- Jun 22, 2009
- 4,991
- 1
- 0
42x16ss said:Yes, Islam has serious issues but this is going off the charts. These guys are whack jobs hoping for a reaction.
Interesting. Things must be different in Belgium because the anti immigration movement is coming from the right wing over here. Unlike Continental Europe Australia still has the capacity to expand and be inclusive of immigrants.Echoes said:42x16ss said:Yes, Islam has serious issues but this is going off the charts. These guys are whack jobs hoping for a reaction.
Islam is not the problem here. It's just an excuse found by left-winger to talk about immigration. As Adrien Abauzit suggests: "We may not talk about Maghrebis as Maghrebis because that would be racist but we may talk about them as Muslims because we may criticise religions."
But at least here in Belgium, Islam is totally off topic. In the sixties, it was no problem, we had full employment and needed workforce for our coal mines. But today, immigration becomes a problem because we got no more jobs to offer them and that they would inevitably fall into delinquence and riff raff, which are liberal phenomena that started with the youth culture of the sixties (mods, rockers, black jacket, etc.) here in Europe & the US, something that the liberals obviously don't want to see. It's a Western phenomenon, and it suggests self-criticism on our part. The theological canons of Islam however have nothing to do with this, they are more on the reaction side. That's what I been trying to explain to my dear friend BigMac but I don't know he reads me.![]()
42x16ss said:Interesting. Things must be different in Belgium because the anti immigration movement is coming from the right wing over here. Unlike Continental Europe Australia still has the capacity to expand and be inclusive of immigrants.Echoes said:42x16ss said:Yes, Islam has serious issues but this is going off the charts. These guys are whack jobs hoping for a reaction.
Islam is not the problem here. It's just an excuse found by left-winger to talk about immigration. As Adrien Abauzit suggests: "We may not talk about Maghrebis as Maghrebis because that would be racist but we may talk about them as Muslims because we may criticise religions."
But at least here in Belgium, Islam is totally off topic. In the sixties, it was no problem, we had full employment and needed workforce for our coal mines. But today, immigration becomes a problem because we got no more jobs to offer them and that they would inevitably fall into delinquence and riff raff, which are liberal phenomena that started with the youth culture of the sixties (mods, rockers, black jacket, etc.) here in Europe & the US, something that the liberals obviously don't want to see. It's a Western phenomenon, and it suggests self-criticism on our part. The theological canons of Islam however have nothing to do with this, they are more on the reaction side. That's what I been trying to explain to my dear friend BigMac but I don't know he reads me.![]()
You may not know this but Australia had a strict "White Australia Policy" regarding immigration that was only removed in the late 60's![]()
FoxxyBrown1111 said:bold:
It´s not funny, it´s smart. As you and I wouldn´t let in some street guys in our homes. Why should we?
So far, so good....
But really annoying and dangerous are those fake lefties who live behind their steel curtains, let nobody in their homes & mansions, "drink wine & preach water", but force those who can´t afford such "safe heavens", to live with the consequences of their let-them-all-in-politics.... And then those hypos call you "white supremascist".Disgusting, disgusting, and more disgusting... Hello Amsterhammer.
![]()
And that´s where everybody can help. As I did, in Africa, right at the front... where fake lefties never go: rural areas where battered women and kids live that never make it to the ships of the rapists (IOW: the so-called refugees that intrude Europe by tens of thousands)
Agree on that. Only that it´s the small "elite" of rich psychos doing/did the harm (latest example being Drone mass murder Obama & his gang of the fakiest lefties ever). So why shall the average Joe of Europe or USA pay the price?
wilders, pim fortuyn, theo van goghAmsterhammer said:I really wasn't aware that things were as different in Belgium as Echoes claims, and I have serious doubts about his take. In Holland, in Germany, and in France, anti-immigration and anti-Islamic sentiments are driven by the right wing, like foxxy's fellow travelers in Pegida, and like the revolting Geert Wilders here.
rhubroma said:FoxxyBrown1111 said:Amsterhammer said:Yes, all that and worse. Go play on 'stormfront' or on some other fascist, white supremacist page with your like minded far right goons. Your views are grossly offensive to any rational folks. I am severely biting my lip here so as to avoid a ban.
Yo lol. Saw it coming... Serious, everything I wrote has got nothing to do with "Stormfront", "white supremacist", or else slaps you try to make below waist line... Go back to school to improve your reading skills. That is all advice I can give.
All I did was (as usual) linking hard facts. And, also as usual, you counter with insults. Why? Because you have no arguments, thus playing the same old dumb game of calling those who don´t follow the ideologies of the blinded fake lefties as fascists.
If I take your thinking 100% serious, you also mean to call whole Australia as fascist, because they don´t follow your line.
Wow! The last guy I remember to insult a whole country was Lance Armstrong. You made it, going as low as him. Congrats.
