willbick said:And in romandie froome (and spilak) beat the climber group by a minute. Please tell me where these 'huge gaps' have been
a minute is a huge gap.
willbick said:And in romandie froome (and spilak) beat the climber group by a minute. Please tell me where these 'huge gaps' have been
He did. So, if he went all out earlier, how much would he have gained?willbick said:Yes. He won comfortably
willbick said:Yes. He won comfortably. And he will win le tour comfortably barring crash or illness
Eshnar said:How can you see the AC fans and not notice the Sky fans?![]()
LaFlorecita said:a minute is a huge gap.
I'm not a Sky fan either. But here there are a lot of posters. Not only 3.airstream said:Tank91 reasons quite rationally. I wouldn't call this pro sky bias. DT is obviously not a sky fan. so is the hitch
airstream said:Tank91 reasons quite rationally. I wouldn't call this pro sky bias. DT is obviously not a sky fan. so is the hitch
you know what, the huge gaps of the bad old dirty days were often caused by that too. Perhaps more, since back then teams were less dominant and leaders used to be all alone earlier.willbick said:I seem to recall most of that minute was gained on the flat section when valverde et al were looking at each other and soft peddling
The Hitch said:Who said that?
It was obviously before the vuelta that froome would struggle cos he had just done the tour and it wasn't even a major season aim for him. Here on the other hand froome has based his entire season around the tour.
willbick said:Yes. He won comfortably. And he will win le tour comfortably barring crash or illness
willbick said:Anyone who counters the anti-sky hysteria with some boring facts is immediately labelled a 'skyboy' or somesuch
Eshnar said:you know what, the huge gaps of the bad old dirty days were often caused by that too. Perhaps more, since back then teams were less dominant and leaders used to be all alone earlier.
Because he looks to be trolling this forum since, lets say, almost a year ago? When Andy fell on his behind that is.Eshnar said:How can you see the AC fans and not notice the Sky fans?![]()
well that's what I meant.Dazed and Confused said:today until the final two kms, we have three Sky guys, followed by three Saxo boys followed by two Cofidis blokes. And if Movistar played along nicely they would have been three as well.
No wonder these stages ends in a sprint to the line.
Sophistic82 said:every time contador cant drop froome is a loss, froome is 7-8kg heavier and knows how to sit on a tt bike, froome is gonna win the gts andy gave away with his laziness.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Because he looks to be trolling this forum since, lets say, almost a year ago? When Andy fell on his behind that is.
LaFleur said:Not sure I agree with this "the win was comfortable" talk. If he was clearly better than others and could've won by much more than 4 seconds, he would've.
Lanark said:Why? The GC-win is confortable at this moment, he did what he had to do to win the stage, it would be a waste of energy to try anything grandiose.
LaFleur said:Not sure I agree with this "the win was comfortable" talk. If he was clearly better than others and could've won by much more than 4 seconds, he would've.
LaFleur said:Attacking from maybe 2-3km before the finish is hardly grandiose.
Lanark said:Why? The GC-win is confortable at this moment, he did what he had to do to win the stage, it would be a waste of energy to try anything grandiose.
LaFleur said:Attacking from maybe 2-3km before the finish is hardly grandiose.