2017 Tour of Flanders / Ronde Van Vlaanderen - April 2, 260k

Page 42 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

So, who wins?

  • Démare

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Lotto Soudal

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Kristoff

    Votes: 3 2.0%
  • Sagan

    Votes: 64 42.7%
  • Degenkolb

    Votes: 5 3.3%
  • Van Avermaet

    Votes: 33 22.0%
  • Durbridge

    Votes: 4 2.7%
  • Gilbert

    Votes: 22 14.7%
  • Quickstep other than Gilbert

    Votes: 6 4.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 11 7.3%

  • Total voters
    150
  • Poll closed .
Re:

Escarabajo said:
Nice race. Great win for Gilbert.

With Sagan in there it would have been close. It was a headwind so one more body pulling could have made the difference. But it was his own wrongdoing anyway.

There will be no one more body. If Sagan didn't crash he/GVA/Naesen would have rode till the finish but in this case Van Baarle and Terpstra wouldn't be with them. And also, in this case, there will be no one to lunch them on Paterberg like that idiot did.
Looking at the final gap I still think Phil would've won.
 
Mar 15, 2016
520
0
0
Re: Re:

saganftw said:
trucido said:
saganftw said:
stop with this crashing BS, vanmarcke is down every other day and took rowe with him today as well...stuff happens, if its karma then poor Sep must have been an absolutely horrible human being in his previous life

Tell that to half of the Bahrain team today.

that one taiwanese guy who crashed like twice...really suspicious :lol:

One of them was also into the back of his stationary teamate. :lol:
 
Re: Re:

Flamin said:
Irondan said:
Flamin said:
Irondan said:
Flamin said:
That's simply not true at all.
Yes it is. I don't know how you can't see that.

So Gilbert was this strong in the past 5 years? Please. I've seen races where Greg led out Gilbert in a sprint and still finished in front of him.
Gilbert wasn't allowed by his team to ride these races in the last five years, but before he went to BMC Gilbert podiumed this race twice, and has now won it. There's more results but I don't have time to do any research at the moment but will gladly revisit this conversation at a later time.

Gilbert rode races like Omloop and E3 multiple times with BMC. He just sucked. Yes, let's continue this in the Gilbert thread...
Because Gilbert was aiming for the Ardennes, GVA was leader for BMC at the cobbled races.
 
Re: Re:

pink_jersey said:
Escarabajo said:
Nice race. Great win for Gilbert.

With Sagan in there it would have been close. It was a headwind so one more body pulling could have made the difference. But it was his own wrongdoing anyway.

There will be no one more body. If Sagan didn't crash he/GVA/Naesen would have rode till the finish but in this case Van Baarle and Terpstra wouldn't be with them. And also, in this case, there will be no one to lunch them on Paterberg like that idiot did.
Looking at the final gap I still think Phil would've won.
Exactly. The dynamics change completely. With Sagan there, Terpstra doesn't pull at all (even if he somehow manages to bridge across), Van Baarle doesn't get back on, and GVA and Naesen also save something back for the sprint.

Also, Gilbert probably digs slightly deeper and doesn't give up 10 seconds celebrating in the final km.
 
C8ayR3JXgAA49tz.jpg
 
Mar 14, 2009
3,436
0
0
Not to take it away from Phil, but the million dollar question is:

Would Phil have won without the "support" of the motorbikes and his team car that was sheltering him from the win on multiple occasions?

Just a few pictures for you to decide


17634377_1674700479213366_1931215156267552561_n.jpg


17630058_1674700645880016_4521405546997663278_n.jpg


17626666_1674701615879919_1246034470891593496_n.jpg



So how close are these TV cameras in front of him?

17759989_1674700032546744_6748125046053849182_n.jpg


17626638_1674700319213382_6533149902733760371_n.jpg
 
Jul 6, 2016
30
0
0
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
pink_jersey said:
Escarabajo said:
Nice race. Great win for Gilbert.

With Sagan in there it would have been close. It was a headwind so one more body pulling could have made the difference. But it was his own wrongdoing anyway.

There will be no one more body. If Sagan didn't crash he/GVA/Naesen would have rode till the finish but in this case Van Baarle and Terpstra wouldn't be with them. And also, in this case, there will be no one to lunch them on Paterberg like that idiot did.
Looking at the final gap I still think Phil would've won.
Exactly. The dynamics change completely. With Sagan there, Terpstra doesn't pull at all (even if he somehow manages to bridge across), Van Baarle doesn't get back on, and GVA and Naesen also save something back for the sprint.

Also, Gilbert probably digs slightly deeper and doesn't give up 10 seconds celebrating in the final km.

