roundabout said:Enviromental?
I would have thought the cost alone would make it a no go.
No, the cost will be backed up by the many investors. Government has nothing to do with it so money would not be the issue.
roundabout said:Enviromental?
I would have thought the cost alone would make it a no go.
TeoSheva said:is it a joke?
Descender said:No, it's been officially annou... oh wait. Yes, it is.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Dutch selection
Road race: Gesink, Boom, Mollema, Tjallingii, Weening, Ligthart, Poels, Hoogerland, Terpstra
Because he's crap? Last year he was included because of his knowledge of the courseEyeballs Out said:How did Koen De Kort not get in ahead of some of those ?
theyoungest said:Because he's crap? Last year he was included because of his knowledge of the course![]()
Yeah, as much as I like those four, I'd only have selected Gesink and, if anything, Poels. Weening I suppose might be alright as a domestique on this course, but there are guys who could do better.Dekker_Tifosi said:On this course, De Kort is worth more than Gesink, Mollema, Weening or Poels to be honoust.
On light rolling/hilly courses he is simply better.
dlwssonic said:What the heck, Freire shouldn't be the leader. He is old and over rated. Rojas deserves it more.
Uhh... could you give me any results that would suggest this? And certainly in a 260+ km race? Sure, Mollema or Gesink aren't specialists for a course like this, but are they necessarily worse than De Kort?Dekker_Tifosi said:On this course, De Kort is worth more than Gesink, Mollema, Weening or Poels to be honoust.
On light rolling/hilly courses he is simply better.
theyoungest said:Uhh... could you give me any results that would suggest this? And certainly in a 260+ km race? Sure, Mollema or Gesink aren't specialists for a course like this, but are they necessarily worse than De Kort?
Dekker_Tifosi said:On this course, De Kort is worth more than Gesink, Mollema, Weening or Poels to be honoust.
On light rolling/hilly courses he is simply better.
l.Harm said:What about Van Hummel/Veelers. They at least have a shot at the end.
theyoungest said:I'm not really a Boom fan either (I get the idea that Boom fans are actually quite scarce?) but having seen him in Roubaix I certainly think that he could eventually play a role.
But contrary to you I have no faith in Ligthart, who could barely outsprint Bram Tankink in the NationalsIf Mollema didn't get cramped up I think he would have beaten Pim.
theyoungest said:Uhh... could you give me any results that would suggest this? And certainly in a 260+ km race? Sure, Mollema or Gesink aren't specialists for a course like this, but are they necessarily worse than De Kort?
Spine Concept said:I highly doubt Mollema could beat Ligthart in a head-to-head sprint. I'm not one to speculate or start an endless debate about what could have happened had Mollema not cramped up at the nationals. To be fair though, Mollema is pretty fast for a mountain goat. I'm not a Ligthart fanboy or anything but he would be considered the fastest out of the Dutch selection hence my choice. If Boom and Ligthart were in the winning break than the former would be more likely to lead out the latter right?
Dekker_Tifosi said:I don't know. Boom is pretty fast when he wants to be. Especially if the sprint starts rather late. Boom has a superb acceleration, but probably lacks in top speed compared to a real sprinter