World Politics

Page 749 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
May 14, 2010
5,303
4
0
Re:

rhubroma said:
It's important to remember what is useful, not expedient.

Almost all the terrorism is perpetrated from the sons of immigrants from the Magherb. The fathers conformed to non-acceptance under the circumstantial regime. Having been uprooted from the old colony of provenance, they unstoically molded their rancor on their sons. The sons, under the same conditions, didn't accept the holes in the soul their fathers were willing to put down against their will. Eventually they have found their "identity" among hacks and charlatans and the fatal consequences this presupposes.

I'm not buying. Look at what Attaturk did with, or to, Islam and Arabism. He didn't have this problem, or not anywhere to this extent, anyway. (Likewise, on a smaller but no less potentially lethal scale, Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore.)
 
Re: Re:

Maxiton said:
rhubroma said:
It's important to remember what is useful, not expedient.

Almost all the terrorism is perpetrated from the sons of immigrants from the Magherb. The fathers conformed to non-acceptance under the circumstantial regime. Having been uprooted from the old colony of provenance, they unstoically molded their rancor on their sons. The sons, under the same conditions, didn't accept the holes in the soul their fathers were willing to put down against their will. Eventually they have found their "identity" among hacks and charlatans and the fatal consequences this presupposes.

I'm not buying. Look at what Attaturk did with, or to, Islam and Arabism. He didn't have this problem, or not anywhere to this extent, anyway. (Likewise, on a smaller but no less potentially lethal scale, Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore.)

That was in the Muslim context...Lee Kuan Yew was Cambridge forged under circumstances not comparable to the inimical rapor between Europe and its Arabic ventures. I don't see a mass Singaporean ired class in the various banlieue around these parts. Context is of course everything.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
i don't think western state terrorism is more or less sick than individual (let's say islamic) terrorism.
The recipients/objects of state terrorism typically (feel they) have no fair means to defend themselves, leading to a deeply ingrained sense of humiliation and injustice, that in turn invoking terrorist acts of revenge. Such terrorist acts of revenge are thus legitimate in the eyes of (most of) the recipients/objects of state terror.
So whereas it's hard to argue that muslim countries invoke western state terrorism, reversely it's quite easy to argue that western countries invoke/invite islamic terrorism.
I'm not saying that if western state terrorism would stop tomorrow, islamic terrrorism would stop tomorrow. Surely Islamic terrorism wouldn't stop tomorrow, simply because it has by now grown into a whole different dimension; it's no longer just acts of revenge, it's an industry.
But stopping western state terrorism would at least take all remaining legitimacy away from islamic terrorism.
 
May 14, 2010
5,303
4
0
Re: Re:

rhubroma said:
Maxiton said:
rhubroma said:
It's important to remember what is useful, not expedient.

Almost all the terrorism is perpetrated from the sons of immigrants from the Magherb. The fathers conformed to non-acceptance under the circumstantial regime. Having been uprooted from the old colony of provenance, they unstoically molded their rancor on their sons. The sons, under the same conditions, didn't accept the holes in the soul their fathers were willing to put down against their will. Eventually they have found their "identity" among hacks and charlatans and the fatal consequences this presupposes.

I'm not buying. Look at what Attaturk did with, or to, Islam and Arabism. He didn't have this problem, or not anywhere to this extent, anyway. (Likewise, on a smaller but no less potentially lethal scale, Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore.)

That was in the Muslim context...Lee Kuan Yew was Cambridge forged under circumstances not comparable to the inimical rapor between Europe and its Arabic ventures. I don't see a mass Singaporean ired class in the various banlieue around these parts. Context is of course everything.

I don't see how you can dismiss what Attaturk did with the simple sentence "That was in the Muslim context". It may appear to us to be "the Muslim context" but just try posing that suggestion to the Muslims of his place and time. It's true that he did not succeed in fully modernizing Turkish Islam, but he certainly went a long way towards it, and secularized the state. As to your other objection, most of Europe's Arabic ventures, historically, have an Oxbridge source, or at least rely on Oxbridge expertise, just as in Singapore.

