- Sep 25, 2009
- 7,527
- 1
- 0
^^so far, the absolute majority of the 'news' re the israel-iran military activity is based on the israel official statements. i have even less trust in them than in the official syrian or iranian sources...always arrogant boasting even if part true. i also doubt that bibi, as the same media reported, got a full approval from vlad.
regarding the european response to the us economic blackmail (both wrt to new iranian sanctions and the earlier tariffs on iron and aluminum), it is true that europe is trying to negotiate its way out, but having seen the american reaction so far - which is to give the partners a postponement window - while holding a loaded gun to their head. sooner or later, such a tactic has to be faced with firmer retaliatory actions b/c the us is getting away with its political and trade ultimatums. swallowing it will only cause more blackmail.
it is fair for the us to pass any domestic law re the iran sanctions, but expecting the rest of the world complying with the american law - 'or else' - is beyond arrogant.
the typical american tools of 'compelling' are the usual threats to foreign banks and businesses that exploit the dolar's central role in world trading or the bans on any american parts if an item of trade (say, for example, airbus) contains sub-systems patented by or manufactured in america. given the global penetration of business, it is impossible to find ANY car or airplane that's 100% dependent on one supplier...
what the europeans need to get the f-king balls and start doing is to apply the same logic to american companies dependent on european markets or suppliers. and, most importantly, to give full state protection to those companies likely hurt by the dollar operations restrictions. a limited trade war, if it was what trump was looking for, has to be thrown back at him. and it is not all that scary, b/c such HUGE markets as chinese, indian, russian etc are suffering the same trade arrogance and are likely to cooperate with europe instead of the bullies from americam...just thinking aloud.
regarding the european response to the us economic blackmail (both wrt to new iranian sanctions and the earlier tariffs on iron and aluminum), it is true that europe is trying to negotiate its way out, but having seen the american reaction so far - which is to give the partners a postponement window - while holding a loaded gun to their head. sooner or later, such a tactic has to be faced with firmer retaliatory actions b/c the us is getting away with its political and trade ultimatums. swallowing it will only cause more blackmail.
it is fair for the us to pass any domestic law re the iran sanctions, but expecting the rest of the world complying with the american law - 'or else' - is beyond arrogant.
the typical american tools of 'compelling' are the usual threats to foreign banks and businesses that exploit the dolar's central role in world trading or the bans on any american parts if an item of trade (say, for example, airbus) contains sub-systems patented by or manufactured in america. given the global penetration of business, it is impossible to find ANY car or airplane that's 100% dependent on one supplier...
what the europeans need to get the f-king balls and start doing is to apply the same logic to american companies dependent on european markets or suppliers. and, most importantly, to give full state protection to those companies likely hurt by the dollar operations restrictions. a limited trade war, if it was what trump was looking for, has to be thrown back at him. and it is not all that scary, b/c such HUGE markets as chinese, indian, russian etc are suffering the same trade arrogance and are likely to cooperate with europe instead of the bullies from americam...just thinking aloud.