipe dream, she needs a couple of years more, before she is a proper contender - 2020 will be her year ;) )
 
Re:

Alexandre B. said:
Anyway, each team will have to make the group that will inevitably form after Mohoric storms the descent on the fifth Igls passage.

There are a LOT of good decenders starting on Sunday - especially a lot of the classics guys are good technically and pretty fearless.

Btw 5th is early, that is with 3 climbs still to go.

Unfortunately it does not look like rain and cold until monday.... I wish the weather would speed up ;)
 
Re:

Alexandre B. said:
Anyway, each team will have to make the group that will inevitably form after Mohoric storms the descent on the fifth Igls passage.
That's indeed a good prediction. Although the decent isn't really that technical it has played an important role in every race so far. And someone Mohoric is probably the best bet to suddenly appear with a minute advantage in Innsbruck after the cameras lost track of him. And his captain is a capable descender as well.
 
Re: Re:

GuyIncognito said:
Rollthedice said:
I think the climbs are definitely selective enough. There might be a chance that nobody wants to move early and everything comes down to the final ramp (something I don't think will happen but apparently lots of experts do). In that case everything could theoretically come back together on the descent and the race could be decided in a sprint out of a small group, but then again I think even the likelihood of such a scenario is very small.

Cassani thinks that 10 seconds on top of the last climb is enough to win.

Mind you, last year he said anyone who had any gap at all at the top of the climb would win and there was zero chance of a sprint

Cassani is the guy who lost a 2 man sprint, for what would've been the biggest win of his career, to the worst sprinter in history by panicking and leading out with 700m to go. His stories are interesting but he's not exactly the sharpest tool :)

There's no radios so not all is lost. On the other hand Italy has been perfect in Rio and at the European Championships.
 
Re: Re:

Broccolidwarf said:
RedheadDane said:
Broccolidwarf said:
RedheadDane said:
Okay, I know I'm overly focused on the Danes, but I'm gonna call it already:
The goal of four medals is not gonna be fulfilled!
Started out quite well, then they kinda faded.

We've got Cille tomorrow - fingers crossed - she would do an epic winners interview :p

She would do an epic interview if she got tenth!

Yeah, but imagine if she wins - her head will explode on camera :D

Then I really hope she doesn't win…

"We have a new Elite Women's Road Racing World Champion!"

*BOOOOOM*

"Oh... ***. I think we need to, errr, cancel the podium ceremony and, err… STOP THE CAMERAS!"
 
Re: Re:

Broccolidwarf said:
RedheadDane said:
Broccolidwarf said:
RedheadDane said:
Okay, I know I'm overly focused on the Danes, but I'm gonna call it already:
The goal of four medals is not gonna be fulfilled!
Started out quite well, then they kinda faded.

We've got Cille tomorrow - fingers crossed - she would do an epic winners interview :p

She would do an epic interview if she got tenth!

Yeah, but imagine if she wins - her head will explode on camera :D

(and yes, it's a pipe dream, she needs a couple of years more, before she is a proper contender - 2020 will be her year ;) )
She needs a better course for 2020 for it to be her year. I'd say realistically she needs a couple of years for a course that has the perfect combination of being tough enough for Cille to be a frontline contender (she doesn't have too much of a sprint and will inevitably lose one to the likes of van Vleuten, Moolman-Pasio or Guarnier, so she needs it to be a small group, from which she can escape) but rolling enough that the Danes can protect her well or concern other teams with the likes of Mathiesen, Norsgaard and Dideriksen that they give Cille the rope. Otherwise she could be stuck in the same kind of position that we find Longo Borghini and Niewiadoma in at present, and Johansson before her (though Johansson had a sprint, she would always be outnumbered and even if she got the numbers level toward the end, she'd have had to do more work early on due to lacking helpers), a problem the Dutch juggernaut will not have.

It's only been duff tactics and duff courses that have cost the Dutch in recent years. They left too much to chance with Wild in 2016, and they fluffed having two women in a group of four in the European Games in 2015. Here, however, they have the top 2 favourites in Anna VDB and Annemiek, while Brand at least ought to be able to get over these climbs and if others don't make the racing too tough, van Dijk and Blaak are no mugs either. Ensing is a good climber but I suspect she'll be a workhorse here - I've been wrong in the past however, such as when van Vleuten was predicted to be a helper in Rio. There's so many cards for them to play that it will be both kind of disappointing if they do win and also a total travesty if they don't.

After all, which other teams are strong enough top down? Italy have Longo Borghini, sure, but Ratto's absent and only occasionally shows the strength she had five years ago, Guderzo's rainbow jersey feels like a long, long time ago now, Magnaldi's a good climber but not really any higher in level than Ensing who is further down the Dutch totem pole than she is the Italian, and apart from Cecchini (who has won on Supergà, but I think there's too many climbs for her here) the rest of the team is on the young side and probably needs another couple of years. The US team is fairly strong, but they've brought some sprinter types in the incredibly unlikely event that this is raced tamely enough to let Rivera or Ryan be there at the finish, which I doubt. Hall is a great climber but hasn't been quite as impressive in Europe this year as I had expected - she'll be a great right hand woman for Guarnier though, whose fast finish means that a rainbow jersey as a retirement present isn't out of the question. The only other team I think strong enough to pressure the Dutch is Australia, as Amanda Spratt has had a great season and Shara Gillow can climb. The problem they'll face is that their other quality climbing rider in the team is Lucy Kennedy, whose luck this season is such that I half expect her to get injured while warming up in the morning. No Shannon Malseed is a bit disappointing, I thought she's done decently in the hills this season.