I don't think Islam is all that intractable, truth be known. Where it has regressed, or remains regressive, it does so for purposes other than its own.
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
Re:

sniper said:
i don't think western state terrorism is more or less sick than individual (let's say islamic) terrorism.
The recipients/objects of state terrorism typically (feel they) have no fair means to defend themselves, leading to a deeply ingrained sense of humiliation and injustice, that in turn invoking terrorist acts of revenge. Such terrorist acts of revenge are thus legitimate in the eyes of (most of) the recipients/objects of state terror.
So whereas it's hard to argue that muslim countries invoke western state terrorism, reversely it's quite easy to argue that western countries invoke/invite islamic terrorism.
I'm not saying that if western state terrorism would stop tomorrow, islamic terrrorism would stop tomorrow. Surely Islamic terrorism wouldn't stop tomorrow, simply because it has by now grown into a whole different dimension; it's no longer just acts of revenge, it's an industry.
But stopping western state terrorism would at least take all remaining legitimacy away from islamic terrorism.

....indeed !....

Cheers
 
Re: Re:

Maxiton said:
rhubroma said:
Maxiton said:
rhubroma said:
It's important to remember what is useful, not expedient.

Almost all the terrorism is perpetrated from the sons of immigrants from the Magherb. The fathers conformed to non-acceptance under the circumstantial regime. Having been uprooted from the old colony of provenance, they unstoically molded their rancor on their sons. The sons, under the same conditions, didn't accept the holes in the soul their fathers were willing to put down against their will. Eventually they have found their "identity" among hacks and charlatans and the fatal consequences this presupposes.

I'm not buying. Look at what Attaturk did with, or to, Islam and Arabism and in vastly different times. He didn't have this problem, or not anywhere to this extent, anyway. (Likewise, on a smaller but no less potentially lethal scale, Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore.)

That was in the Muslim context...Lee Kuan Yew was Cambridge forged under circumstances not comparable to the inimical rapor between Europe and its Arabic ventures. I don't see a mass Singaporean ired class in the various banlieue around these parts. Context is of course everything.

I don't see how you can dismiss what Attaturk did with the simple sentence "That was in the Muslim context". It may appear to us to be "the Muslim context" but just try posing that suggestion to the Muslims of his place and time. It's true that he did not succeed in fully modernizing Turkish Islam, but he certainly went a long way towards it, and secularized the state. As to your other objection, most of Europe's Arabic ventures, historically, have an Oxbridge source, or at least rely on Oxbridge expertise, just as in Singapore.

I don't think Islam is all that intractable, truth be known. Where it has regressed, or remains regressive, it does so for purposes other than its own.

You've missed my point and made an incongruent comparison.

Attaturk's agenda was pushed in a country with a long sovereign history of its own. Though under Mr. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Turkey has certainly regressed. By contrast, the Magrheb nations were fabricated under colonial impetus. A colonial impetus that, for many factors, has in its wake contributed to fabricating monsters. The majority of terrorists in Europe are, as I have previously stated, the sons of immigrants from the Magrheb. This is a fact. It is thus a home grown phenomenon. These folks were never given, nor have they absorbed the cultural values of the places from which their parents came, but the rancor yes.

Not having been transmitted a solid foundation, an alive and serene culture - neither from their parents, nor from the ex-colonial occupier, now unwilling heir - they have from the slums been left to the streets, pure case, destiny. But this wasn't a fortuitous ontology.

In France immigration is one of the consequences of colonialization, which isn't the case with Turks. The immigrant population didn't benefit from recognition, nor was it given attention, but only the banlieues. Racism developed in enormous proportions, above all after the war in Algeria (1954-1962). The repatriated from Algeria suffered for the loss of what they considered their homeland. The nasty conditions and painful return to France, was thus accompanied by a sense of injustice and resentment. The immigrants, notwithstanding the work they performed, didn't receive a correct and dignified treatment. And they kept quiet. However the fathers did transmit the sense of defeat and impotance to their sons (and their sons, sons). Some of these latter, consciously or unconsciously, have desired to "vindicate" their fathers by killing innocents.

