murali said:
I am only complaining because i am still stuck at 26. To think that i chucked Uran and took henao, and Meersman instead of roche--i am toally devastated by my absurd choices.
Did i make some monumental mistake in the choices?
(this is my first time with a game like this.)
the team i sent at last was:
191 HENAO MONTOYA Sergio Luis SKY 1371
33 FUGLSANG Jakob AST 755
164 MEERSMAN Gianni OPQ 701
163 FENN Andrew OPQ 243
21 ARNDT Nikias ARG 171
132 ANACONA GOMEZ Winner Andrew LAM 103
64 FERRARI BARCELO Fabricio CJR 64
106 PINEAU Cédric FDJ 64
62 ARAMENDIA LLORENTE Francisco Javier CJR 28
my first attempt was
KREUZIGER Roman TST 1023
MEERSMAN Gianni OPQ 669
BOS Theo BLA 467
ROCHE Nicolas TST 442
CLARKE Simon OGE 368
DE GENDT Thomas VCD 246
MARTINEZ DE ESTEBAN Egoi EUS 110
ANACONA GOMEZ Winner Andrew LAM 103
ARAMENDIA LLORENTE Francisco Javier CJR 28
I don’t think you messed up!
Obviously, Henao has not lived up to expectation so far. In normal circumstances, he is one of the punchiest climbers in the world. I am still optimistic - There are bundles of stages suited to his exact characteristics.
Fuglsang had a demanding build-up + very draining Tour. Mentally I think he is spent. Anyway, Astana = all for Nibali. At that prince-range you could have gotten a better alternative in my opinion.
Meersman got that killer-instinct. He might come through on a stage or two. However, his price-tag was rather heavy. I never considered him.
With 12 uphill finishes of various degree I was not very interested in fast-men in general. Therefore, not keen on Andrew Fenn either.
However, Arndt might be interesting. Got speed and arrived in Spain with moral high after his victory in Norway.
Anacona was always going to be risky. Hardly any race-days after his injury.
F.Ferrari, C. Pineau and Aramendia well!!! TV-time.
Roche of course already delivered. He always races well at the Vuelta. + His finishing punch is an asset on several of those hill-top finishes. Good pick in this game.