Hugo87 said:Didn't saw the race, but I'm kinda disappointed since Purito, Betancur and Costa couldn't do anything.
At least 5th place from Pozzovivo was impressive, didn't see that coming, plus Machado 17th place in his first LBL![]()
Most of the hate in this thread is not towards Gerrans himself but for the conservative approach of the other riders that allowed him to take a deserving win in a very bad edition of LBLCookster15 said:Wow, just read the results and reports. Awesome effort by Gerrans. Made best use of his talents against superior on paper competition. A great example of what makes road racing so unpredictable. If we wanted the strongest to always win we'd ban bunch riding and conduct TTs only. Now we'd all quickly lose interest if that was the case.
Everyone should just think what would you do if in Gerrans and OGE's situation? Lose just to please some fans? He and Greenedge have done great, just as they did at MSR. Gerrans is a great opportunist and tactician. Perhaps other riders such as Valverde should not have underestimated Gerrans and been ready to counter his tactics?
Last night it crossed my mind fleetingly - what about Gerrans, nobody is picking him and he's been strong since TDU ? Should have gone with my fleeting instincts!
Now I am sure Simon might be thinking about Valverde - you can have Willunga Hill because I'm taking LBL!![]()
Zinoviev Letter said:There were a lot of team leaders in that big group who cannot reasonably have anticipated punching away in the last km nor winning a sprint. You have to wonder what their actual plan to win. A Martin (or a Purito etc) can legitimately think that they are going to burn everyone in the last km. A Gerrans or Valverde can legitimately back themselves in a sprint. What about the rest of you lads? How were you planning to win?
Dekker_Tifosi said:Well Gilbert said the teams have become stronger and it's very very hard to even get a gap, let stand stay away. Most of the others you are referring to are able to follow but cannot attack, or can only attack, gain 5 meters, and then drop like a stone.
Unfortunately the peloton has become too strong.
Arredondo said:I'm disliking Valverde because he can do way more. He is capable to drop Gerrans on Saint Nicolas, but he doesn't dare. That annoys me.
Gerrans however, was on his max the entire race. So the only way to win LBL is to wait for the sprint. He did it just perfect. So i can appreciate that more.
Not entirely true, go back and look at his career pre-2010. Gerrans was actually a very decent stage hunter and attacker. His early Ardennes showings were quite strong with a fair amount of attacking, such as his 06 Liege cameo and his first three GT stages all came from intelligent breakaway riding.Libertine Seguros said:And look at how happy people were about Valverde winning Flèche. Also bear in mind Flèche IS a sprint. Always. So people aren't that upset about conservative racing that means we end up with a bunch ready to sprint up the Mur de Huy together.
Gerrans is a negative racer who has never really displayed any kind of personality for people to get behind. Should he change? Hell no. As long as the opposition are playing into his hands of course he shouldn't be wasting his energy doing entertaining things. After all he has two monument wins and quite a few others despite not having done a single memorable thing since San Luca five years ago. But because of that it's not surprising that him winning is extremely unpopular, and races he wins tend to go down as forgettable affairs.
greenedge said:Gerrans!!!
But seriously i think he has a chance.
Dekker_Tifosi said:well a guy like Weening could have gone in the attack with Pozzo and co, instead he works for Gerrans.
A guy like Sanchez is capable of riding top 10 here. Instead he closes gaps for Gilbert.
See my point?
Nobody's blaming Gerrans, just that the race was so boring and disappointing that it lead to circumstances where Gerrans winning was almost guaranteed.greenedge said:With all the Gerrans annoyance earlier, sure he didn't race exciting but he won (everyone knows he has a fast sprint) based on his talent- if it was raced harder he would have got his usual top 10 (3-4 times now) probably, though his form seems very good so maybe not.
Zinoviev Letter said:I just find myself wondering what is going through the heads of riders and directors. Ok, so we make sure that we arrive at the flamme rouge with both our leader and best helper with the favourites... And then the team leader is going to out punch the guys who just set the fastest and second fastest times ever up the Mur four days ago. Or beat a Milan San Remo winner in the sprint. What could go wrong with this brilliant plan?
Astana was working for sprint - Gasparotto.karlboss said:More or less.
But Gilbert, Valverde, Kwiatkowski, Gerrans, Martin, Moreno...should all be more or less working for a sprint. Turn that around and you are looking at some very powerful teams working for a sprint. So we see Giant, AG2R and TFR attacked, and even Katusha once Rodriguez was out, but their riders just weren't strong enough against an armada working for a sprint.
I think those not working for a sprint Astana and Saxo primarily, should have drilled it from about 90km to go to 40km to go, aiming for a group of definitely less than 20 to top la redoute in contention. Then at worst you end up losing a sprint of fewer riders.
More than anything else this race reminded me of the 2011 Worlds. You could only be happy with it if you supported the winner as a spectacle it offered very little.