Australians want to control immigration precisely to the degree that they don't need the riff raff and are safely ensconsed in their remote, prosperous, post-aboriginal haven. Funny how that works, doesn't it?
The only thing that is certain about the poor in Africa, is that they don't have a voice and they certainly don't have the right to a passport of access to the so called developed world.
The corollary of this, of course, has been the centuries of colonialism and overpowering that the West has brought, and certainly without even the need of a passport, into their domain.
blackcat said:theo van gogh
This is just some of the ramifications from our federal governments letting resources companies dictate the terms of their trading and investments. BHP averaging 0.002% tax?????? That is beyond ludicrous, yet there's right and centre commentators trying to say it's ok because of the employment.movingtarget said:rhubroma said:FoxxyBrown1111 said:Amsterhammer said:Yes, all that and worse. Go play on 'stormfront' or on some other fascist, white supremacist page with your like minded far right goons. Your views are grossly offensive to any rational folks. I am severely biting my lip here so as to avoid a ban.
Yo lol. Saw it coming... Serious, everything I wrote has got nothing to do with "Stormfront", "white supremacist", or else slaps you try to make below waist line... Go back to school to improve your reading skills. That is all advice I can give.
All I did was (as usual) linking hard facts. And, also as usual, you counter with insults. Why? Because you have no arguments, thus playing the same old dumb game of calling those who don´t follow the ideologies of the blinded fake lefties as fascists.
If I take your thinking 100% serious, you also mean to call whole Australia as fascist, because they don´t follow your line.
Wow! The last guy I remember to insult a whole country was Lance Armstrong. You made it, going as low as him. Congrats.
Australians want to control immigration precisely to the degree that they don't need the riff raff and are safely ensconsed in their remote, prosperous, post-aboriginal haven. Funny how that works, doesn't it?
The only thing that is certain about the poor in Africa, is that they don't have a voice and they certainly don't have the right to a passport of access to the so called developed world.
The corollary of this, of course, has been the centuries of colonialism and overpowering that the West has brought, and certainly without even the need of a passport, into their domain.
Australia is not the paradise many people think it is. The main thing in it's favour is it's remoteness from wars but I think sooner or later there will be a major terrorist incident in Australia. Especially with Australia always being involved in whatever is happening in the middle east. Rents are high, house prices in Sydney and Melbourne are over the top. 700 K won't get you a lot in Sydney. There is a rental crisis, not enough cheap housing, fulltime jobs are scarce especially outside Melbourne and Sydney. Universities continue to pump out thousands of graduates with little work for them. Australia is an aging population with 25% over 65. Yes the lifestyle is good but if you want to live more than the basic lifestyle you have to pay for it. It is cheaper for Australians to holiday in Bali or Asia than it is in Australia. The mineral boom is over and the mining industry has the arse falling out of it.
Many people took off for the mines to chase the dollars and now all of the jobs those people left are taken and people are holding onto jobs much longer. Australia is paying for it's inability to diversify and not invest locally in new technologies and alternative energy. Government cuts to research etc don't help. Australia's Medicare system and pension system is under extreme pressure. Youth unemployment is very high about 25% in some places. Yes the beer is cold the food is good, the sun shines, the beaches are there but scratch the surface and many people are stressed about their current situations and the future of the children. But next to many other countries as many Australians realize, it could always be much worse.
stealth ?blackcat said:42x16 its the IPA and the thinkw@nks from the american beltway have filtered their way by stealth to canberra
python said:stealth ?blackcat said:42x16 its the IPA and the thinkw@nks from the american beltway have filtered their way by stealth to canberra
wasn't it you, i had a quick convo recently about why the economically strong and secure ozzland became an american appendix.
you said something like, that's just the way it was and is historically. to which, w/o me doubting your facts about the land you live on, i stated my genuine surprise... thinking, many countries far less secure and much more dependent (and vulnerable to the uncle sam's ire) - chose a more independent being.
i still wonder the slavish foreign policy wisdom in the region where the australians are increasingly facing a choice btwn being drawn into a conflict with china against japan/us or just stay out and work productively with ALL sides.
the geopolitical power shift is obvious, the stubborn loyalty to the obsolete alliance is equally obvious...less obvious is the situation is due to something i dont understand or the plain lack of balls ?
these thoughts were brought to my mind after reading an article by your recently departed prime-minister frazer who was not imo the stupidest chap.
blackcat said:python, who else was in Korea AND Vietnam with the Americans?
the Australians were. google to tell me if anyone else was, but I doubt many if any were in either, yet both?
42x16ss said:This is just some of the ramifications from our federal governments letting resources companies dictate the terms of their trading and investments. BHP averaging 0.002% tax?????? That is beyond ludicrous, yet there's right and centre commentators trying to say it's ok because of the employment.movingtarget said:rhubroma said:FoxxyBrown1111 said:Amsterhammer said:Yes, all that and worse. Go play on 'stormfront' or on some other fascist, white supremacist page with your like minded far right goons. Your views are grossly offensive to any rational folks. I am severely biting my lip here so as to avoid a ban.
