Gilbert has always had the class ...just for a long time he did not have the hunger ...simples
Its amasing what you can do when in the last chance saloon
Its amasing what you can do when in the last chance saloon
SKSemtex said:Does anybody hava the ascent times for Paterberg?
GreasyChain said:GuyIncognito said:jsem94 said:Sagan went too close to the barriers... Sad that it had to end like this but take nothing away from Gilberts ride
Yep. They keep trying to avoid the cobbles by riding on guttrs and whatnot. Eventually they (Sagan in particular) hit a barrier. Unfortunate but only himself to blame
The barrier was being pushed over by spectators. Plenty of room otherwise. No fault to The Sag.
The Muur needs to stay. It's as important as Koppenberg for the race. Another signature climb.Põhja Konn said:Amazing, amazing race and even more amazing victory. Gilbert genuinely looks as strong, if not stronger than 2011. He is a different type of rider now, so it's not that easy to compare those two vintages.
The Muur didd after all, make the difference. It effectively played the role the Arenberg trench does in Roubaix - unofficial startpoint of a decisive part of the race.
Way better than the Koppenberg for me. Sure, the Koppenberg is really steep and has horrible cobbles - but it's only a few hundred metres long. The Muur is 2km - and gradually builds up to a great crescendo near the capella. Whatever race it's in - even some minor events like de Panne or Eneco Tour, it guarantees great action.Velolover2 said:The Muur needs to stay. It's as important as Koppenberg for the race. Another signature climb.Põhja Konn said:Amazing, amazing race and even more amazing victory. Gilbert genuinely looks as strong, if not stronger than 2011. He is a different type of rider now, so it's not that easy to compare those two vintages.
The Muur didd after all, make the difference. It effectively played the role the Arenberg trench does in Roubaix - unofficial startpoint of a decisive part of the race.
DFA123 said:they still finished 1st and 3rd.
Sure, from Terpstra's point of view it wasn't exactly a heroic podium effort. But from Quickstep as a whole, it's a great overall result from some pretty bold tactical moves.DirtyWorks said:DFA123 said:they still finished 1st and 3rd.
I don't know anything about Terpstra, but, being towed all the way in by GvA and then losing the sprint isn't good. Maybe he's more "engine" than sprinter.
DirtyWorks said:DFA123 said:they still finished 1st and 3rd.
I don't know anything about Terpstra, but, being towed all the way in by GvA and then losing the sprint isn't good. Maybe he's more "engine" than sprinter.
rhubroma said:What a wacky race. Sagan and GVA skrewed up royally in being placed too far back when Boonen forced the pace to open a gap. At that point QS had all the cards stacked in their favor, played the Phil one way earlier than would have been otherwise possible, who then held off the chase because Sagan rode too close to the barrier. Before barriergate, however, Boonen was KO due to a second mechanical after a bike change. It would have been interesting to see whether Boonen would been able to mark Sagan and GVA to then beat them (the second QS card) in the sprint after they caught Phil, had they not gone down as was the case. The variables are mind boggling, because Phil was impressive, but QS would have never played his card that soon had Sagan and GVA not been caught sleeping, and so he would have been a lot fresher for the finish to be able to win the race in any case. Had he, that is, not won it the way he did. What a wacky race.
This. Most impressive ride I have seen in long time.deValtos said:With Sagan they'd probably have caught him but I don't think that should take anything away from Gilberts win since I'm pretty confident he was the strongest rider on the day. He was riding on the front of the peolton at 100km to go protecting Boonen which already caused a page of replies on this threadHe then did some big turns for 40km in a group before a 60km solo attack ... so yea
That's harsh. As much as I'm reluctant to give sky credit; they were important in establishing the decisive break and then Rowe got taken down because Vanmarcke tried to ride along a huge crack in the middle of the road.portugal11 said:So when it comes to unpredictable races, skyborgs are nowhere to be seen
Stop it with the baseless Sky hate. They made the move on the Muur with two riders and then one was taken out. Moscon wasn't able to follow Gilbert (not surprising) and then that group was absorbed. Moscon had worked quite a bit for Rowe before the crash, so he wasn't able to follow Felline/Van Baarle or Sagan/GvA so remained in the third group. Finished 15th so wasn't an awful effort by a 22 year old.portugal11 said:So when it comes to unpredictable races, skyborgs are nowhere to be seen
portugal11 said:So when it comes to unpredictable races, skyborgs are nowhere to be seen
DirtyWorks said:rhubroma said:What a wacky race. Sagan and GVA skrewed up royally in being placed too far back when Boonen forced the pace to open a gap. At that point QS had all the cards stacked in their favor, played the Phil one way earlier than would have been otherwise possible, who then held off the chase because Sagan rode too close to the barrier. Before barriergate, however, Boonen was KO due to a second mechanical after a bike change. It would have been interesting to see whether Boonen would been able to mark Sagan and GVA to then beat them (the second QS card) in the sprint after they caught Phil, had they not gone down as was the case. The variables are mind boggling, because Phil was impressive, but QS would have never played his card that soon had Sagan and GVA not been caught sleeping, and so he would have been a lot fresher for the finish to be able to win the race in any case. Had he, that is, not won it the way he did. What a wacky race.