The vast magority of immigrant sons were transmitted this ontological insecurity, though despite this fortunately haven't take up jihad. Yet it is upon this facet that the "Islamic State" attempts to gain recruits through its diabolical propaganda. By promissing vendetta and death, in assuring a radiant future to these abandoned teens of Europe, it provides them on the one hand with a way out and, on the other, an objective that gives their lives a sense. It says: "You haven't found a sense to your lives, well then, we propose giving a sense to your deaths by fighting on the "Road to God" ( Fi sabilillah), which leads to paradise." At the same time it presents the West as purely materialistic, devoid of any spirituality and without those divine values it regards as the beginning and the end of humanity. Certain immigrant sons have taken to heart this sermon and were disposed to follow its calling to the bitter end.

Sniper's reference to an "industry" of jihad is thus not that far fetched. I'd say, among privileged Arabs today, the Oxbridge source is purely formal and instrumental in forging the future business class to the oppressive regimes. On a contrary note, however, I did recently meet two Saudi Arabian women traveling alone, without hijabs, secular and fully contemporary in the usual Western sense. Never having been to Saudi Arabia they said, when I asked, they probably represented about 10% of their population and that they needed to be very discrete and prudent with it not to get incarcerated.

PS. As far as the "Muslim context" goes its important to distinguish Turks from Arabs, the latter having also been inflamed, by now for decades, by what is regard as the Palestinian genocide.
 
"Sniper's reference to an "industry" of jihad is thus not that far fetched. I'd say, among privileged Arabs today, the Oxbridge source is purely formal and instrumental in forging the future business class to the oppressive regimes. On a contrary note, however, I did recently meet two Saudi Arabian women traveling alone, without hijabs, secular and fully contemporary in the usual Western sense. Never having been to Saudi Arabia they said, when I asked, they probably represented about 10% of their population and that they needed to be very descrete and prudent with it not to get incarcerated."

Sniper's term can be recast as modernized "primitive accumulation" for anyone arguing with it.

And it's true: Saudi Women as you describe were not uncommon when I worked in the region. But mainly privileged ones in circumscribed situations.
 
Re:

aphronesis said:
"Sniper's reference to an "industry" of jihad is thus not that far fetched. I'd say, among privileged Arabs today, the Oxbridge source is purely formal and instrumental in forging the future business class to the oppressive regimes. On a contrary note, however, I did recently meet two Saudi Arabian women traveling alone, without hijabs, secular and fully contemporary in the usual Western sense. Never having been to Saudi Arabia they said, when I asked, they probably represented about 10% of their population and that they needed to be very descrete and prudent with it not to get incarcerated."

Sniper's term can be recast as modernized "primitive accumulation" for anyone arguing with it.

And it's true: Saudi Women as you describe were not uncommon when I worked in the region. But mainly privileged ones in circumscribed situations.

Highly circumscribed.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
palmyra is finally freed of the savages.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-palmyra-idUSKCN0WT04R?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews

the heavy fighting has been reported for days. curiously, all the victorious images lack the city per se...no buildings in the background or foreground, no standing up or down structures - just the yellow desert and weapons...i hope this is because the photo reporters were not allowed into a booby-trapped city yet and not another hoax...

interestingly, while no details are available from the smoldering city, the omnipresent london-based 'observatory for (get it!) for human rights is already in with its dead body counts :rolleyes: how the hell this abdurahman head guy is able to pinpoint dead all over syria - from his london flat, mind you ! - before the victors and the defeated even had the chance to recognize their fallen :confused:

its truly amazing that this long discredited 'source' is continually quoted in the western media.
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
Re:

python said:
palmyra is finally freed of the savages.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-palmyra-idUSKCN0WT04R?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews

the heavy fighting has been reported for days. curiously, all the victorious images lack the city per se...no buildings in the background or foreground, no standing up or down structures - just the yellow desert and weapons...i hope this is because the photo reporters were not allowed into a booby-trapped city yet and not another hoax...

interestingly, while no details are available from the smoldering city, the omnipresent london-based 'observatory for (get it!) for human rights is already in with its dead body counts :rolleyes: how the hell this abdurahman head guy is able to pinpoint dead all over syria - from his london flat, mind you ! - before the victors and the defeated even had the chance to recognize their fallen :confused:

its truly amazing that this long discredited 'source' is continually quoted in the western media.