Yo lol. Saw it coming... Serious, everything I wrote has got nothing to do with "Stormfront", "white supremacist", or else slaps you try to make below waist line... Go back to school to improve your reading skills. That is all advice I can give.
All I did was (as usual) linking hard facts. And, also as usual, you counter with insults. Why? Because you have no arguments, thus playing the same old dumb game of calling those who don´t follow the ideologies of the blinded fake lefties as fascists.
If I take your thinking 100% serious, you also mean to call whole Australia as fascist, because they don´t follow your line.
Wow! The last guy I remember to insult a whole country was Lance Armstrong. You made it, going as low as him. Congrats.
Australians want to control immigration precisely to the degree that they don't need the riff raff and are safely ensconsed in their remote, prosperous, post-aboriginal haven. Funny how that works, doesn't it?
The only thing that is certain about the poor in Africa, is that they don't have a voice and they certainly don't have the right to a passport of access to the so called developed world.
The corollary of this, of course, has been the centuries of colonialism and overpowering that the West has brought, and certainly without even the need of a passport, into their domain.
Australia is not the paradise many people think it is. The main thing in it's favour is it's remoteness from wars but I think sooner or later there will be a major terrorist incident in Australia. Especially with Australia always being involved in whatever is happening in the middle east. Rents are high, house prices in Sydney and Melbourne are over the top. 700 K won't get you a lot in Sydney. There is a rental crisis, not enough cheap housing, fulltime jobs are scarce especially outside Melbourne and Sydney. Universities continue to pump out thousands of graduates with little work for them. Australia is an aging population with 25% over 65. Yes the lifestyle is good but if you want to live more than the basic lifestyle you have to pay for it. It is cheaper for Australians to holiday in Bali or Asia than it is in Australia. The mineral boom is over and the mining industry has the arse falling out of it.
Many people took off for the mines to chase the dollars and now all of the jobs those people left are taken and people are holding onto jobs much longer. Australia is paying for it's inability to diversify and not invest locally in new technologies and alternative energy. Government cuts to research etc don't help. Australia's Medicare system and pension system is under extreme pressure. Youth unemployment is very high about 25% in some places. Yes the beer is cold the food is good, the sun shines, the beaches are there but scratch the surface and many people are stressed about their current situations and the future of the children. But next to many other countries as many Australians realize, it could always be much worse.
If a realistic tax structure was put in place for Rio Tinto, BHP-Billiton etc in the late 90's when investment was booming this country would be financially self sufficient for decades but our leaders cannot govern past their investment portfolios and the one PM who tried was completely lynched in the media.
blackcat said:python said:stealth ?blackcat said:42x16 its the IPA and the thinkw@nks from the american beltway have filtered their way by stealth to canberra
wasn't it you, i had a quick convo recently about why the economically strong and secure ozzland became an american appendix.
you said something like, that's just the way it was and is historically. to which, w/o me doubting your facts about the land you live on, i stated my genuine surprise... thinking, many countries far less secure and much more dependent (and vulnerable to the uncle sam's ire) - chose a more independent being.
i still wonder the slavish foreign policy wisdom in the region where the australians are increasingly facing a choice btwn being drawn into a conflict with china against japan/us or just stay out and work productively with ALL sides.
the geopolitical power shift is obvious, the stubborn loyalty to the obsolete alliance is equally obvious...less obvious is the situation is due to something i dont understand or the plain lack of balls ?
these thoughts were brought to my mind after reading an article by your recently departed prime-minister frazer who was not imo the stupidest chap.
i think I said something about Whitlam did not eye, and when the Gov'r General and Opposition (Malcolm Fraser's torys) removed/denied confidence (GG) and the Torys denied supply in the upper house.
You know the epigram about American Embassies and coups. Well, young politicians, or advisors, the political class, they foment connections and dialogue in the american consulates here. They know that strong relationships can help them in the future.
Around WWII, was when we pivoted (sic, intentionally using the whitehouse word), we pivoted from the Empire and the old country, to being in the Americans orbit.
I cant see this changing, even if there is a hot-war with Taiwan-China and the Americans being drawn in, we will get drawn in.
This is the paper you would have read that Fraser was on about, and PJK(90s PrimeMinister KEating), and the ANU International Affairs Professor, Hugh White. (think JohnsHopkins strategy dude)
know this. the trading co-dependent r/ship. niall ferguson's chimerica.Bustedknuckle said:Won't happen. In spite of China-Taiwan saber rattling, they are really quite dependent, economically, with one another. PLUS in spite of China's bluster, they still spend a fraction of what the other 'big boys' do on defense. China isn't going to invade Taiwan any time soon, they have no amphibious navy nor the air power to do it.
China is growing but they are still a 2.5 world nation in terms of their military. They just have a HUGE army, but gotta move them, support them...