Every year they have the depth to do this kind of racing and most years it doesn't work out at all. This year all of it worked.
Had Sagan not fallen, I think the run into the finish would have been closer with Sagan on the podium. Would Sagan have been enough to close on Gilbert? Who knows! I doubt it though.
A huge result for van Baarle. 24 years old!
rhubroma said:Then, as you said, "it all worked," though ironically not for Boonen!
Yes, he was. No doubt in my mind the second group would have caught PG within the last 4k, with Sagan's help but without it they were toast.DirtyWorks said:rhubroma said:Then, as you said, "it all worked," though ironically not for Boonen!
Yes. One of the reasons I like bike racing. There is such an element of luck. Equipment has to work perfectly, even for Boonen.
There's no way to know what a 2nd group with Sagan would have done. He was absolutely destroying his group before the crash.
DirtyWorks said:rhubroma said:Then, as you said, "it all worked," though ironically not for Boonen!
Yes. One of the reasons I like bike racing. There is such an element of luck. Equipment has to work perfectly, even for Boonen.
There's no way to know what a 2nd group with Sagan would have done. He was absolutely destroying his group before the crash.
Nope. The GPS was clearly wrong, seeing as Gilbert still had 29 seconds at the finish line.rhubroma said:DirtyWorks said:rhubroma said:What a wacky race. Sagan and GVA skrewed up royally in being placed too far back when Boonen forced the pace to open a gap. At that point QS had all the cards stacked in their favor, played the Phil one way earlier than would have been otherwise possible, who then held off the chase because Sagan rode too close to the barrier. Before barriergate, however, Boonen was KO due to a second mechanical after a bike change. It would have been interesting to see whether Boonen would been able to mark Sagan and GVA to then beat them (the second QS card) in the sprint after they caught Phil, had they not gone down as was the case. The variables are mind boggling, because Phil was impressive, but QS would have never played his card that soon had Sagan and GVA not been caught sleeping, and so he would have been a lot fresher for the finish to be able to win the race in any case. Had he, that is, not won it the way he did. What a wacky race.
Every year they have the depth to do this kind of racing and most years it doesn't work out at all. This year all of it worked.
Had Sagan not fallen, I think the run into the finish would have been closer with Sagan on the podium. Would Sagan have been enough to close on Gilbert? Who knows! I doubt it though.
A huge result for van Baarle. 24 years old!
Ahh, I disagree about Sagan and GVA not catching Phil though. The crash perhaps cost GVA 10-12 seconds AND no Sagan for the chase. Now at 5k out the gap to Phil was what 30 seconds circa.
No way Sagan could have helped close 30+ seconds in the situation that would have developed. He would have basically just taken the place of Van Baarle, who was dropped at the point of the crash - as was Terpstra. Naessen, had he somehow managed to hang on the Paterberg, probably could have only contributed as much as Teprstra. So Sagan would have had to close 30 seconds more than Van Baarle managed to; possibly with GVA also holding a little more back than he did? No chance.Irondan said:Yes, he was. No doubt in my mind the second group would have caught PG within the last 4k, with Sagan's help but without it they were toast.DirtyWorks said:rhubroma said:Then, as you said, "it all worked," though ironically not for Boonen!
Yes. One of the reasons I like bike racing. There is such an element of luck. Equipment has to work perfectly, even for Boonen.
There's no way to know what a 2nd group with Sagan would have done. He was absolutely destroying his group before the crash.