SeriousSam said:
Perhaps I'm missing the context as I don't know what the stage in 98 looked like and how it was ridden, but those numbers say the (top15 of the) 2014 peloton is quicker (mean 24s, median 43s)). Pantani, Tonkov and to a lesser extent Guerini are much quicker but the rest isn't.
Of course there is no context, the only people who compare single day climbing times without context are trying to push a certain agenda as always.
As I pointed out already, the 98 stage was the last mountain stage of the Giro and was the third of 3 tough mountain stages in a row. The day before they finished at Alpe Di Pampeago and the day before was the queen mountain stage. Roundabout tried to make a comparison by saying they had a TT a few days before this year but didn't mention that they also had a TT just before those mountain stages started in 98 so in the 4 days preceding the 98 Montecampione stage, they had a TT, two mountain stages and an intermediate stage as well as another TT 2 days later.
Also in 98, there was two cols before the final climb, a minor one but then a major one just before the final ascent. So what do you think, are we comparing like with like and Pantani still smashed current times by almost 4 minutes. Also as pointed out by Roundabout, you had an absolute nobody Secchiari riding the same time as the rider currently rated as the best modern day climber even if he is not on top form.
Just to add more context, the ascent times for Alpe d'Huez in 1991 are still plentiful in the top 100 times for that climb. Why is this? Were they all on EPO? Was it a tailwind or was it the fact that particular stage only included one climb before reaching the Alpe and that was the relatively minor Col d'Ornon.
Context is everything when comparing one stage to another, looking at overall trends is however different.