....Who says What about Whom and Why....the MSM just gotta feed that fabulous fable maw and numbers is good to give the story some fibre ( gets it thru the system more better eh...then you can serve up the next deicious story )...

Cheers
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
Re: Re:

blutto said:
python said:
palmyra is finally freed of the savages.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-palmyra-idUSKCN0WT04R?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews

the heavy fighting has been reported for days. curiously, all the victorious images lack the city per se...no buildings in the background or foreground, no standing up or down structures - just the yellow desert and weapons...i hope this is because the photo reporters were not allowed into a booby-trapped city yet and not another hoax...

interestingly, while no details are available from the smoldering city, the omnipresent london-based 'observatory for (get it!) for human rights is already in with its dead body counts :rolleyes: how the hell this abdurahman head guy is able to pinpoint dead all over syria - from his london flat, mind you ! - before the victors and the defeated even had the chance to recognize their fallen :confused:

its truly amazing that this long discredited 'source' is continually quoted in the western media.

....Who says What about Whom and Why....the MSM just gotta feed that fabulous fable maw and numbers is good to give the story some fibre ( gets it thru the system more better eh...then you can serve up the next deicious story )...

Cheers
perhaps you are right...personally, i can't take a source, any source, seriously, if it fails an obvious common sense check.

in this case, it was something like mere hours after the syrian news agency (sana) announced the victory at palmyra. and here the 'human observatory' already identified, counted and differentiated the hundreds of fallen fighters...a tad too neat and expeditious for the corpses scattered all over and in many cases too gruesome and in several pieces. even if we assume the body counts came from the sources inside the warring sides, it would be too fantastic b/c they themselves are still unaware of the full extent of their losses.

but if we assume that the 'human observatory' got its numbers from an m5 or m6 office just across the london street, everything falls into place beautifully.

my point is simply that thoughtless, uncritical reading has become a staple in the west. and unfortunately, such a tendency has been exploited time and again to sell us all sorts of half truths and downright lies....not that it's much different in the vlad domain. but at least over there no one claims the falsehood about the 'highest, freest and most democratic' standard...my ardse :rolleyes:
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
Re: Re:

python said:
blutto said:
python said:
palmyra is finally freed of the savages.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-palmyra-idUSKCN0WT04R?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews

the heavy fighting has been reported for days. curiously, all the victorious images lack the city per se...no buildings in the background or foreground, no standing up or down structures - just the yellow desert and weapons...i hope this is because the photo reporters were not allowed into a booby-trapped city yet and not another hoax...

interestingly, while no details are available from the smoldering city, the omnipresent london-based 'observatory for (get it!) for human rights is already in with its dead body counts :rolleyes: how the hell this abdurahman head guy is able to pinpoint dead all over syria - from his london flat, mind you ! - before the victors and the defeated even had the chance to recognize their fallen :confused:

its truly amazing that this long discredited 'source' is continually quoted in the western media.

....Who says What about Whom and Why....the MSM just gotta feed that fabulous fable maw and numbers is good to give the story some fibre ( gets it thru the system more better eh...then you can serve up the next deicious story )...

Cheers
perhaps you are right...personally, i can't take a source, any source, seriously, if it fails an obvious common sense check.

in this case, it was something like mere hours after the syrian news agency (sana) announced the victory at palmyra. and here the 'human observatory' already identified, counted and differentiated the hundreds of fallen fighters...a tad too neat and expeditious for the corpses scattered all over and in many cases too gruesome and in several pieces. even if we assume the body counts came from the sources inside the warring sides, it would be too fantastic b/c they themselves are still unaware of the full extent of their losses.

but if we assume that the 'human observatory' got its numbers from an m5 or m6 office just across the london street, everything falls into place beautifully.

my point is simply that thoughtless, uncritical reading has become a staple in the west. and unfortunately, such a tendency has been exploited time and again to sell us all sorts of half truths and downright lies....not that it's much different in the vlad domain. but at least over there no one claims the falsehood about the 'highest, freest and most democratic' standard...my ardse :rolleyes:

....youse gotta be real careful with that common sense thingee, eh....its a funny thing with a myriad of uses, sometimes its good for filtering out $h!te, other times as camouflage for $h!te...multiuse or what...