For other teams, however, it's going to be more likely to require an inspired individual performance that proves decisive; racing aggressively to try to rid the group of as many of those Dutch domestiques as possible as soon as possible to even the odds. The obvious candidate for that, obviously, is Kasia Niewiadoma, who is coming off victory in the Tour de l'Ardêche so would appear to be in good climbing form. With the ever-combative Małgorzata Jasińska coming off a career season as her best aid, she'll need to try to form groups where it's tactically prudent for the Dutch to split their best riders - her lack of a sprint if a group comes to the line will potentially hurt her though. Ash Moolman-Pasio doesn't even have the luxury of helpers - she has only one compatriot in the race, 19-year-old Elne Owen, who has never raced a pro level UCI race at the senior age category before. Cille we've mentioned before, most of her support team is not built for climbing, so she may end up being most reliant on mountain biker Annika Langvad.

There are a couple of wildcards to point out though. Canada have a couple - Karol-Ann Canuel doesn't usually get to race for herself within the Boels train of pain, but she is a capable climber who's been top 10 in the Giro. Because she's usually riding for Guarnier, Deignan or van der Breggen we don't often get to see what her own punch or sprint are like, and she'll also have Leah Kirchmann for company on that team (oh, shout out to Ruth Winder, forgot to mention her when running down the US team earlier). The Spanish have been all over the climbing races since stage race season began, mainly with latecomer to the sport Margarita Victoria "Mavi" García and diminutive pocket climber Eider Merino; here the two Movistar riders are joined by Ane Santesteban, who was also climbing very well in the Giro. All of them come to play in the mountains, especially Merino whose skillset is very one-dimensional, but it must be noted that the parcours being circuits may be a problem for them because what goes up must come down and Basque climbers are not fabled for their descending prowess; García, the non-Basque among them, lost the Tour de l'Ardêche GC primarily on the descents after she and Merino were best on the climbs. The other real wildcard is Jolanda Neff, who races for Switzerland. The Swiss mountainbike specialist is an excellent climber and bike handler thanks to her MTB background, having finished twice top 10 - once on the podium - in the Trofeo Binda while riding for the tiny Servetto-Footon team, was top 10 of the Richmond Worlds and the 2016 Flèche Wallonne, won the Tour de Pologne by a street on a climby course not dissimilar in profile to Innsbruck and was top 10 in the Olympic Road Race - but has then stopped racing on the road entirely, resurfacing only to win this year's Swiss National Championship. As a result, she has all the tools to do well but her road form is complete and utter guesswork.

My best guess - and it is very much guesswork (for example, I've rated Brand so high as I think her likely to be a usable decoy that others mightn't chase, she's very good at winning solo, and her descending is second to none):

***: van der Breggen, van Vleuten
**: Guarnier, Moolman-Pasio, Niewiadoma, Longo Borghini, Brand
*: Spratt, van Dijk, Ludwig, Hall, Neff
 
Re:

Logic-is-your-friend said:
What are the chaces for non-Dutch women to win? 25%?
The only way I see is if one of the elite non-Dutch climbers, most likely Moolman-Pasio or Niewiadoma, can drop at least one of van der Breggen and van Vleuten on the climb to even the odds, and if it's Annemiek, by enough that she can't chase back on on the descent. If the Netherlands still have both of them in play in the closing stages, it's lights out. If they can drop one of them, then there's the chance that tactics in the run-in or a sprint from a group of 2-5 can see the Dutch lose out (well, to Ash. I'd back everybody in the Dutch team in a two-up sprint against Kasia or Elisa, except maybe Ensing and that's only cos we seldom see Janneke attempt a sprint to know if she's any good, or at least "not awful" which is probably enough), but dropping both of them is highly unlikely - especially as they will likely have the benefit of better protection early in the race and be able to play off one another to play tactics against others' likely isolated leaders.

The only other possibility is that Guarnier goes to a two-up sprint with either of them, because if it's not a straight two-up then nobody of the elite climbers will want to go to a sprint with Meg and the cohesion of the group will fall apart, and neither Annemiek nor Anna will want to risk losing the sprint; both are stronger rouleuses than Guarnier so would back themselves to take it home if they get a bit of separation and would likely want to use the other chasing on as an excuse to not work before trying to drop the American.
 
Re: Re:

SafeBet said:
Nirvana said:
Pozzovivo has said in the press conference today that is in the form of his life.
If they let him go in a late break with no top climbers could be Italy best option.
Even with top climbers if you ask me.
But if he follows top climbers it's a top ten, maybe top five, and Alaphilippe or Yates accelerations could be too much for him, if he'll go early he could be the strongest of a break on the wall and 10/15 seconds could be enough to not risk of being outsprinted from behind.
The one that should stay with the favourites is Moscon, we've seen last year in the Vuelta that he can put on devastating accelerations on muritos so he should be the last card to play if the favourites will catch everyone up on the road before the finish.
 
Re: Re:

GuyIncognito said:
Rollthedice said:
I think the climbs are definitely selective enough. There might be a chance that nobody wants to move early and everything comes down to the final ramp (something I don't think will happen but apparently lots of experts do). In that case everything could theoretically come back together on the descent and the race could be decided in a sprint out of a small group, but then again I think even the likelihood of such a scenario is very small.

Cassani thinks that 10 seconds on top of the last climb is enough to win.

Mind you, last year he said anyone who had any gap at all at the top of the climb would win and there was zero chance of a sprint

Cassani is the guy who lost a 2 man sprint, for what would've been the biggest win of his career, to the worst sprinter in history by panicking and leading out with 700m to go. His stories are interesting but he's not exactly the sharpest tool :)
I'd rate higher in the list when he gifted the win to Bruyneel despite being almost a minute ahead of him but started to act like he was on the track with Chiappucci in the last kilometer.