He's saving the nuclear missiles for Il Giro.Gigs_98 said:I only tuned in for the last kilometer. What happened to Landa?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
He's saving the nuclear missiles for Il Giro.Gigs_98 said:I only tuned in for the last kilometer. What happened to Landa?
It's just sad what has happened to him after he went to SkyEshnar said:nothing. He's just Landa.Gigs_98 said:I only tuned in for the last kilometer. What happened to Landa?
Of course, but something like Tirol-Rundfahrt just reflects much better. Tour of the Alps is very generic, and could be anywhere. It just reflects some vague race that by assumption must be mountainous. Isn't the Tour de Suisse, by proxy, a Tour of the Alps in some part? How about the Dauphiné, which is all about the Rhône-Alpes département (at least before the mergers)? Settimana Lombarda? Giro della Valle d'Aosta (after all, that never leaves the Alps)? It takes away some of the identity.jaylew said:hrotha said:"I won Paris-Roubaix!"
vs
"I won the Anatomic Jock Race!"
(I'm sure Amstel Gold Race's prestige is so-so because its name is so lame)
Of course you used a ridiculous, unrealistic example.
I'm fine with the name change, but then I just don't care about that kind of thing too much. It's not the first race to change its name.
Man I was out of the chair jumping hahaLaFlorecita said:Scarponi said:Yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
I think it's cool names after a beer but I'm Aussie so hahaLaFlorecita said:Your comment about AGR is spot on. I can't take it seriouslyhrotha said:"I won Paris-Roubaix!"
vs
"I won the Anatomic Jock Race!"
(I'm sure Amstel Gold Race's prestige is so-so because its name is so lame)
When you go from finishing 3rd in the Giro due to dramatic mountain performances to being told you'll be domestiquing at the same race for Geraint freaking Thomas, that does tend to have an effect on your confidence.Rollthedice said:It's Landa's last year of contract, surprised he does not show anything.
Yeah, he's olderLaplaz said:Scarponi > Aru
Libertine Seguros said:When you go from finishing 3rd in the Giro due to dramatic mountain performances to being told you'll be domestiquing at the same race for Geraint freaking Thomas, that does tend to have an effect on your confidence.Rollthedice said:It's Landa's last year of contract, surprised he does not show anything.
Not many, but last two seasons Scarponi was stronger and he absolutely deserves leader position in Giro.klintE said:Yeah, he's olderLaplaz said:Scarponi > Aru
How many pro and GT wins he has had before 30?
Libertine Seguros said:Of course, but something like Tirol-Rundfahrt just reflects much better. Tour of the Alps is very generic, and could be anywhere. It just reflects some vague race that by assumption must be mountainous. Isn't the Tour de Suisse, by proxy, a Tour of the Alps in some part? How about the Dauphiné, which is all about the Rhône-Alpes département (at least before the mergers)? Settimana Lombarda? Giro della Valle d'Aosta (after all, that never leaves the Alps)? It takes away some of the identity.jaylew said:hrotha said:"I won Paris-Roubaix!"
vs
"I won the Anatomic Jock Race!"
(I'm sure Amstel Gold Race's prestige is so-so because its name is so lame)
Of course you used a ridiculous, unrealistic example.
I'm fine with the name change, but then I just don't care about that kind of thing too much. It's not the first race to change its name.
And yes, I know that Trentino is not part of the Tirol, which is why they would be against the Tirol-Rundfahrt name, but at the same time the old name wasn't Giro del Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, so the Tirolers were shut out from the old name themselves (interestingly, the women's race is called Giro del Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol).
I know a lot of the name changes are to do with sponsors (Binck Bank Tour, Healthy Ageing Tour, Classic Haribo and so on), but this is a bit like when the Hessen-Rundfahrt became the 3-Länder Tour. It's quite difficult to find a suitable compromise name, but the former just sounds better because it's specific, you know where they're touring, rather than vague. And Paris-Bruxelles just sounds like more of a prestigious event than Brussels Cycling Classic, similarly - because although none of the "Paris - ?" races actually start in Paris these days, they come with connotations of a long, arduous point to point race, whereas Brussels Cycling Classic falls foul of two of the big problems now - firstly, the use of the word Classic in the name of the race, which is usually a surefire way of guaranteeing that the race isn't of that status (San Sebastián is perhaps the closest to an exception), and secondly, a name that suggests a generic branded city centre race, along the lines of Velothon Berlin, which completely hides the race's history as one of the big autumn one-dayers of times gone by.
The old name obviously is no longer applicable because the race is covering a much wider area now. But the new name has been unsuccessful in conveying the race's history and prestige and because the rebranding has hidden a lot of that, it looks like a new generic 2.1 race on the palmarès, rather than an established race with 50 years of history and an illustrious winner's list including Moser, Saronni, Visentini, Chioccioli, Bugno, Chiapucci, Argentin, Fondriest, Savoldelli, Cunego, Basso, Simoni, Nibali, Vinokourov, Scarponi and Evans.
deValtos said:Do we know if Hugh Carthy is going to the Giro?
LaFlorecita said:Your comment about AGR is spot on. I can't take it seriouslyhrotha said:"I won Paris-Roubaix!"
vs
"I won the Anatomic Jock Race!"
(I'm sure Amstel Gold Race's prestige is so-so because its name is so lame)