....the scary thing with, uhhh, common sense is that it is often also used to feed the story, to drive it along by skilled practitioners in the art of manure spreading...."facts" can easily be folded into common sense based frameworks to produce desired direction that is often dubious..." well everyone knows Islam is a violent religion that is hell-bent on world domination" so of course "it makes sense " that, fill in blank here, was an attack by Islamic Jihadi elements bent on world domination...and oh look over there, we just found a passport/laptop/plans to really prove it....

...this is not to point a finger at you here...its just that reading your post sparked the above comment that refers to something entirely different.....the common thread just happens to be common sense...

Cheers
 
tumblr_o4t5wkL3r01qdlsmzo1_1280.jpg
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
....hahahaha....

he prosecution of a Swedish national accused of terrorist activities in Syria has collapsed at the Old Bailey after it became clear Britain’s security and intelligence agencies would have been deeply embarrassed had a trial gone ahead, the Guardian can reveal.

His lawyers argued that British intelligence agencies were supporting the same Syrian opposition groups as he was, and were party to a secret operation providing weapons and non-lethal help to the groups, including the Free Syrian Army.

Bherlin Gildo, 37, who was arrested last October on his way from Copenhagen to Manila, was accused of attending a terrorist training camp and receiving weapons training between 31 August 2012 and 1 March 2013 as well as possessing information likely to be useful to a terrorist

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/01/trial-swedish-man-accused-terrorism-offences-collapse-bherlin-gildo

....and with the CIA "friends" fighting the Pentagon "pals" this is turning into the outline for the Adam Sandler/Coen Brothers collaboration we have all been waiting for....

Cheers
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
...and speaking of capitulation....the once proud British tradition of burning mountains of coal and producing clouds of toxic smoke is sadly waning and may soon disappear....boohoo....boohoo...what are those people going to do with their lives... :eek: ....

....'cause apparently, that vaunted all conquering conspiracy of crazed scientists and hapless hippies is succeeding in fooling the world with their mad ideas and is now well on the way to realize their dream of taking over the world and turning it into a vegetarian paradise ( and probably complete with communistical single payer health care that is completely and utterly free )....

Rapid decline of coal use leads to drop in UK emissions

Plummeting coal use in 2015 led to a fall of 4% in the UK’s annual carbon dioxide emissions, according to government energy statistics published on Thursday. Coal is now burning at its lowest level in at least 150 years.

The closing of old polluting coal-power stations and the rapid rise in renewable energy meant coal consumption fell by 22% compared to 2014, the biggest drop ever seen outside of miners’ strikes, according to analysts at Carbon Brief. Production of coal in the UK also fell to a new record low, dropping by 27% due to mines closing.

The rapid decline in coal use is continuing in 2016, with four more stations closed in the last fortnight, including Longannet, Ferrybridge and Eggborough, leaving six operational. The government has pledged to close all coal plants by 2025 to help meet climate change targets.

Renewable electricity generation surged in 2015, rising by 29%, allowing it to claim a record 25% share of all electricity. Most of this came from wind power and bioenergy, the latter being boosted by the continued conversion of Drax - once the UK’s biggest coal plant - to burning wood pellets.

Solar power increased by 50% in 2015 to make up 9% of all renewable electricity. The government has been repeatedly criticised for cutting support for renewable energy and energy efficiency programmes.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/mar/31/rapid-decline-of-coal-use-leads-to-drop-in-uk-emissions

Cheers
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
...i continue to be fascinated by the turkish role - if not not to put it more bluntly, their stupidity - regarding what they do/did/or plan to do in syria and iraq .... :confused:

several very visible (and 1-2 less so) events have been taking place concerning the matter as i type.

