- Feb 15, 2011
- 2,886
- 2
- 0
BillytheKid said:His TT position is really bad though...losing a lot of time on that. I'm confused why so many riders do not improve what is obvious.![]()
Cause it doesn't feel right to them and they lose some of their power?
BillytheKid said:His TT position is really bad though...losing a lot of time on that. I'm confused why so many riders do not improve what is obvious.![]()
BillytheKid said:His TT position is really bad though...losing a lot of time on that. I'm confused why so many riders do not improve what is obvious.![]()
Dekker_Tifosi said:It's not that easy to stay in a 'perfect' TT position. Many riders will automatically assume a possition that's more comfortable for them but less aerodynamic.
DJ Sprtsch said:Ha ha, wonder if they are going to show Evans or just Pinotti all the way?
Highlander said:I agree. He looked really fast out on the course that I definitely thought that he was going to beat Bennati's time. I didn't see any splits, so I was just basing this on how he looked on the road.
Parrulo said:why should he improve his position? he will never need his itt anyway as he doesn't race for GC on 1 week races nor GT's
how long till nibali departures?
BillytheKid said:His TT position is really bad though...losing a lot of time on that. I'm confused why so many riders do not improve what is obvious.![]()
Ryo Hazuki said:because chancing your position to more aerodyanmic doesn't mean you will go faster. it has to do with how much power you can oputput in a certain position. great examples are rujano and thomas dekker that ride in a natural aerodynamic position which partly makes them so strong. *** they have the best possible power output while have like the best possible aerodynamic position
Parrulo said:exactly, levi is the extreme opposite with a nearly perfect position and not so much power because he is just tiny
Parrulo said:exactly, levi is the extreme opposite with a nearly perfect position and not so much power because he is just tiny
Ryo Hazuki said:levi's position is heavily trained and not natural. so he definitely gave up power to ride in that position and all weighing it is probably best for him by some output. but certain riders like a thomas dekker or rujano that are in natural aerodynamic position without ever having trained it or been in windtunnels when young. their most efficient and powerful way of riding just happens to be also very aerodynamical. I hope you understand what I said
some riders like andy schleck, or basso are the total opposite. very good power output in in very bad aerodynamic position
Her's the time for the winner of T-A:Parrulo said:how long till nibali departures?
Tour of Poland??Parrulo said:why should he improve his position? he will never need his itt anyway as he doesn't race for GC on 1 week races nor GT's
how long till nibali departures?
Lexman said:Djezus : Evans rode 11'20"???
Highlander said:I didn't see Evans cross the line, but the shots on the road weren't very encouraging. His pedal stroke looked very labored and it looked like he was pedaling squares at times.
cineteq said:Her's the time for the winner of T-A:
138 POELS Wouter VCD 15,32'00
139 POZZOVIVO Domenico COG 15,34'00
140 DI LUCA Danilo ASA 15,36'00
141 RIBLON Christophe ALM 15,38'00
142 RODRIGUEZ OLIVER Joaquin KAT 15,40'00
143 HOOGERLAND Johnny VCD 15,42'00
144 SCARPONI Michele LAM 15,44'00
145 NOCENTINI Rinaldo ALM 15,46'00
146 NIBALI Vincenzo LIQ 15,48'00
147 KREUZIGER Roman AST 15,50'00
148 HORNER Christopher RNT 15,52'00
Ryo Hazuki said:because chancing your position to more aerodyanmic doesn't mean you will go faster. it has to do with how much power you can oputput in a certain position. great examples are rujano and thomas dekker that ride in a natural aerodynamic position which partly makes them so strong. *** they have the best possible power output while have like the best possible aerodynamic position
