Samu is also a big loser since he's really riding into form and had a good chance to win this stage and climb into top5 on GC.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
DJ Sprtsch said:Any rumours on how they will go about tomorrow?
Weather could be even worse. Major bummer.
Linkinito said:Those stages weren't cancelled, they were neutralized. Like after Weylandt's death in 2011. They were ridden fully but no attacks, no results.
giro 2004 totally unbeatable. this year edition had weather excuses at leastairstream said:Giro 13 is the worst GT within my 10 year recollection
Cimber said:This is a picture from tomorrow's MTF:
https://twitter.com/Sander_Slager/status/337851721025978368/photo/1
Lexman said:Gesink abandons the Giro without riding today, ...
Cimber said:He should have stayed and see what will happen tomorrow. Afterall they might only have the finishing flat stage on sunday left.
Pulpstar said:Why has Gesink abandoned ?! More than likely he'll just have to ride the processionary last stage anyway - Its like abandoning a degree course after taking the final exams or some such
Lexman said:Gesink abandons the Giro without riding today, ...
Pulpstar said:Why has Gesink abandoned ?! More than likely he'll just have to ride the processionary last stage anyway - Its like abandoning a degree course after taking the final exams or some such
Lexman said:
stetre76 said:why don't you just stop trolling around - my guess, you've never seen snow in your life or ridden a bike downhill when it's snowing, right?
Probably at the Blanco offices the news of the stage cancellation hadn't reached them yet. You think I'm joking, but it's Blanco we're talking about.Pulpstar said:Indeed it makes no sense. He can always abandon at the start tommorow if there is a stage that actually takes place.
Ryongsyong said:Actually I have, and if you don't believe me then that's okay because professional and amateur cyclists have been photographed and filmed doing exactly that for the last 100 years. They'd be a bit annoyed to have gone through all that struggle only for someone to think that what they've done is so impossible it must be a troll. They'll all tell you the same— no one's ever forcing anyone to go down at a speed that's dangerous. You don't get points or prizes for that. This is an organic race around a country using a bicycle, and the winner is the person that is able to overcome the conditions in the quickest time, which is a different thing to the highest speed. If such an escapade is only possible at 10km/h, or by getting off and walking for a bit, then that's how it is and how it always was. All the stories people talk about the past are of exactly that. If you want a sport with no more interesting stories of man and machine overcoming the elements, then good for you, but I'm telling you that once it's established that they will no longer cycle when it's snowing then next they'll start neutralising descents when it's heavy rain, and then curtailing or rerouting stages when it's raining badly, and then cancelling them altogether.
The whole point of professional bike racing used to be to show the bicycle to be this apparently unstoppable force, able to get the rider through whatever was thrown at it, where-ever that may be, immune to all the forces brought before it. That's how it's been for 100 years, and if it's quietly been decided that that's no longer the case, I wish they'd tell us properly so it's out in the open because it signifies a fundamental change in mindset and image for the sport. And if this is a new 'era', then I'm happy to stick with my 100+ year old one actually, but depressed about the future ...
Ryongsyong said:Actually I have, and if you don't believe me then that's okay because professional and amateur cyclists have been photographed and filmed doing exactly that for the last 100 years. They'd be a bit annoyed to have gone through all that struggle only for someone to think that what they've done is so impossible it must be a troll. They'll all tell you the same— no one's ever forcing anyone to go down at a speed that's dangerous. You don't get points or prizes for that. This is an organic race around a country using a bicycle, and the winner is the person that is able to overcome the conditions in the quickest time, which is a different thing to the highest speed. If such an escapade is only possible at 10km/h, or by getting off and walking for a bit, then that's how it is and how it always was. All the stories people talk about the past are of exactly that. If you want a sport with no more interesting stories of man and machine overcoming the elements, then good for you, but I'm telling you that once it's established that they will no longer cycle when it's snowing then next they'll start neutralising descents when it's heavy rain, and then curtailing or rerouting stages when it's raining badly, and then cancelling them altogether.
The whole point of professional bike racing used to be to show the bicycle to be this apparently unstoppable force, able to get the rider through whatever was thrown at it, where-ever that may be, immune to all the forces brought before it. That's how it's been for 100 years, and if it's quietly been decided that that's no longer the case, I wish they'd tell us properly so it's out in the open because it signifies a fundamental change in mindset and image for the sport. And if this is a new 'era', then I'm happy to stick with my 100+ year old one actually, but depressed about the future ...
Ryongsyong said:Actually I have, and if you don't believe me then that's okay because professional and amateur cyclists have been photographed and filmed doing exactly that for the last 100 years. They'd be a bit annoyed to have gone through all that struggle only for someone to think that what they've done is so impossible it must be a troll. They'll all tell you the same— no one's ever forcing anyone to go down at a speed that's dangerous. You don't get points or prizes for that. This is an organic race around a country using a bicycle, and the winner is the person that is able to overcome the conditions in the quickest time, which is a different thing to the highest speed. If such an escapade is only possible at 10km/h, or by getting off and walking for a bit, then that's how it is and how it always was. All the stories people talk about the past are of exactly that. If you want a sport with no more interesting stories of man and machine overcoming the elements, then good for you, but I'm telling you that once it's established that they will no longer cycle when it's snowing then next they'll start neutralising descents when it's heavy rain, and then curtailing or rerouting stages when it's raining badly, and then cancelling them altogether.
The whole point of professional bike racing used to be to show the bicycle to be this apparently unstoppable force, able to get the rider through whatever was thrown at it, where-ever that may be, immune to all the forces brought before it. That's how it's been for 100 years, and if it's quietly been decided that that's no longer the case, I wish they'd tell us properly so it's out in the open because it signifies a fundamental change in mindset and image for the sport. And if this is a new 'era', then I'm happy to stick with my 100+ year old one actually, but depressed about the future ...
TANK91 said:You talk Sh*t, it's - 15 plus on the Stelvio so when they descend it will be catastrophic. The thing that amazes me is you say they should go slow, are you for real? they cant even ride a steep descend in this weather you fool. This weather is the most extreme for years.
Sleimas said:Biathlon races is usually questionable when temperature drops below minus 20 degrees. And biathletes go slower, have winter clothes and races for a shorter period of time. Competitive cycling in -15 would result in frost bites for the whole peleton and possibly amputated fingers.