Not sure about the last point. The second group clearly stopped riding as well, I mean, Terpstra even ended up on the front! (Like an idiot)
 
Re: 2017 Tour of Flanders / Ronde Van Vlaanderen - April 2,

SKSemtex said:
Gilbert was mediocre rider last five year. Cobbles or asphalt.
He is back. Let's enjoy.
Absolutely! I tipped Sagan as well, but it's quite sad if you can't enjoy and celebrate an incredible win like that as a cycling fan, even if you mostly support another rider.
 
Re: Re:

LaFlorecita said:
PremierAndrew said:
El Pistolero said:
PremierAndrew said:
El Pistolero said:
Philippe Gilbert, by far the best classics specialist of his generation: Ronde van Vlaanderen, Liège-Bastogne-Liège, Giro di Lombardia (twice) and the World Championships.

Ronde van Vlaanderen when the favourite crashes out, Liege-Bastogne-Liege in the absence of the best ardennes specialist of his era, Valverde

Someone had to do a pistolero :lol:

Can't crash if no one is in front of you.

Tell that to Sagan and Vanmarcke
And the hundreds of other riders who have crashed on descents or in corners in the history of cycling ... :eek:
Uphill too! Menchov, the legend.
 
Re: Re:

ice&fire said:
TromleTromle said:
Also remember. The MAGIC of the MUUR is back.

Epic win for a legend!

The steppers must have read this before the race
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/van-avermaet-the-muur-doesnt-fit-in-the-new-tour-of-flanders-parcours/
They get a lot of criticism at times, but they played that really well today. That ambush on the Muur was very nice and very well executed - I don't think anyone thought that Gilbert would go so early.

And even though they got a bit unlucky with Boonen - who was probably in position to just mark Sagan and GVA - they still finished 1st and 3rd. Great tactics and, on this form, Boonen may still have his dream finale next weekend.
 
Aug 17, 2016
56
0
0
Re: Re:

GuyIncognito said:
jsem94 said:
Sagan went too close to the barriers... Sad that it had to end like this but take nothing away from Gilberts ride

Yep. They keep trying to avoid the cobbles by riding on guttrs and whatnot. Eventually they (Sagan in particular) hit a barrier. Unfortunate but only himself to blame

The barrier was being pushed over by spectators. Plenty of room otherwise. No fault to The Sag.
 
Apr 1, 2013
426
0
0
now to the most pivotal question:
did Phil ride more km's on his own than Carlos Betancur in the group before he did throw in the sponge?
 
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
ice&fire said:
TromleTromle said:
Also remember. The MAGIC of the MUUR is back.

Epic win for a legend!

The steppers must have read this before the race
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/van-avermaet-the-muur-doesnt-fit-in-the-new-tour-of-flanders-parcours/
They get a lot of criticism at times, but they played that really well today. That ambush on the Muur was very nice and very well executed - I don't think anyone thought that Gilbert would go so early.

And even though they got a bit unlucky with Boonen - who was probably in position to just mark Sagan and GVA - they still finished 1st and 3rd. Great tactics and, on this form, Boonen may still have his dream finale next weekend.
QuickStep is much more different when there are bosses like Phil or Tom. :cool:
When those two are not there, QS manages to mess it up and fail absimally.
 
Re: Re:

Forever The Best said:
DFA123 said:
ice&fire said:
TromleTromle said:
Also remember. The MAGIC of the MUUR is back.

Epic win for a legend!

The steppers must have read this before the race
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/van-avermaet-the-muur-doesnt-fit-in-the-new-tour-of-flanders-parcours/
They get a lot of criticism at times, but they played that really well today. That ambush on the Muur was very nice and very well executed - I don't think anyone thought that Gilbert would go so early.

And even though they got a bit unlucky with Boonen - who was probably in position to just mark Sagan and GVA - they still finished 1st and 3rd. Great tactics and, on this form, Boonen may still have his dream finale next weekend.
QuickStep is much more different when there are bosses like Phil or Tom. :cool:
When those two are not there, QS manages to mess it up and fail absimally.
It's the difference between shots being called from the car or from the road :lol:
 
Re: Re:

42x16ss said:
Flamin said:
Irondan said:
Flamin said:
Irondan said:
Yes it is. I don't know how you can't see that.

So Gilbert was this strong in the past 5 years? Please. I've seen races where Greg led out Gilbert in a sprint and still finished in front of him.
Gilbert wasn't allowed by his team to ride these races in the last five years, but before he went to BMC Gilbert podiumed this race twice, and has now won it. There's more results but I don't have time to do any research at the moment but will gladly revisit this conversation at a later time.

Gilbert rode races like Omloop and E3 multiple times with BMC. He just sucked. Yes, let's continue this in the Gilbert thread...
Because Gilbert was aiming for the Ardennes, GVA was leader for BMC at the cobbled races.

Yeah, and he was hardly very impressive there. If Gilbert was always this good, why didn't Quick Step sign him earlier?