"The moment is right for the Americans to reflect upon why for the past 30 years they consented to having their elected representatives support a ruthless dictator such as Mubarak. It's the moment to ask, for example, what are the reasons that brought the current vice president, Joe Bidon, to affirm just last January 27th that Mubarak isn't a dictator."
Hisham Matar, noted Libyan writer and intellectual and author of Anatomy of a Disappearance, in an interview in New Yorker.
Hisham's father, Jaballa, disappeared from his apartment in Cairo in 1990. He was last seen over ten years ago detained in a Libyan prison, having been brought there by the Egyptian secret service at the behest of Mubarak and in collusion with Gaddafi, simply for having demanded the same freedoms and liberty for the Egyptians and Arabs of the Maghreb that are enjoyed by the people of the US and the West.
It's fine that the US and Europe now support the Arab springtime from Bahrain to Benghazi. However there isn't enough self-criticism. In the US congress and in all the Western parliaments there should be interrogations: how could we ever have supported, taken advantage of, exploited and encouraged the brutality of Arab dictators for 30 years? To what point had this cynical encouragement of these despots by us fueled and incremented the jihadist rage and Al Qaeda that the Western societies now ferociously try to keep at bay?
The West under US leadership has for a long time now been fully aware of the crimes of folks like Gaddafi and Hosini Mubarak. Whereas the "crime" of Jaballa Matar was having believed in the same freedom and democracy that was so cynically exploited by the former Bush administration to justify their ideological war for oil in Iraq.
Well the truth is that the Cairo-Tripoli axis was convenient. Mubarak and Gaddafi, because of their secret service, illegal detainments and the cold peace with Israel, were just as convenient for Egypt for Libyan oil and gas as it was for Libya. And all of this in the strategic sense, especially as regards Israel, was equally convenient to Washington and the governments of Europe.
There was one colossal problem, however, it wasn't at all convenient to the Arabs living under these heinous regimes we supported. But of course people like Scott SoCal and his conservative colleagues would never care a fig for this issue, because they only care about what they believe is good for themselves.
If we have supported these criminals, then we share in their crimes. And even if it were only one Jaballa Matar that has had to pay the unsupportable price of his own liberty because of this, then our governments, and hence the people who elected them, are all guilty of an injustice for which there is no moral alibi nor political justification. To the contrary, this is why America and the West has for some time lost all moral and ethical purchase in the region and this has fueled the same anti-Americanism and anti-Westernism that makes any military intervention now to help the Arab revolutionaries very risky business. Especially because it is all to easy to go in with fighter planes and bombs and ground troops, but all to difficult to get out.
The noted reporter Timothy Garton Ash in his book Facts are Subversive cites the Polish poet Czeslaw Milosz: "Don't think you are safe - the poet makes him remember - You can kill him, but another one will rise up in his place. The acts and words will be registered". The poet reminds us that the crimes of a Mubarak and a Gaddafi will be recorded for history and so too will our role in the disappearance of the Jaballa Matar and the innumerable dead who have given their lives for the cause of liberty and justice.
I have said this before: we are so concerned about our fears and interests that we have forgotten that it is really theirs, the Arabs during their democratic springtime, that one is talking about now. But this, evidently, Scott SoCal is incapable of understanding (or refuses to).