No, you can't. Anyway, Valverde's problem was his position when Gilbert attacked. He wasn't in a position to go with him (not that he coud have).Panda Claws said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfMVNJgxBZc
0:30 - 0:40 or so you can clearly see Valverde sitting at Phil's wheel.
...
Phil raced for 1st until he knew it was pointless, then raced for 2nd. Valverde did the same. The difference is, Valverde knew he was racing for 2nd sooner. He could have picked up a 2nd much easier, by staying in the group on the Cauberg. That would have been truly saving energy for the final sprint. He simply couldn't go with Gilbert and had trouble getting onto Gerrans wheel.El Pistolero said:Yes, Phil was racing for first. That means catching Kreuziger. Valverde was racing for second, that means saving energy for the final sprint. Phil didn't do that because why would he need a second place?
No, he didn't win because Gilbert was simply better that day.El Pistolero said:Phil was quite a few rows behind at the beginning of the Cauberg. Yet he somehow won. While some of you are using the bad placement argument as a reason why Valverde didn't win.
Orbit501 said:How is it Pais Vasco organisers can get all results up and confirmed almost in an instant yet here we have confused top tens and nothing more nearly an hour after the race has finished.![]()
And that if Valverde had been in Gerrans position, he would have been in the wheel of Gilbert immediately.Parrulo said:from the video it's clear that gilbert was riding away from gerrans and that is why valverde closed the gap himself
LaFlorecita said:The reason why CF is going to win the tour relatively easily is because Alberto is far, far from top form. With both on top form Alberto wins. Top form is for example Tdf 2009 when he got the VAM record
Parrulo said:from the video it's clear that gilbert was riding away from gerrans and that is why valverde closed the gap himself
If Kreuziger had been in the bunch, he wouldn't be able to follow Valverde. Kreuziger was the smartest. Valverde the strongest.El Pistolero said:After wheelsucking yes he closed the small gap. Does that make him the strongest? Nope, Kreuziger was stronger for example.
Anyway, Gilbert said he lost too much energy after the crash, but he also didn't have super legs today, but had a good feeling. Then complimented Kreuziger.
Netserk said:If Kreuziger had been in the bunch, he wouldn't be able to follow Valverde. Kreuziger was the smartest. Valverde the strongest.
Netserk said:If Kreuziger had been in the bunch, he wouldn't be able to follow Valverde. Kreuziger was the smartest. Valverde the strongest.
Stopped by to grab a but.Maaaaaaaarten said:wow couldn't see the race today and I just came back to check the results, Kreuziger... didn't expect that!
Nice for Saxo to get some points though!
I had to leave just as Weening was in the attack, how far did his attack reach? because I see he still made it into the top 10! Also, what happened to Sagan?
El Pistolero said:After wheelsucking yes he closed the small gap. Does that make him the strongest?
argyllflyer said:Perhaps why henao didn't win:
http://instagram.com/p/YF0JgVQvrp/
From Uran, with the message: 2 falls but still top 10!
argyllflyer said:Perhaps why henao didn't win:
http://instagram.com/p/YF0JgVQvrp/
From Uran, with the message: 2 falls but still top 10!
The Hitch said:Really happy to see Roman pull that off.
According to you doesnt that make him "the smartest"? I mean when the very same Gerrans wheelsucked Cancellara for far longer, according to you that was brilliant tactics from Gerrans. So Valverde was also doing brilliant tactics today no?
LaFlorecita said:The reason why CF is going to win the tour relatively easily is because Alberto is far, far from top form. With both on top form Alberto wins. Top form is for example Tdf 2009 when he got the VAM record