...it's hardly a news that obama and erdogan have been at odds in syria and iraq . to add some insult to their injury, it was widely reported that obama chose to publicly snub the erdo-man by refusing to meet the sultan while his highness is attending the the obama brain fart on the nuclear security taking place in washington right now...

btw, of the 50 or so heads of state currently in attendance there is no tzar of one state that really matters in the nuclear material safeguarding - the obama obsessive idea he wants to become his legacy. to the point, in his turn, his darkness tsar vladmir decided to snub obama by his absence as if reminding that w/o russia ANY nuclear/anti-nuclear/pro-nuclear initiatives are little more than a dud.

not that vlad is a comple dijk -- as is well known by now, he was/is working quite productively with america on the iran nukes and now on getting a political solution to syria. add to this the sensational lebanese paper article TODAY that kerry and lavrov agreed on the assad exit - the main demand of the syrian rebels

and what did erdogan do today to complicate everything ?

he made an interesting move vlad had long demanded of him. the details are still obscure, but the killer of the turkey-down russian jet pilot who ejected over syria had been arrested TODAY. that's what the turkish govt mouth piece hurriet paper printed.

i have no idea what's going on, but wish that turkey and its sultan see the light. we all, will win then.
i
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
....an article that runs against the usual Western MSM narratives....

The United States cooked up the idea of using fundamentalist-Sunni, Saudi-led-and-inspired mujahedeen, or Taliban, as cheap fanatics to fight against the Soviet Union in 1979 in Afghanistan; and, then, after thus draining and ending the USSR by 1991, the royal Sauds and their friends US Presidents – starting with the Bushes but including Clinton(s) and Obama – have continued it as a bad habit, which got out of control and has now ultimately forced millions of Syrians (and Libyans etc.) to leave their jihadist-infested homelands to seek safety in Europe.

This influx is too many refugees, too fast for Europe (or anywhere) to absorb, and so has created a crisis which threatens the continued existence of the EU. Has Russia now effectively come to the rescue and saved the EU, and perhaps placed the US-Saudi fundamentalist-Sunni genie back into its bloody destructive bottle? Perhaps so.

....and this little bit....the latest in the follow the money, or in this case, the pipelines game....

Palmyra is in the very heart of the vast Sunni-dominated part of Syria – the part that the US and its fundamentalist-Sunni allies have been wanting especially to control so as to build, through that currently fundamentalist-Sunni-controlled area, oil and gas pipelines for Saudi Arabia and Qatar to transport their oil and gas into the EU. Here’s a map showing how central Palmyra is in the Sunni or ISIS-held region of Syria:

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/eric-zuesse/66704/has-russia-now-salvaged-europe

....so the story so far....hundreds of thousands of people die and a country utterly destroyed so a pipeline can be pushed thru....terrorist blowback increases reach of security services in the West...win win....and a bevy of lunatics are in the running for the presidency...win win win..."the future is bright I gotta wear shades"....( there really should be a facetious emoticon, gawd knows I could use it... )

Cheers
 
May 14, 2010
5,303
4
0
Re:

blutto said:
....an article that runs against the usual Western MSM narratives....

The United States cooked up the idea of using fundamentalist-Sunni, Saudi-led-and-inspired mujahedeen, or Taliban, as cheap fanatics to fight against the Soviet Union in 1979 in Afghanistan; and, then, after thus draining and ending the USSR by 1991, the royal Sauds and their friends US Presidents – starting with the Bushes but including Clinton(s) and Obama – have continued it as a bad habit, which got out of control and has now ultimately forced millions of Syrians (and Libyans etc.) to leave their jihadist-infested homelands to seek safety in Europe.

This influx is too many refugees, too fast for Europe (or anywhere) to absorb, and so has created a crisis which threatens the continued existence of the EU. Has Russia now effectively come to the rescue and saved the EU, and perhaps placed the US-Saudi fundamentalist-Sunni genie back into its bloody destructive bottle? Perhaps so.

....and this little bit....the latest in the follow the money, or in this case, the pipelines game....

