Red Rick said:According to Mollema, people in the top 20 had to get off their bikes on the last climb
Unbelievable race design.
Red Rick said:According to Mollema, people in the top 20 had to get off their bikes on the last climb
Unbelievable race design.
Libertine Seguros said:If it's got to the point where I can't even say what I was saying up there without it being "whining" and "BS", you may as well ban me now. Talk about whitewashing - I don't think I was even critical of him.Kwibus said:Pfff please, this whining about Sagan is such BS. He did it very well. Not drawing the attention toward himself. He just did the job of congratulating the riders and giving the jersey to Valverde. All in a very decent respectful way.
Some people must find negativity in everything.
This also answers the critics from clueless posters as Valv. Piti and DFA wanting attacks from the NL squad when it was clearly not possible. And the 'healf-hearted' attempts were actually 100% attempts. See also Hermans saying he had to go deep into red to answer the attacks from Kruijswijk and Oomen.Flamin said:I just read the post-race comments from the Belgians. They had the plan to anticipate but when the finale started, the tempo never dropped for a moment and was generally too high to make something happen. A tough race of attrition, which was obvious from the images. And of course guys like Wellens and Benoot just didn't have the legs.
yaco said:movingtarget said:yaco said:What I took out of the race is Dumoulin is an under-rated climber by the general cycling community, the cycling media and possibly by TD himself.
He has showed again and again that he can climb. His last three grand tours have proved that. Why would he be underrated ? He just doesn't have the uphill kick that someone like Valverde has or Yates.
How many times do you hear or read that TD has to make big gains in the ITT because he will lose time in the mountains - The fact is TD loses little time in the mountains and on a variety of gradients.
You really aren't understand the critique we are putting forth are you? What they did on the last two laps on Igls they should have done earlier, 1 or 2 laps maybe. What did Kelderman and Mollema do? My main criticism of their tactics is they sat 6 (!) riders, passively, at the bottom of the last climb waiting to get slaughtered. Looked like some of them hunted personal glory. It doesn't look so bad because Dumoulin was great, but that wasn't really expected. Then you are getting all whiny and personal about it.Dekker_Tifosi said:This also answers the critics from clueless posters as Valv. Piti and DFA wanting attacks from the NL squad when it was clearly not possible. And the 'healf-hearted' attempts were actually 100% attempts. See also Hermans saying he had to go deep into red to answer the attacks from Kruijswijk and Oomen.Flamin said:I just read the post-race comments from the Belgians. They had the plan to anticipate but when the finale started, the tempo never dropped for a moment and was generally too high to make something happen. A tough race of attrition, which was obvious from the images. And of course guys like Wellens and Benoot just didn't have the legs.
But whatever. DFA and Valv. Piti would've done better. I'm sure![]()
lol, wow, they managed to put the mighty Hermans into the red. And who would have thought the Belgian team, filled with absolutely no climbers would have found it tough going.Dekker_Tifosi said:This also answers the critics from clueless posters as Valv. Piti and DFA wanting attacks from the NL squad when it was clearly not possible. And the 'healf-hearted' attempts were actually 100% attempts. See also Hermans saying he had to go deep into red to answer the attacks from Kruijswijk and Oomen.Flamin said:I just read the post-race comments from the Belgians. They had the plan to anticipate but when the finale started, the tempo never dropped for a moment and was generally too high to make something happen. A tough race of attrition, which was obvious from the images. And of course guys like Wellens and Benoot just didn't have the legs.
But whatever. DFA and Valv. Piti would've done better. I'm sure![]()
Derry said:Red Rick said:According to Mollema, people in the top 20 had to get off their bikes on the last climb
Unbelievable race design.
https://twitter.com/RenaudB31/status/1046413840764817408
Zeits
Dont tell me they couldn't animate/attack earlier in the race when the peloton was still +100 riders yet could sit in the final group of 25 riders or whatever before the last climb.Dekker_Tifosi said:What you fail to understand is that of those 6 guys, 4 were at their limit, of which 3 still tried to attack.