Palmyra is in the very heart of the vast Sunni-dominated part of Syria – the part that the US and its fundamentalist-Sunni allies have been wanting especially to control so as to build, through that currently fundamentalist-Sunni-controlled area, oil and gas pipelines for Saudi Arabia and Qatar to transport their oil and gas into the EU. Here’s a map showing how central Palmyra is in the Sunni or ISIS-held region of Syria:

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/eric-zuesse/66704/has-russia-now-salvaged-europe

....so the story so far....hundreds of thousands of people die and a country utterly destroyed so a pipeline can be pushed thru....terrorist blowback increases reach of security services in the West...win win....and a bevy of lunatics are in the running for the presidency...win win win..."the future is bright I gotta wear shades"....( there really should be a facetious emoticon, gawd knows I could use it... )

Cheers

Here ya go.

Cool.png


Best I could do on short notice.
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
Re: Re:

Maxiton said:
blutto said:
....an article that runs against the usual Western MSM narratives....

The United States cooked up the idea of using fundamentalist-Sunni, Saudi-led-and-inspired mujahedeen, or Taliban, as cheap fanatics to fight against the Soviet Union in 1979 in Afghanistan; and, then, after thus draining and ending the USSR by 1991, the royal Sauds and their friends US Presidents – starting with the Bushes but including Clinton(s) and Obama – have continued it as a bad habit, which got out of control and has now ultimately forced millions of Syrians (and Libyans etc.) to leave their jihadist-infested homelands to seek safety in Europe.

This influx is too many refugees, too fast for Europe (or anywhere) to absorb, and so has created a crisis which threatens the continued existence of the EU. Has Russia now effectively come to the rescue and saved the EU, and perhaps placed the US-Saudi fundamentalist-Sunni genie back into its bloody destructive bottle? Perhaps so.

....and this little bit....the latest in the follow the money, or in this case, the pipelines game....

Palmyra is in the very heart of the vast Sunni-dominated part of Syria – the part that the US and its fundamentalist-Sunni allies have been wanting especially to control so as to build, through that currently fundamentalist-Sunni-controlled area, oil and gas pipelines for Saudi Arabia and Qatar to transport their oil and gas into the EU. Here’s a map showing how central Palmyra is in the Sunni or ISIS-held region of Syria:

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/eric-zuesse/66704/has-russia-now-salvaged-europe

....so the story so far....hundreds of thousands of people die and a country utterly destroyed so a pipeline can be pushed thru....terrorist blowback increases reach of security services in the West...win win....and a bevy of lunatics are in the running for the presidency...win win win..."the future is bright I gotta wear shades"....( there really should be a facetious emoticon, gawd knows I could use it... )

Cheers

Here ya go.

Cool.png


Best I could do on short notice.

...or maybe something with a prominent tongue in cheek....anyways we should work on that...copy write it and make a fortune....because I feel there is a great need for that thingee there, the crowd is just screaming for it...

...just googled facetious images and its very confusing....this culture definitely needs a firm hand in this situation to give it some direction....

Cheers
 
Talking about the EU, in the UK the latest polls show the Leave group leading by 4. So, as it's British pollsters, it's probably 60-40 for stay.

In all seriousness, the Leave campaign could well take the UK out of Europe and Cameron out of PM. On a wider scale, it probably means traction for anti-EU parties in Europe, Austria especially and Le Pen too, although IIRC Le Pen is not strictly anti-EU. Brussels won't be too happy, although considering how China is toying with the UK at the moment it may work out quite well for the EU, if they (UK) then turn out to be as incompetent in dealings with the EU than with China.
 
A while back I quoted an American businessman very familiar with Russia who suggested Putin might be the richest man in the world. The Guardian just published a story shedding more light on that claim:

A network of secret offshore deals and vast loans worth $2bn has laid a trail to Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin.

An unprecedented leak of documents shows how this money has made members of Putin’s close circle fabulously wealthy.

Though the president’s name does not appear in any of the records, the data reveals a pattern – his friends have earned millions from deals that seemingly could not have been secured without his patronage.

The documents suggest Putin’s family has benefited from this money – his friends’ fortunes appear his to spend.

The files are part of an unprecedented leak of millions of papers from the database of Mossack Fonseca, the world’s fourth biggest offshore law firm. They show how the rich and powerful are able to exploit secret offshore tax regimes in myriad ways.

Speculation over the size of Putin’s personal fortune has gone on for almost a decade, following reports in 2007 that he was worth at least $40bn, based on leaks from inside his own presidential administration.