Attacking is only possible if you can actually go faster than the pace in the peloton. Do you understand that simple concept or is that above you?
Red Rick said:Give me 5 reasons why the inclusion of that climb improved that race?Angliru said:Brullnux said:Glorified hill climb championships. Like one of those Vuelta stages, just a bit longer. Disappointed but not surprised
?????????????
Indeed. Of course they could have attacked harder and more often than they did. Undoubtedly they would have blown up trying to stay away as they were chased down, and been dropped hard when they were caught. But that's the whole point of sacrificing riders to burn the domestiques of other team mates early in the race, and make the race less controlled. It's tactics 101 for a team full of diesel climbers in a hilly one day race.Valv.Piti said:Dont tell me they couldn't animate/attack earlier in the race when the peloton was still +100 riders yet could sit in the final group of 25 riders or whatever before the last climb.Dekker_Tifosi said:What you fail to understand is that of those 6 guys, 4 were at their limit, of which 3 still tried to attack.
Attacking is only possible if you can actually go faster than the pace in the peloton. Do you understand that simple concept or is that above you?
You just confirmed you don't understand. Great, that at least explains to me your thought process.Valv.Piti said:Dont tell me they couldn't animate/attack earlier in the race when the peloton was still +100 riders yet could sit in the final group of 25 riders or whatever before the last climb.Dekker_Tifosi said:What you fail to understand is that of those 6 guys, 4 were at their limit, of which 3 still tried to attack.
Attacking is only possible if you can actually go faster than the pace in the peloton. Do you understand that simple concept or is that above you?
That literally makes no sense. Unless the first group caught a train or something.Red Rick said:Mollema said the pace was high for the entire first 200km because the first group got 20 minutes.
It makes every bit of sense.DFA123 said:That literally makes no sense. Unless the first group caught a train or something.Red Rick said:Mollema said the pace was high for the entire first 200km because the first group got 20 minutes.
Not sure why some Dutch fans are having such a hard time accepting their tactical flaws today. I mean, its far from the first time its happened with the likes of Dumoulin and Mollema.
Obviously, he's taking about the part where the break gets 20 minutes. Not the part where the peloton needs to close the 20 minute gap.Red Rick said:It makes every bit of sense.DFA123 said:That literally makes no sense. Unless the first group caught a train or something.Red Rick said:Mollema said the pace was high for the entire first 200km because the first group got 20 minutes.
Not sure why some Dutch fans are having such a hard time accepting their tactical flaws today. I mean, its far from the first time its happened with the likes of Dumoulin and Mollema.
That's how cycling works.
If the break needs to get caught or brought back, the pace is higher than when it's not so far away.
Do you know why the peloton sometimes lets a break dangle at a minute in the last 20km of a sprint stage. Because people will attack if they bring it back with 15km to go.
tobydawq said:Regarding the podium cameo by Sagan, he said the following of the situation to Danish TV:
"I went up there because I'm proud to have been world champion three times and because I'm very happy to pass the jersey on to Valverde. It was a beautiful moment, also for me, as I think he will defend the jersey excellently the coming year. I don't think I'm at his level. He's successful with everything he does in his career, and I think it's very, very good for him and cycling that he got the jersey."
Very nice words.
Derry said:Wel basically this comes down to only Mollema and probably Kelderman in my opinion.
- Poels, never involved.
- Weening, wasn't the guy for attacks and kept close to the leaders
- Tolhoek, I was surprised to even see him in the final. He has made some remarkable progression this year, some nice attacks as well.
- Oomen, a bit the same like Tolhoek. He is just 23 and he attacked a few times at the Iglis climb.
- Kruijswijk, he attacked two times at the second to last climb of the Iglis and then he attacked again on the last climb of the Iglis. He just isn't punchy enough to really crush such an elite group.
- Kelderman, He afterwards said he tried to get Dumoulin in the best position (in which he failed since Dumoulin started the final climb way back). He could have done more.
- Mollema. Waited all day for a 12nd place. He really should have tried something different. Maybe somehting like Valgren.