The Putin circle’s use of offshore companies contrasts with the president’s call for “deoffshoreisation”, urging Russians to bring cash hidden abroad home. Others who make use of offshore companies include oil trader Gennady Timchenko, Putin’s friend of 30 years. The US imposed sanctions on him in 2014. Others in the data are Arkady and Boris Rotenberg, Putin’s childhood friends and former judo partners. They are now billionaire construction tycoons. The Arsenal FC shareholder Alisher Usmanov also appears. He has at least six companies registered in the Isle of Man. There is no suggestion this is illegal.

Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s official spokesman, declined to comment on specific allegations against the president. Speaking last week, Peskov said western spy agencies were behind an all-out “information attack” against him to destabilise Russia before elections. Peskov dismissed the investigation by the Guardian and others as an “undisguised, paid-for hack job”. He said Russia had “legal means” to defend Putin’s dignity and honour.

http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/panama-papers-money-hidden-offshore

Makes the Clintons look like amateurs
 
A stupid wee post, but I think an important one. Scotland doesn't lead the world in much (these days;)) but the leader of the main opposition (election coming up in May) in Scotland has just come out. Whoopy do you may say, but given 2 out of the other three are also openly Gay, and nobody gives a flying makes me proud in Scottish politics. Unfortunately for them all, it's going to another SNP whitewash...
 
Mar 14, 2016
3,092
7
0
Panama Papers

So the Prime Minister of Iceland (and many others) are involved in tax evasion according to the Panama Papers? No wonder he wanted to go back to business-as-usual casino banking less than 5 years after Iceland's catastrophic meltdown. :rolleyes:
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
Re: Panama Papers

CheckMyPecs said:
So the Prime Minister of Iceland (and many others) are involved in tax evasion according to the Panama Papers? No wonder he wanted to go back to business-as-usual casino banking less than 5 years after Iceland's catastrophic meltdown. :rolleyes:

....and closer to home...

The offshore investment fund run by David Cameron's father avoided paying UK tax, Panama Papers show. The Guardian

....and...maybe....

Yes, Mossack Fonseca may now be history, and its countless uberwealthy clients exposed, but none other than Rothschild is now delighted to be able to fill its rather large shoes. In fact, someone with a conspiratorial bent may decide that today's dramatic takedown of the Panama "offshoring" industry was nothing more than a hit designed to crush the competition of domestic "tax haven" providers... such as Rothschild.

....and more maybe...

As former UK ambassador Craig Murray writes, the beef (if there is any at all) is in what is hidden by the organizations that manage the "leak":

The filtering of this Mossack Fonseca information by the corporate media follows a direct western governmental agenda. There is no mention at all of use of Mossack Fonseca by massive western corporations or western billionaires – the main customers. And the Guardian is quick to reassure that “much of the leaked material will remain private.”
What do you expect? The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists”, which is funded and organised entirely by the USA’s Center for Public Integrity. Their funders include

Ford Foundation
Carnegie Endowment
Rockefeller Family Fund
W K Kellogg Foundation
Open Society Foundation (Soros)

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) is part of the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) which is financed by the U.S. government through USAID.

The "leak" is of data selected by U.S. friendly organization out of a database, likely obtained by U.S. secret services, which can be assumed to include much dirt about "western" persons and organizations.

To only publish very selected data from the "leaked" data has two purposes:
•It smears various "enemies of the empire" even if only by association like the presidents Putin and Assad.
•It lets other important people, those mentioned in the database but not yet published about, know that the U.S. or its "media partner" can, at any time, expose their dirty laundry to the public. It is thereby a perfect blackmailing instrument.

The engineered "leak" of the "Panama Papers" is a limited hangout designed to incriminate a few people and organization the U.S. dislikes. It is also a demonstration of the "torture tools" to the people who did business with Mossak Fonseca but have not (yet) been published about. They are now in the hands of those who control the database. They will have to do as demanded or else ...


...and as MI pointed out in the World Politics thread showed selectively slime people ( if only by association )....though given the apparent scale of this the entire world may in some way be implicated....

Cheers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.